By Katherine Noyes E-Commerce Times
07/02/07 2:28 PM PT
An FCC ruling that took effect on July 1 mandates that cable operators must provide consumers with set-top boxes that include a slot for the new CableCard. With the CableCard, customers will eventually be able to choose from competing set-top boxes from various providers without restriction by their cable operator.
eMarketer Whitepaper: Optimizing the E-Commerce Experience
From the Web to the Contact Center, are you prepared to proactively engage and keep your savvy customers? Read how e-commerce leaders are optimizing their sites with ratings, reviews, live help, Web analytics, mobile and more.
From this day forward, consumers who purchase cable TV subscriptions will no longer be forced to lease integrated set-top boxes provided by their cable operators.
Instead, as a result of a ruling by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that took effect July 1, cable operators must now provide consumers with set-top boxes that include a slot for the new CableCard. Rather than being integrated directly into the set-top box, access-control mechanisms determining which content consumers may receive must now be encoded in the CableCard.
The result: At least in theory, consumers will eventually be able to choose from an assortment of competing set-top boxes from various providers -- either for lease or for purchase -- without restriction by their cable operator. Quality, prices and consumer choice should all benefit -- or at least, so the logic goes.
Competitive Benefits
"We have finally arrived at the July 1 implementation date, and soon consumers will be offered the widest choices in both equipment and services," said Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA).
"Between this momentous milestone and last week's action by the FCC to bring two-way plug-and-play devices to market, consumers will soon reap the benefits of the competitive marketplace that Congress envisioned over a decade ago," he added.
Currently, two set-top box manufacturers -- Motorola (NYSE: MOT) and Cisco's Scientific Atlanta -- supply virtually all the boxes cable operators then provide to subscribers. As part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress mandated that the FCC help electronics companies compete with the cable operators' equipment. Implementation didn't happen for a full 11 years, however, thanks to numerous delays and requests for waivers.
The NCTA, which is the main trade association for cable TV providers in the United States, has been an outspoken opponent of the new set-top box rules, despite the hand cable manufacturers had in the development of the CableCard.
Calling the integration ban "completely unnecessary" and "essentially a tax on all new digital set-top boxes," the NCTA argues that the end result of the new rules will be an additional US$600 million per year paid by consumers as manufacturers pass along the associated costs in the form of higher prices. Meanwhile, it argues, the new system will offer "no tangible benefits."
Weak Demand
Developed in 2003, CableCards have been available upon consumer request for the past few years, but demand has been weak. While 8 million digital cable-ready TVs including slots for the cards have already been shipped, only 240,000 CableCards have actually been deployed.
"We're a little bruised and battered," Julie Kearney, senior director and regulatory council for the CEA, told the E-Commerce Times. "The cable industry fought implementation for years. In our view, now they have to grade their own homework."
Before the new rules, consumers were offered "only one flavor" of set-top box, Kearney said: "Vanilla -- and really expensive vanilla." Under the new rules, lower prices and more choices for consumers should follow, along with greater incentive for TV manufacturers to innovate, she added.
"This is the first really big step," she explained. "If we don't get a lot of complaints from consumers, there will be a rush among our members to build devices."
Few Choices
Of course, realizing that potential may take some time. Despite the fact that third-party manufacturers including Samsung, Panasonic and Pace already manufacture set-top boxes, none are currently available through retailers, Michael Paxton, principal analyst with In-Stat, told the E-Commerce Times.
Add to that the fact that the current version of the CableCard is a one-way device, meaning it won't allow consumers to take advantage of such services as Video on Demand, and it's not clear there will be much demand for a purchase option even when more devices do become available, Paxton added.
"I have my doubts," he said. "There doesn't seem to be much excitement about the idea of going out and buying a set-top box."
Ultimately, "this is a non-event for consumers," Paxton concluded. "Its impact will be minimal."
HD DVD Is Amazon's Pick for Indie Flicks July 02, 2007
Amazon's CustomFlix service has picked a side in the high-definition DVD format war. The online retailer has partnered with Microsoft to offer independent films on HD DVD. CustomFlix is a service that burns a disc for the customer when it is ordered, reducing inventory expenses. The program gives indie filmmakers the chance to distribute their work in a high-definition format, the companies said.
Related Stories
Hooking Up in a High-Tech World, Part 2: TV and Phone June 13, 2007
When it comes to paid television service, consumers can go for traditional choices such as satellite and cable, or go down the road less traveled with cutting edge technologies such as FiOS TV, Internet Protocol TV and Broadband TV. While all services in general provide access to the same array of channels, the difference lies in the interactive options of each
The Silver Screen, the Flat Screen and the Three Screens April 16, 2007
Movie producers are stuck in an outdated business model, where the goal is to drive as many people as possible to the first weekend of a showing, and are clinging onto a notion of exclusivity. If you look at how movie rights are allocated, you'll see Hollywood still holds rather strict tenets when it comes to who gets to view what and how.
Related News Alerts
More by Katherine Noyes
FOSS and the Google Question November 19, 2009
How FOSSy is Google, really? "I find it kinda funny that folks tout that Google uses Linux when the most useful tool they have developed -- the Google FS -- they keep internally and therefore don't have to share the code!" observed Slashdot blogger hairyfeet. "So how exactly is Google different from MSFT and Apple, who have both in the past locked up free code for themselves?"
Can T-Mobile Get Its Groove Back? November 18, 2009
T-Mobile may have a hard time pulling itself out of a swamp of customer discontent if it doesn't reverse course soon. The wireless carrier has been having some bad luck that has only been compounded by some poor decisions. "It takes a long time and much effort to build customer confidence, but a very short time to lose it," remarked telecom analyst Jeff Kagan.
Microsoft Goof - One Small Snag in a Code-Licensing Quagmire November 17, 2009
Microsoft will open source the code to a Windows 7 tool in order to rectify the erroneous inclusion of code licensed under the GPL. Redmond's response to the problem "does indicate a growing maturity with respect to free and open source licenses," said RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady.