Amazon Turns Gears of Internet Tax Wars

More companies are joining in the fight over Internet taxation begun by Amazon.com.

Internet retailers Blue Nile and Overstock.com have joined the Web’s largest retailer in dropping affiliate programs in North Carolina and Rhode Island, according to numerous press reports. Amazon also reportedly dropped its affiliate program in Hawaii.

Affiliate programs allow Web site operators to earn money from product sales by setting up online stores and funneling customers to the parent site.

In all three states, lawmakers are considering or have passed legislation that would require collection of sales tax from customers who purchase from online sites that have affiliate programs in that state. Other states may follow suit as they try to find ways to replace revenue that has evaporated in the recession.

Most states already tax online purchases from sites run by companies that have traditional storefronts in the state, such as Best Buy or Wal-Mart.

Unconstitutional Practice?

However, Amazon and the other online retailers argue such legislation is unconstitutional because, to quote Blue Nile’s letter to affiliates, “it requires sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect sales tax on sales to buyers in that state.”

Blue Nile is evaluating whether to take similar action in other states, spokesperson John Baird told the E-Commerce Times.

Amazon.com officials did not respond to a request for comment left with the company’s media relations office.

Affiliates Too Important to Brush Off

Affliate programs are a huge part of Amazon’s growth strategy, and it’s unlikely the company will disrupt those arrangements on a large scale to protest tax polices, Javelin Strategy & Research analyst Bruce Cundiff told the E-Commerce Times.

“Strategically, Amazon is farming more and more of its business to those affiliates,” he said. “They’re trying to create more of a marketplace. This is very important to Amazon’s present and future.”

Sales Tax Minor Motivator for Consumers

On the other hand, customer behavior data shows that sales tax avoidance is a relatively small factor in deciding whether to buy an item locally or online, Cundiff said.

“Convenience definitely trumps sales tax avoidance,” he said.

That means Amazon isn’t likely to lose much in sales to traditional retailers if they’re both taxed.

The changes could mean more to big-ticket retailers like Blue Nile or Tiger Direct, a computer and computer parts dealer.

“I think it makes more sense for companies like Blue Nile to jump in on this,” he said. “For Amazon, at the end of the day, it’s cutting off your nose to spite your face.”

What’s Next?

Amazon is probably not bluffing, said Cundiff. That said, it’s unlikely the company would pull the plug on affiliate relations in California if that financially strapped state moves forward with a proposal to tax the site’s customers.

Such tax policies would backfire on states — and the country as a whole — if allowed to stand, said Overstock.com President Jonathan Johnson.

Affiliate programs would likely just move overseas, he said.

“Internet advertising is a tidy little business that can be done by just about anyone, anywhere on the globe, and when states unwisely and unconstitutionally pass these laws, their local Internet ad business will quickly go dark, and that ad business will simply migrate to states more friendly to Internet commerce,” explained Johnson. “In the end, the only thing to be accomplished by these laws will be to put more local citizens out of work — exactly the wrong choice in a down economy.”

1 Comment

  • Those affiliates already pay income taxes on the profits they get from those sites. So states are really shooting themselves over nothing really. They are loosing more than the few bucks they are hoping to gain. Really, why kill the internet when its feeding people?

Leave a Comment

Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.

More by Mike Pearson
More in E-Commerce

E-Commerce Times Channels