Consumers are confused by pricing plans that vary wildly from carrier to carrier and
between various network technologies, Giga's Thomas said.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
As wireless providers search for the right mix of services to spawn a boom in mobile
commerce, experts say they also must develop a data pricing strategy that clicks with
customers.
According to Yankee Group research
director Adam Zawel, the practice of charging based on bytes or kilobytes of data
transmitted to a mobile device baffles many users.
"The vast majority of wireless consumers don't know what a bit or byte is, so they are
probably not going to be excited about paying for them," Zawel told the E-Commerce Times.
Too Many Plans
In addition to the knowledge factor, consumers often cannot determine the true cost of
data services when pricing plans are phrased in terms of kilobytes or megabytes,
Giga Information Group research
director Brownlee Thomas told the E-Commerce Times.
"The carriers right now make it very difficult for average consumers to know up front
what they will be paying when the bill arrives," Thomas said.
Consumers are also confused by pricing plans that vary wildly from carrier to carrier and
between various network technologies, she added.
Mounting Bills
While prices vary based on regions and special promotions, a recent check showed that
Cingular Wireless, for example, charges
US$7 per month for 1 MB of data and 10 cents per text message, with a $9 plan that
includes 100 messages. For data receipt over 1 MB, the cost is an additional 3 cents per
kilobyte -- which Thomas noted amounts to $30 per megabyte.
In actual usage terms, Thomas said, monthly bills could mount quickly for an average user
-- 10 MB is enough for about 180 Web pages or 1,700 e-mails. Also, the costs cited apply only
to data. Voice calls are charged separately, and there are additional fees for roaming.
Thomas said today's pricing plans are affordable for many enterprises, but consumers will
likely remain resistant until prices are reduced and streamlined. She noted that a
reasonable monthly rate at which consumers probably would use data services is in the
range of $40 to $50 -- about what users pay, for example, for e-mail service on a
BlackBerry device.
Strategy Search
For the foreseeable future, Zawel said, wireless companies will offer a variety of
pricing models for data services. Carriers probably will want to link pricing to network
usage as long as network capacity is constrained, but flat-rate plans will be attractive
for their simplicity.
Per-kilobyte pricing will likely find more traction in the enterprise than in the
consumer services arena, he noted.
"Over the next few years, we will see at least three pricing models: per minute,
per byte and per transaction," Zawel said.
Before mobile commerce can take off in the United States to the extent that it has
progressed in Asia and Europe, wireless providers must clear a number of hurdles,
according to experts.
One such hurdle is that carriers must clearly distinguish free content -- services
bundled with a flat-rate fee -- from premium content that they hope to provide on a
per-transaction basis, Zawel said.
'Cold Shoulder'
In a recent research brief, Forrester
analyst Charles Golvin noted that the marketing and pricing problems facing U.S.
wireless providers are embodied in AT&T's (NYSE: T) mid-April launch of its mMode wireless data
service.
Golvin predicted that mMode in its current form "will meet with a cold shoulder" because
of several problems, including undifferentiated services -- limited primarily to
messaging, search, calendar and games -- and "nebulous pricing."
"MMode forces customers to learn the meaning of a kilobyte because it charges customers
based on the number of bytes downloaded -- including any advertising content," Golvin
said, noting that AT&T charges an additional 25 percent premium on data roaming.
"The pay-per-byte model runs counter to U.S. consumers' Internet experience of unlimited
usage at a flat rate," Golvin added. "Early mMode adopters will use the service sparingly
until they understand the relationship between usage and cost."
Experts pointed to a number of other reasons why
consumers have not flocked to
m-commerce, including
privacy and security concerns, a lack
of compelling applications, and device navigation designs that are not well suited for
buying products and services.
Tide Still Expected
While pricing formulas are in flux and current adoption of m-commerce is sluggish,
experts noted that an eventually huge market for data services is not in doubt. The
Yankee Group has predicted there will be close to 100 million
mobile data users in the
United States alone by 2006.
The research firm also has projected that by the same year, 50 million wireless phone
users in the United States will use their mobile devices to authorize payments for
premium content and physical goods.
In an April research report, Zawel said that mobile payments will become "a real
opportunity" once next-generation
networks are launched and devices with multimedia wireless access are available to
consumers.
Giga's Thomas noted that once pricing issues are ironed out, carriers will still have to
convince users to trade in their older devices for newer ones enabled for optimum use of
m-commerce services.
"If you don't have something that gives me an irresistible experience, I'm not going to
use it," she said.
The Double Standard of E-Commerce Service May 01, 2002
When a Web-only store does not adequately handle a complaint or question, there is no way
to ask for the manager.
Related Stories
Related News Alerts
More by Lou Hirsh
MySAP Supply Chain Management November 11, 2002
SAP is exploring technology that could be used to alert managers by e-mail or wireless messages about required changes in inventory, or to perform a wide range of tasks without human intervention.
Red Hat's Switch Campaign November 04, 2002
Red Hat said its migration campaign is steadily garnering backing from a number of big-name hardware and software providers, including IBM, Dell, Intel, AMD and Oracle.
Will Itanium 2 Spell Relief for Intel? October 25, 2002
While the jury remains out on the overall prognosis for the chip, IDC research director Steve Josselyn said the most likely scenario is that Itanium 2 will gain wide acceptance, but not until 2004 or 2005.