Welcome | Sign In
ECommerceTimes.com
Malware

NATO Rallies to Thwart Global Cyber Bullies

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
NATO Rallies to Thwart Global Cyber Bullies

NATO alliance members on Thursday agreed that the group should focus on cyberdefense strategies. The announcement surfaces several weeks after massive cyberattacks against Estonia took place. The attacks on Estonian government and corporate Web sites "had clear national security and economic implications for Estonia," said NATO spokesperson James Appathurai.


How Much is 'Free' Costing You?
Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.

Following the massive cyberattacks against the Baltic country of Estonia in April, NATO on Thursday asserted that cyberdefense must now be a priority among member nations.

Several defense ministers, including Estonia's, raised the issue during a meeting at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, and all 26 alliance members agreed that a new focus on cyberdefense was critical to protect against similar attacks in the future.

"There was sentiment around the table that urgent work is needed to enhance the ability to protect information systems of critical importance to the Alliance against cyberattacks," NATO spokesperson James Appathurai said. "Therefore, that will be, I am sure, a subject of work here within NATO starting tomorrow or maybe Monday."

Attack on Estonia

Roughly a million computers worldwide were used to conduct the denial-of-service attacks on Estonian government and corporate Web sites, swamping them with so much traffic they were forced to shut down.

The attacks began on April 27, the day Estonia enraged Russia by removing a Soviet-era war memorial from its capital city of Tallinn. The Estonian government traced much of the attacking traffic to Russian computers, it said, but the Russian government has denied involvement.

After the attacks had gone on for about three weeks, NATO sent an official to investigate.

What Is War?

The attacks "were sustained; they were coordinated; they were focused; they were against a public information infrastructure of Estonia," Appathurai said. "They had clear national security and economic implications for Estonia."

Indeed, the attacks on Estonia have led to new discussions about whether such cyberwarfare should be considered in the same category as traditional warfare, and, if so, what the response should be. Now that the topic has gained NATO's official attention, it will also undoubtedly spur increased conversation about what, exactly, should be done in the way of prevention.

"I'm surprised it took so long to get to this level," Johannes Ullrich, chief technology officer at the SANS (SysAdmin, Audit, Networking and Security) Institute, told TechNewsWorld.

Extreme Vulnerability

Although the U.S. military has been working for years to secure its cyber infrastructure, "China has launched some successful attacks against U.S. military computers," Ullrich said.

Most of those attacks were aimed at gathering intelligence, he said, but "once they can penetrate a network, shutting the system down is actually easier than getting in."

The military's heavy reliance on its technology infrastructure for communications makes it extremely vulnerable, he said: "If you can shut down the cyberinfrastructure that controls the logistics, you can essentially leave the troops stranded out in the field without supplies."

Learning to Share

Nevertheless, private companies are subject to cyberattacks "all the time," Ullrich pointed out, and Internet service providers and other vendors have long been working on solutions to the problem.

One of the most important things for preventing such attacks will be the exchange of information, Ullrich stressed. "We need cooperation between government and the private sector, and between countries," he said. "If one country gets attacked, it may be able to alert others who may not have even detected an intrusion yet."

Cybersecurity expert and lawyer Parry Aftab agreed. "We really need to do so much more in the way of collaboration," she said.

"What we need to do is pull experts together into a room and determine what we need to do, what it will take, and who needs to be involved," Aftab told TechNewsWorld. "We have unbelievable talent in this area--now it's time to start deploying it."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Katherine Noyes


More by Katherine Noyes

FOSS and the Google Question
November 19, 2009
How FOSSy is Google, really? "I find it kinda funny that folks tout that Google uses Linux when the most useful tool they have developed -- the Google FS -- they keep internally and therefore don't have to share the code!" observed Slashdot blogger hairyfeet. "So how exactly is Google different from MSFT and Apple, who have both in the past locked up free code for themselves?"
Can T-Mobile Get Its Groove Back?
November 18, 2009
T-Mobile may have a hard time pulling itself out of a swamp of customer discontent if it doesn't reverse course soon. The wireless carrier has been having some bad luck that has only been compounded by some poor decisions. "It takes a long time and much effort to build customer confidence, but a very short time to lose it," remarked telecom analyst Jeff Kagan.
Microsoft Goof - One Small Snag in a Code-Licensing Quagmire
November 17, 2009
Microsoft will open source the code to a Windows 7 tool in order to rectify the erroneous inclusion of code licensed under the GPL. Redmond's response to the problem "does indicate a growing maturity with respect to free and open source licenses," said RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network