By John P. Mello Jr. LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
08/26/03 1:18 PM PT
"We believe the directive will open the floodgates for software patents in Europe," maintained Håkon Wium Lie, chief technology officer of Opera Software. "This is a threat both to open-source developers -- who clearly cannot afford to pay licence fees -- and to companies like Opera Software."
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
A protest tomorrow in the streets of Brussels, Belgium, over a proposed European law on software patents will spill into the Internet as more than 600 Web sites are expected to modify their operations in support of the dissenters.
The online protest is being organized by the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FIFF). The group is asking Web sites of every stripe to shut down for the day in support of the protesters and to replace their home page with a protest page.
The sample page at the FIFF Web site reads in three languages: "This page is temporarily closed in protest against software patents. Web sites may soon be closed down regularly due to software patents. Software patents can get you prosecuted for publishing texts you wrote yourself."
Will Hurt Little Guys
According to organizers of the street protest, which will start at noon Wednesday in front of the European Parliament (EP) building in Brussels, the proposed law, called a directive, will hurt small developers.
The directive "would impose U.S.-style unlimited patentability of algorithms and business methods such as Amazon One-Click shopping," Benjamin Henrion, one of the protest organizers, said in a statement.
"Leaders of the scientific communities and software business world took the directive proposal apart and condemned it in every respect," he added. "Yet in June the EP Legal Affairs Commission endorsed this proposal with further amendments that make it even worse."
Scientists Rap Directive
Earlier this year, 31 scientists signed a petition submitted to the EP calling for the legislative body to "make impossible, clearly, for today and tomorrow, any patenting of the underlying ideas of software or algorithms, of information processing methods, of
representation of information and data, and of the interaction between human beings and computers."
In a FAQ on the issue, the European Union said the proposed directive is necessary to harmonize what has become a "bundle of national patents which have to be validated, maintained and litigated separately in each Member State."
Without a directive on these kinds of patents, the EU contends, the scope of what can and cannot be patented will fall to the judicial bodies of the European Patent Office without the opportunity for "coherent political reflection" based on the big picture.
"The proposed Directive therefore sets clear borders to what would be patentable in the EU and what would not," the EU said.
But opponents of the directive argue those borders will be the walls of a coffin for EU software developers and small businesses, which will have to compete in a U.S.-style system in which large companies use patents to squeeze licensing fees from smaller competitors.
That characterization of the U.S. market appears alien to some intellectual property experts. "I haven't seen that in my experience," Matthew Sampson, a partner with the law firm of McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, told TechNewsWorld. "I've seen a number of small companies take advantage of patent protections here."
Diverging Paths
Presently, Sampson asserted, the EU and the United States are on diverging paths with respect to the protectability of software, and particularly business methods. At this point, he said, the United States affords significantly broader patent protection to software.
"The European Patent Office has adopted rules stating that it will not even conduct a search on patents directed solely to software," he noted.
If the proposed directive became law, he said, it would bring the EU "back into alignment with the broader protection that's available here."
Welcome Development
That would be a welcome prospect for some IP lawyers on the U.S. side of the
Atlantic.
"I welcome the anticipated lessening of barriers to business method software
patents in the EU," Kent Genin, a litigator with Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, an intellectual property law firm in Chicago, told TechNewsWorld. "There should be more
opportunities to protect business models and more incentive to invest in
software development, generally."
Don't Need Protecting
Some software EU developers, though, want no part of any security that the proposed directive would provide them.
"We believe the directive will open the floodgates for software patents in
Europe," maintained Håkon Wium Lie, chief technology officer of Opera Software, maker of a Web browser by that name.
"This is a threat both to open-source developers -- who clearly cannot afford to pay licence fees -- and to companies like Opera Software," he continued. "We don't need the 'protection' that the directive wants to give us. We prefer to protect our innovations like a long-distance runner: by being faster than our competitors."
"Also," he added, "software patents threaten the Web as an open
infrastructure where everyone can participate, since open standards are
blocked by software patents."
I have a degree in computer science and a degree in law. What I know as a certainty based on ...
Next Article in Software
Infopath and OneNote Headline Microsoft Office 2003 August 21, 2003
"But the software wasn't by any stretch impossible to use," Michael Desmond, author of Microsoft Office 2003 in 10 Steps or Less, told TechNewsWorld. "For IT managers who are looking for a way to use XML in more processes, there's some real potential there."
Related Stories
Marching to a Different DRM August 21, 2003
Apple's iTunes service does use DRM technology -- for example, users may not e-mail downloaded music files to unlimited numbers of other users, although they may burn unlimited copies of files to CDs. Still, the company's approach is far less restrictive than that of its competitors.
SCO Claims Copyright Trumps GPL August 15, 2003
In defense of the GPL, Red Hat and IBM have countersued SCO, using the GPL as the basis for complaints and claiming that SCO has violated the license under which it accepted Linux contributions and distributed Linux.
Linux Community Mounts Fight, SCO Responds August 08, 2003
Companies that sell Linux products -- plus nearly the entire open-source software community -- have rallied around the countersuits against SCO.
Big Blue Hits SCO with Patent Counterclaim August 07, 2003
The lisense debate and the legal battle, with a court date in 2005, have the attention of the industry, which also is watching how Linux is progressing deeper into enterprise computing.
Red Hat Goes on Offensive with SCO Suit August 05, 2003
Red Hat's complaint contains seven individual allegations, two aimed at proving that its products do not infringe on SCO's patents and the other five seeking injunctions and remedial action for claims that Red Hat Linux borrows from Unix.
More by John P. Mello Jr.
VMware Fuses Performance With Convenience November 16, 2009
Fusion 3.0, the latest virtualization app from VMware that lets Mac users run Windows alongside OS X, puts an emphasis on performance. VMware built it specifically to leverage the 64-bit capabilities of Snow Leopard with a new 64-bit native engine. Its Migration Assistant for Windows lets Mac switchers recreate their old Windows PC inside a Mac, file by file.
Mouse Meets Multi-Touch November 09, 2009
Apple's latest peripheral, the Magic Mouse, takes the concept of multi-touch that the iPhone and iPod touch popularized and merges it with a button-free mouse. As one's mouse is a direct point of contact between human and machine, any changes made to it can be a divisive issue. Some users love the new abilities Magic Mouse brings to the table; others just can't stand the thing.
Samsung Intrepid: Sleek Hardware Makes Up For Uncomfy OS November 09, 2009
Samsung has built its Intrepid smartphone with a solid set of hardware. Its physical keyboard is comfortable for thumb-typing, and its camera sports a number of advanced features for a phone cam. The Windows Mobile 6.5 OS it's saddled with can be uncomfortable and unintuitive at times, but it may be at least a familiar interface for the business users the Intrepid targets.