By Jay Lyman LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
09/28/06 2:23 PM PT
IBM this week filed for summary judgment in its ongoing legal battle with SCO, which sued Big Blue in 2003 claiming that the technology giant inappropriately ported SCO's Unix code to Linux code.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
Like many in the technology industry and legal community, IBM (NYSE: IBM) is wondering when the US$5 billion lawsuit the SCO Group has filed against it -- for alleged breach of contract and the incorporation of SCO code in Linux -- is going to end.
SCO, a Utah-based company that was once a major player in the Unix server market, sued IBM in 2003 claiming that the firm inappropriately ported SCO's Unix code to Linux code before distributing it freely to developers.
Failed to Comply
Big Blue this week filed for summary judgement in the three-and-a-half-year-old case, arguing for dismissal of SCO's claims on the basis that it has largely failed to back them up with evidence in court. Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells ruled in June that the firm had "willfully failed to comply" with court orders to show IBM which lines of computer code included in Linux had been misappropriated.
In reaction to IBM's latest filing, SCO filed motions of its own to uphold its claims. No hearing has yet been set to review either of the firms' recent filings, though a 2007 trial date has been set for the case itself that remains intact for now.
Legal and industry observers, however, believe the case may be all but finished for SCO, especially in light of Wells' ruling a few months ago.
"The absence of evidence is the absence of evidence," Townsend and Townsend partner and software legal expert Phil Albert told LinuxInsider. "With all of the evidence before the court, it's clear IBM should win."
Higher Profile
IBM's summary judgement motion indicates the company remains confident it will ultimately prevail, said Albert. Most people he talks to, in fact, are surprised to hear that the case is still ongoing, he added.
"I don't think anyone's paying any attention to it anymore," he said.
The bar is set rather high for summary judgement, but Albert said it was possible the court would decide to throw out the case, given SCO's failure to produce evidence as requested.
SCO's intellectual property lawsuits may have actually helped to usher in a greater acceptance of open source in the enterprise, Burton Group Vice President of Service Operations Gary Hein told LinuxInsider. The case has brought visibility to enterprise-level Linux deployment and helped clarify intellectual property issues related to open source code that may have mystified IT execs in the past.
The adoption of open source in the enterprise has gained higher visibility and been treated with a higher level of professionalism, Hein said. "It strengthened the position of open source in the enterprise. A lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt has been dismissed or adequately handled by enterprises."
IBM's motion for summary judgement comes as no surprise to Hein and echoes what most in the industry are saying.
"I think this is just validation of what many of us have believed for some time: stick a fork in it. It's done," he said.
Sun Sticks to Slow, Steady Road for Open Sourcing Java August 31, 2006
"For the marketplace to absorb it, it should come out fairly quickly, but more importantly, completely," Interarbor Solutions Principal Analyst Dana Gardner told LinuxInsider. Sun Microsystems' open sourcing of Java could increase Java innovation and ease of use if done right, he said.
Related Stories
SCO Group Claims IBM Destroyed Evidence July 24, 2006
SCO has filed a claim purporting that IBM destroyed certain software code as part of its appeal of a decision in its patent infringement case with IBM. SCO claims that IBM had not handed over certain materials requested in discovery, according to a filing made on July 17, and that an IBM engineer admitted in a deposition that IBM had destroyed certain software code.
SCO's Future Murky Following Legal Blow July 04, 2006
It is unclear how SCO will continue to fund its legal battles: Its cash reserves are disappearing at a rapid pace, while its losses have accelerated over the last year, in large part due to its legal expenses. If not a death knell, the dismissal of most of its claims against IBM is a major blow to its prospects.
Related News Alerts
More by Jay Lyman
Open Source Developer Dumps Novell Over Microsoft Deal December 26, 2006
A key open source developer, Jeremy Allison, who cofounded the Samba project, has resigned from Novell in protest over the company's recent agreement to enter a collaborative arrangement with Microsoft. The deal has created an uproar in the open source community because it does not treat all recipients of the GPL equally and thus violates the spirit of the license, critics say.
Financial Firms Tap Microsoft for Linux December 22, 2006
Three major financial institutions are among the first companies to go to Microsoft for Linux services, provided through an agreement the software giant struck with Novell. Although a recent survey showed customer approval of the collaboration, many members of the open source community view Novell's move as sleeping with the devil.
Mozilla Beefs Up Security in Firefox 2.0 December 21, 2006
Mozilla's latest update to its open source Firefox browser includes security measures targeting phishers. Phishing scams that use social engineering techniques to dupe Web surfers into revealing personal financial information have become an effective way for cybercriminals to conduct their nefarious activities on the Internet.