By Elizabeth Millard E-Commerce Times
02/06/04 8:12 AM PT
In some ways, Yankee Group analyst Dana Gardner told the E-Commerce Times, SCO has passed the point of no return. Dropping the lawsuit now or in the near future could be so damaging to the company that it would not be able to continue operations.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
The SCO Group has broadened its lawsuit against IBM (NYSE: IBM) by adding a copyright
infringement claim to the case.
SCO announced at the beginning of last year that it was suing IBM, claiming
that the company had used proprietary Unix code obtained from SCO in creating
its version of Linux. Since then, the case has had numerous twists and
turns, with IBM countersuing and SCO going after Novell.
Although SCO has amended its original complaint before, the copyright
infringement claim is a major new element. A hearing is scheduled for today,
February 6th, to determine what information IBM needs to disclose to SCO as both
companies head toward a scheduled trial date of April 11, 2005.
Preparing for Battle
SCO previously was prevented from formally including copyright infringement in
the case due to unresolved issues with Novell, which sold most of its Unix
intellectual property rights to SCO's predecessor.
The addition of the copyright claim is an indication that SCO is ready to
take every avenue in its lawsuit against IBM, Yankee Group analyst Dana
Gardner told the E-Commerce Times.
"SCO continues to be persistent in standing up for what they think is an
injustice," he said.
He added that even though there have been legal setbacks for SCO in the
case, the company seems to be preparing for a long, drawn-out and
increasingly complicated lawsuit.
I Know You Are, But What Am I?
The accusations and wrangling in the SCO case have started to look like the
legal equivalent of a playground squabble.
During the course of SCO's suit and IBM's countersuit, each company has
filed several motions to try to force the other side into releasing
information.
In one motion in December, IBM criticized SCO for delivering copious source code
that had been printed on sheets of paper, rather than in electronic
form. SCO, in turn, said it could deliver the code in any way it saw fit.
Similar criticisms and scuffles are not limited to just the two companies.
In December, Darl McBride, SCO's chief executive, put an open letter on the
company's Web site, accusing the Free Software Foundation and Linux vendor
Red Hat of undermining the U.S. and European systems of copyrights and
patents.
No Way Out
With continued insults being hurled in formal statements and Web site
postings, SCO will move forward with its trial preparations as the target
of much ire from the Linux community and others, Gardner noted.
"There's a lot of negative sentiment toward the company," he said. "You see
it in everything from published remarks to the recent denial-of-service
attack. But they're continuing to be resolute. That means we'll continue
to see them go forward with this suit."
In some ways, he said, SCO has passed the point of no return. Dropping the
lawsuit now or in the near future could be so damaging to the company that
it would not be able to continue operations.
"It seems to be essential to the viability of their business," Gardner noted.
"To a large degree, whether they continue as a business is contingent on the
success of this lawsuit."
After the Ruling
Even if SCO does win the suit, it remains to be seen whether the company
will be able to foster good relations with a user community that is
squarely on the side of IBM in the suit.
Gartner (NYSE: IT) analyst George Weiss told the E-Commerce Times that a cloud still
hangs over the Linux community because of SCO's actions.
"You can't have this back-and-forth accusation and innuendo without
affecting users," he said. "It's costing SCO a tremendous price in terms of
goodwill."
He added that the company could have a hard time once the suit is concluded.
"They have to function in a larger community," he said. "If they come out
with any new products, they need a level of goodwill for it to succeed in
the market. If they have none, people won't be enthusiastic about doing
business with them."
Preparing for the Superworm at the Front Lines February 06, 2004
Jerry Brady, CTO of Guardent, told TechNewsWorld that we haven't seen a superworm attack yet because worms haven't evolved to a point at which they can react and adapt to changes in defense strategies in real-time. "But when someone is actually running a controlled channel to modify the worm in progress and react to the defenses put up against it, we will be in trouble," said Brady.
Related Stories
MyDoom Hits SCO Hard, Prompts Preemptive Shutdown February 02, 2004
A variant of MyDoom is expected to attack Microsoft's main Web site on February 3rd. However, F-Secure director of antivirus research Mikko Hypponen told the E-Commerce Times, the attack aimed at Microsoft involves computers infected with the B variant of the worm, which did not spread as widely as the variant targeting SCO.
SCO Accuses Novell in Libel Lawsuit January 21, 2004
"[SCO is] going after Novell's clients and potential clients, IBM and its channels, the whole lineage of Linux code," Yankee Group senior analyst Dana Gardner told the E-Commerce Times. "Are they going after Martha Stewart next?"
Red Hat Indemnifies Enterprise Linux Buyers January 20, 2004
"[Indemnification] sends a powerful message to customers and end users," Yankee Group analyst Dana Gardner told the E-Commerce Times. "It tells them they can buy this software, deploy it and not have to lose sleep at night worrying about the legal ramifications. Their vendors have their backs covered on that front."
Novell Indemnifies Linux Users January 13, 2004
Novell's move to indemnify SuSE users was announced a day after SCO president and CEO Darl McBride challenged Linux vendors to "put their money where their mouth is and protect end users with true vendor-based indemnification."
IBM, Intel Back Linux Legal Defense Fund January 12, 2004
Although Linux vendor Red Hat has already filed a countersuit against SCO and has offered to help fund its own customers' defense, the move by OSDL represents much-needed leadership among the disparate Linux users and developers SCO has targeted or will target, IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky told the E-Commerce Times.
Related News Alerts
More by Elizabeth Millard
Ken Xie of Fortinet on Fighting Content Threats November 25, 2004
"Integrating independent security systems together and keeping them all up-to-date and able to coordinate their actions in the face of a fast-moving attack is a daunting if not intractable task," Fortinet CEO Ken Xie told ECT News. "To deal with today's and tomorrow's blended threats requires a more integrated, holistic approach to security."
Microsoft Files More Lawsuits over Spam September 24, 2004
Going after spammers rather than focusing merely on developing antispam technology is an important step, John Movina, spokesperson for the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email, said. He told The E-Commerce Times that the United States has weaker criminal laws against spam than other countries, so it's vital to find other means to stop spammers.
French Firms Aim To Beef Up Linux Security September 24, 2004
The consortium plans to make bringing Linux up to the Evaluation Assurance Level 5 (EAL5), which is part of an internationally recognized security certification called Common Criteria, its first effort. EAL5 satisfies major security requirements in commercial as well as defense and government applications.