Because they are businesses, many comparison sites have forged behind-the-scenes
agreements that prevent them from being purely unbiased and all-encompassing.
Experts have a message for undecided shoppers who think a single comparison Web site will
give them all the information they need to choose from among a dizzying array of options:
Keep looking.
Because of comparison sites' various agendas -- not to mention wide variations in their
ability to deliver on promises -- consumers should view such sites as just another stop
along the road to a truly informed decision.
"There's really no such thing as one-stop comparison shopping,"
GartnerG2 research director Geri Spieler told the
E-Commerce Times.
A number of sites -- with names like MySimon.com, PricingCentral.com and CoolShopping.com
-- offer reviews, pricing and other information for a range of product categories, from
home electronics and computer gear to CDs and clothing.
Hidden Motives
While most comparison-shopping sites are well-intentioned and perform a needed service,
experts say they often are not truly comprehensive in terms of product presentation.
Because they are businesses, many have forged behind-the-scenes arrangements and
agreements that prevent them from being purely unbiased and all-encompassing.
According to Spieler, even sites that promise to scour the entire Web for product
bargains use search engines that are subject to special-placement and other sponsor
considerations, just like most search portals.
Specialized sites also have issues that consumers must keep in mind. Spieler pointed to
BabyCenter.com, among the most popular sites visited by expectant parents, as one
example.
While BabyCenter gets high marks for its helpful content pages and interactive community
features, users need to be aware that the site is owned by a corporate entity -- Johnson
& Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) -- that makes infant-oriented products. Site visitors should keep this fact in
mind as they look at product comparisons and reviews, Spieler said.
Not Always Unbiased
In addition, comparison sites sometimes have advertising arrangements that are designed
to give prominent play to certain manufacturers. And Spieler noted that the comment
portions of these sites -- where ostensibly independent consumers offer feedback and
reviews of products they have purchased -- can be subject to manipulation.
Similarly, user ratings of merchants doing business on a site, which are often used by
auction companies like eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), may not always be reliable.
"These sites are subject to whoever is bringing them the information," Spieler said.
"There is only so much information they can have."
Even if a site gives users the best price, she said, it may fall short when it comes to
providing other information -- such as warranty, service and return info -- that
consumers need to make optimal purchase decisions.
In addition, Spieler said, some sites inadvertently could lead price-oriented consumers
to purchase cheap knockoffs of designer clothing, for example, or pirated versions of
CDs.
Do Your Research
But these caveats do not mean consumers should ignore comparison sites; instead, they
should approach them as just one part of the buying research process.
Spieler recommended checking at least two comparison sites, among other sources.
Government representatives who deal with consumer issues also urge shoppers to take
advantage of the growing number of ways to find out about products.
Lemuel Dowdy, a senior staff attorney with the Federal Trade
Commission, said consumers have a range of options -- starting with the old-fashioned
Sunday newspaper -- and need not be hemmed in by the offerings of any single comparison
site.
"They can cross-check the information they get at a comparison shopping site by going to
manufacturer Web sites and store sites to confirm what they found," Dowdy told the
E-Commerce Times.
Don't Forget About Sales
Dowdy noted that store and manufacturer sites often beat comparison sites when it comes
to finding updated information about product features and pricing deals.
"Sales happen all the time," he added. "Do your own check to make sure your decision is
based on the latest information."
For items like used cars, Dowdy cautioned, prices listed on comparison sites may not
reflect the true final cost of the product. That cost often is not determined until the
buyer visits the dealer's lot and a bottom-line price is negotiated, accounting for such
issues as service and optional equipment.
I believe that shoppers are looking for more than just a comparison of price and are often ...
Next Article in News
GartnerG2: Postal Rate Hike Will Drive E-Billing April 12, 2002
Dislodging consumers from the deeply ingrained practice of paying bills via mail will
require some work on the part of companies doing the billing.
Related Stories
What Sells Best on the Internet March 04, 2002
According to experts, the next big e-commerce wave could be fueled by grocery companies
- but not those that rely solely on home delivery, as e-commerce flameout Webvan did.
Whatever Happened To E-Commerce Robots? February 28, 2002
Bot providers derive referral revenue from merchants listed on their sites - but many
shoppers research online and purchase through offline channels.
Profile of the Perfect E-Commerce Customer January 23, 2002
Because price is such a concern for the new breed of online shoppers, they are far less
likely to be loyal to any given e-tailer.
The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots July 13, 2001
With so many obstacles to overcome, will Internet shopping agents or 'bots' survive the
dot-com tempest?
An Online Bargain, Right Under Our Noses May 17, 2001
Why are comparison sites facing an uphill struggle? It may have to do
with the adage, 'there's no such thing as a free lunch.'
Related News Alerts
More by Lou Hirsh
MySAP Supply Chain Management November 11, 2002
SAP is exploring technology that could be used to alert managers by e-mail or wireless messages about required changes in inventory, or to perform a wide range of tasks without human intervention.
Red Hat's Switch Campaign November 04, 2002
Red Hat said its migration campaign is steadily garnering backing from a number of big-name hardware and software providers, including IBM, Dell, Intel, AMD and Oracle.
Will Itanium 2 Spell Relief for Intel? October 25, 2002
While the jury remains out on the overall prognosis for the chip, IDC research director Steve Josselyn said the most likely scenario is that Itanium 2 will gain wide acceptance, but not until 2004 or 2005.