Microsoft is offering some of its most popular acquisitions via cloud computing with the rollout of Microsoft Online Services. Like many vendors adopting this delivery mode, Microsoft is seeking to exploit companies’ eagerness to downsize their internal IT and computing infrastructures to the greatest extent possible.
The applications Microsoft is hosting and selling through its partners include Microsoft Exchange Online, Microsoft Office SharePoint Online, Microsoft Office Communications Online, Microsoft Office Live Meeting, and Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online.
$15 Per Month, Per User
For US$15 per month per person, users can access Outlook-integrated Exchange Online for e-mail and calendars, Office SharePoint Online collaboration, messaging via Office Communications Online, and Office Live Meeting video-enabled Web conferencing.
For $3 per user per month, the Exchange Online Deskless Worker and SharePoint Online Deskless Worker give users access to e-mail, calendar, address book, company e-mail access and security features through Outlook Web Access Light. The SharePoint subscription gives access to SharePoint portal and team sites and search features.
Of course, Microsoft is not the first vendor to hitch its fortunes to the concept of cloud computing. From Amazon to Google to smaller best-of-breed point solution providers, the space is rapidly becoming crowded with offerings. Indeed, Merrill Lynch recently predicted the cloud computing market will reach $160 billion by 2011.
The role that Microsoft will ultimately play in this complex and continually changing landscape is anyone’s bet — although it will surely be a major provider.
Microsoft’s initiative is very relevant and interesting, given the times, said Aaron Levie, CEO of Box.net, which competes with some of Microsoft’s cloud offerings. Box.net is a Web-based file system that offers online file storage and sharing tools and a collaboration platform.
Microsoft is a little late to the party, though, Levie told the E-Commerce Times, following in Google’s wake.
“But they haven’t lost too much market share, and this is still a good time for them to be coming in,” he allowed. “Many companies are only now starting to realize the potential and power of cloud computing.”
Indeed, right now the market is still amorphous enough to support not only a number of large vendors such as IBM, Cisco, Amazon and Google, but also smaller best-of-breed providers, Levie continued.
“This is not just about Microsoft versus Google,” he said. “It is becoming very apparent companies are rushing in to offer services [in the cloud] that Microsoft used to control.”
Areas that have traditionally required huge computing resources are, not surprisingly, attracting vendor interest, Shane Aubel, partner in Accent Global System Architects, an IT consulting firm, told the E-Commerce Times.
BPM (business process management) vendor Appian is just one example, he said.
Getting as much of the channel as possible on board — particularly developers — will be key to any one vendor grabbing and maintaining market share, Aubel continued.
“Microsoft is trying to do that with its Software as a Service product line, but via the cloud — getting developers engaged in developing and customizing that system,” he said.
Barriers that are hindering commercial adoption pose another challenge, noted Aubel. From the consumer perspective, the offerings — such as Google’s — are easy to understand, which is why there is a great deal of competition in that particular niche.
Implementing more advanced applications via the cloud becomes more difficult, though, depending on the organization’s size, he continued, “but we are still seeing more promotion of these services than actual adoption.”
tmccune – thanks for clarifying but as a businessperson, I truly do not care what the "real" definition is. You may notice that I put "cloud" in quotes, it was simply an easy to remember term to use.
What I care about and what matters is the ability to move my entire business software to a location, vendor and platform independent location — the internet. Perhaps the "thin client" concept will eventually come to pass. Just give me a browser anywhere at any machine and I can do business.
Microsoft is way too late in this game and with Gates gone (I think Bill saw the writing on the wall) and the possibility of finally breaking away from the stranglehold of Microsoft, I for one and many others I AM sure, are ready to jump ship.
The only reason my company runs Win XP is because our main application needs it … and no it will not run on Vista. I AM even using remote software like gotomypc on a Mac to avoid Windows.
So not only AM I moving everything to the non Microsoft "Cloud", Win XP/Pro is the LAST Microsoft OS and if at all possible application I will ever buy (and now I can’t even buy it – smart move Balmer – LOL).
Google is way ahead and they even have a very nice video explaining what the "cloud" is.
FYI, I AM not a techie Unix, Mac, Linux fanboy, I even believe that Microsoft in the past did help technology progress. However, I also recognize the horrific IT costs and have pulled out my hair so many times (I AM surprised I AM not bald) due to the bugs in Microsoft OS and applications.
With Balmer at the helm, Google is laughing all the way to the bank.
The ubiquitous use of the term cloud computing seems to be something journalists can’t resist. The Microsoft offerings are definitely Software as a Service (SaaS) but it’s not cloud computing.