By Staff Writer E-Commerce Times
08/05/03 2:54 PM PT
Forrester analyst Stacey Quandt noted that SCO's assertions are based on allegations, not facts -- and the court date for SCO's case is not until 2005. Therefore, she said, commercial Linux customers do not have a good rationale to purchase licenses.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
SCO has announced that it will sell intellectual property (IP) licenses to make it legal for enterprises to run Linux, which allegedly uses portions of SCO's proprietary Unix source code.
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell told the E-Commerce Times that this license covers the company's IP rights in Linux 2.4 kernels and later -- almost every Linux distribution released since the year 2000.
However, he said, SCO is targeting only corporate and enterprise Linux customers.
"That's all we're concerned with," Stowell noted. "We're not planning to go after noncommercial users with this license."
Licenses Planned
In July, SCO registered copyrights for both its Unix System V and UnixWare software and announced plans to offer licenses that would rectify intellectual property infringement for companies using Linux. The company also said it would meet with commercial Linux customers beginning this week to put forward the particulars of its binary licensing program.
"We believe it is necessary for Linux customers to properly license SCO's IP," Chris Sontag, senior vice president and general manager of SCOsource, said. "The license insures that customers can continue their use of binary deployments of Linux without violating SCO's intellectual property rights."
Pricing
SCO is offering an introductory license price of US$699 per CPU until October 15, 2003. After October 15th, the price per CPU will jump to $1,399, according to Stowell.
Licenses for multiple-CPU systems, embedded systems, single-CPU add-ons and desktop systems are also available, although SCO did not list specific prices for them.
Pointing out that Linux itself is available for free, Stowell said $699 is a reasonable price for a server system. SCO's UnixWare license retails for about the same price.
Rationale, Not Price
Forrester Research analyst Stacey Quandt told the E-Commerce Times that it was not unforeseen that SCO would come up with a means to monetize its intellectual property. However, she said, it remains to be seen whether or not companies will comply with the licensing program.
She noted that SCO's assertions are based on allegations, not facts -- and the court date for SCO's case is set in 2005. Because the case most likely will not be resolved until then, commercial Linux customers do not have a good rationale to purchase the licenses.
Although SCO seems to be offering its license at a discount to give customers incentive to buy it, Quandt said the price is not an obstacle.
In fact, she said that even if the price of the license were a dollar, companies still would be asking why they should pay anything at all for something that has yet to be proven.
Red Hat Goes on Offensive with SCO Suit August 05, 2003
Red Hat's complaint contains seven individual allegations, two aimed at proving that its products do not infringe on SCO's patents and the other five seeking injunctions and remedial action for claims that Red Hat Linux borrows from Unix.
SCO's Biggest Stalwart – Microsoft? August 01, 2003
Microsoft has already purchased a license from SCO to free the company of future claims against Linux. The deal is estimated at about US$10 million. SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell would not discuss the terms of the deal, but confirmed that Microsoft is an ally.
Split Decision on SCO Impact, Response July 29, 2003
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell argued that the proposed license –- a runtime-only binary license –- is separate from Linux and the GPL that covers it. He told TechNewsWorld that SCO believes use of Linux could lead to end-user liability.
IBM Pushes Linux in Face of SCO Suit July 25, 2003
Calling SCO's attempts to sell licenses to Linux users "nonsense," Aberdeen Group's Bill Claybrook questioned why companies should buy such a license before even knowing whether it is really required.
SCO Takes Linux Licensing Fight Further July 22, 2003
By stating that Linux creator Linus Torvalds inherited the copyright violation and was not responsible for it, SCO is "trying to ruffle as few feathers as possible."
More by Staff Writer
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round Two: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 13, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round two of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match, in which Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle square off on one of today's key Mac issues. Today Enderle and Chaffin eachs kicks metaphorical mounds of sand on the arguments the other made in round one on the question of where Apple will be five years from now.
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round One: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 12, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round one of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match. Today, Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle each offer their predictions of what sort of company Apple will be in five years. Will Apple rule the "Digital Life" -- or be the Atari of 2009?
PeopleSoft Blames Oracle for Share Price Free Fall July 07, 2004
Forrester vice president and CRM analyst Erin Kinikin described PeopleSoft as being on a very narrow tightrope since Oracle first made its takeover offer. "To prove [it] can survive as an independent company, PeopleSoft has to make its numbers," Kinikin told CRM Buyer. "Any time PeopleSoft pre-announces lower earnings, people are going to wonder if [it is] falling off the tightrope."
Headline Feeds
Talkback: 
