LEGAL

Jobs, Apple Brass Summoned to Testify in Backdating Suit

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Digg It
Reprints

Another stock option backdating suit against Apple has surfaced. The plaintiff, the Boston Retirement Board, has issued summons to testify to chief executive Steve Jobs and several other former Apple board members. The group reportedly claims this suit is different than others because it offers evidence from an investigation into confidential records.


BuyDomains is the world's leading marketplace for premium domains with over 800,000 domain names for sale. BuyDomains' domain experts have helped thousands of businesses locate the perfect domain - let us help yours!

The Boston Retirement Board is pursuing a stock option backdating lawsuit against Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) Latest News about Apple, and has issued summons to testify to CEO Steve Jobs as well as several other current and former board members from the company.

The suit alleges that the company's accounting practices cost over US$105 million in extra value for backdated stock options issued to Jobs.

Along with Jobs, William Campbell, Millard Drexler, Arthur Levinson, Jerome York, Gareth Chang, Edgar Wollard, Fred Anderson and Nancy Heinen have all been summoned to testify in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara.

Looking Back

Apple revealed in June 2006 that certain backdated stock option grants issued to company executives between 1997 and 2001 had been improperly backdated. Jobs received some of those grants, but later surrendered them to the company and was cleared of any wrongdoing by an internally commissioned independent investigation.

So far none of the suits brought against Apple for its backdating actions have gained any ground against the Mac and iPod maker. To date, the cases have either stalled because of a lack of evidence, or have been dismissed outright like the New York City Employees' Retirement System suit.

Confidential Records

This new suit, however, claims to be different because it offers evidence obtained from an investigation into confidential records, according to FindLaw.com.

Since the evidence found in those records may still be considered confidential by the court, the group may have to file an amendment or present their findings in a sealed version of the case.

According to the retirement group, "The documents Apple has produced provide critical details about Apple's backdating practices and confirm that all of Apple's directors were aware of and participated in the backdating scheme."

Apple is following its standard company policy regarding pending litigation and is not commenting on the case.

© 2008 The Mac Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2008 ECT News Network. All rights reserved.

Letters: Click here to send a letter to the editor...

Print Version E-Mail Article Digg It Reprints Related Stories   RSS

Related News Alerts

Apple Activate Alert | Search Archives

Related Resources

Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]