By Chris Maxcer MacNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
03/13/08 1:22 PM PT
Though Apple's iTunes and iPod have been on the market for several years, a company called "ZapMedia Services" has recently accused the Mac maker of patent infringement. Why the holdup? It seems one of the patents crucial to ZapMedia's case was awarded just this week, even though the company says it applied for it years ago.
ZapMedia Services has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) for unspecified damages related to Apple's iTunes and related media players, most notably the iPod.
ZapMedia said it made multiple attempts to resolve its patent-related concerns, as well as license its system directly to Apple, but was rebuffed by the company.
ZapMedia, which is the predecessor of ZapMedia Services, created a platform and vision for the enjoyment of digital media assets, the company has claimed. In connection with this vision, ZapMedia said it "developed a system by which it could provide hardware, software and content to consumers to allow them to gain control over their digital media assets."
To protect this intellectual property, ZapMedia obtained U.S. Patent Nos. 7,020,704 (for "system and method for distributing media assets to user devices via a portal synchronized by said user devices") and 7,343,414 (for "system and method for distributing media assets to user devices and managing user rights of the media assets.")
Patent 7,020,704 was granted March 28, 2006, while Patent 7,343,414 was approved on March 11, 2008, though ZapMedia apparently filed its first patent in October of 2000 and waited several years before it was granted.
Shopping the Vision - No Buyers
ZapMedia said it met with many major technology and media companies around the globe, including Apple, describing its vision in great detail in the late 1990s. "Without asking ZapMedia for permission, Apple subsequently unveiled its own system. Apple announced its iPod MP3 player with an integrated iTunes software application in October of 2001 and its iTunes store in April 2003," ZapMedia noted.
The suit was filed in the Marshall Division of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which happens to be a district that historically has favored plaintiffs in patent-infringement cases.
"The Complaint alleges that ZapMedia Services' property is being exploited in a manner which is unlawful, and by law, ZapMedia Services is therefore entitled to a reasonable royalty on Apple's revenues related to the infringement," noted Steven G. Hill, of Hill, Kertscher and Wharton, lead litigation counsel to ZapMedia Services.
Dating to June 2006 and continuing through the fall of 2007, ZapMedia said it made Apple aware of the patents and their availability for license. "When someone takes our vision and our intellectual property without a license after several attempts, we have no option but to protect it through every means available to us," Robert J. Frohwein, general counsel of ZapMedia Services, noted.
Apple did not respond to a request for comment. The company typically does not comment on pending litigation.
What About Other Tech Giants?
Other technology giants like Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) have models similar to Apple's. Where Apple has the iPod, Microsoft has the Zune. Where Apple uses iTunes, Microsoft uses its Zune Marketplace. Might there be other technology companies that could face similar lawsuits?
"At this point in time, our focus in on the Apple suit," Frohwein told MacNewsWorld. "We will not comment as to whether and to what extent there is other infringement existing in the marketplace."
Critical Timing
While it seems odd to see a patent infringement lawsuit so long after the launch of Apple's iTunes store and iPod devices, some of the delay may be attributed to the U.S. Patent Office and its application processing speed.
"Patents can take several years to issue at this time," Frohwein said. "We are aware that the patent office is taking strides to expedite this process and hope that it is successful in doing so."
Frohwein declined to comment further into the specifics of the pending litigation.
MPAA Chief: Net Neutrality Hamstrings Antipiracy Efforts March 13, 2008
The broader issue that the Federal Communications Commission is currently trying to address is the question of what constitutes reasonable network management, said Jerry Ellig, senior research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center and former deputy director of the FTC's office of policy planning.
Related Stories
Lionsgate Bundles iTunes Versions With DVDs March 10, 2008
"This is an idea that has been kicked around for a while," said John Barrett, director of research with Parks Associates. It's a "tough sell" convincing people to buy an iTunes version of a movie rather than get the DVD and be able to watch it on their TV at home. "People are afraid of being tied to the platform," he said.
iTunes Comes Up Short on Movie Rental Goals March 04, 2008
"Old-school content distribution contracts have to expire or be bought out," professor Mark Meckler said. "The big rental companies ... have contracts with the movie production houses and library rights owners that give them certain priorities as rental outlets. These distribution and revenue sharing contracts are the result of major negotiations and are pretty much iron-clad."
Mac Bloggers Toast iTunes, Probe Penryn Processors, Sweat iPhone SDK February 29, 2008
Apple was quick to brag about the latest findings from the NPD Group this week. The research firm ranked Apple's iTunes as the No. 2 music retailer in the U.S., second only to retail giant Wal-Mart. Apple said it has more than 50 million iTunes store customers who have together purchased more than 4 billion songs. Plus, Apple bragged, iTunes sold 20 million songs on Christmas Day of 2007.
Related News Alerts
More by Chris Maxcer
The iPad's Cruel Teaser March 09, 2010
The iPad ad that debuted on Sunday was remarkable in how many functions it managed to cram into just 30 seconds. Document creation, email, e-books, media viewing -- all that and more was demoed using just two hands and a hip soundtrack. However, the ad left quite a few important questions about the iPad unanswered.
The iPad Catalyst Will Light a Lot of Fires March 02, 2010
I think we're going to get a lot of fantastic content options for mobile devices in 2010, even if you don't pony up for an iPad. While the iPad will likely be a raging success, it'll also help generate a market for alternatives. The question is, can we credit -- or blame -- the iPad for generating all this mobile action? Maybe not the iPad alone, but it's certainly the latest catalyst.
With Smut Ban, App Store Exposes a Jiggly Set of Rules February 23, 2010
Apple's stance on risque iPhone and iPod touch apps is understandable, but the whole incident does underscore the App Store's frustratingly fickle nature. Apple should either draw up a precise, crystal-clear set of guidelines for app developers or just admit it's completely subjective -- "If we like it, it's in; if we don't, it's rejected." Right now, its policy seems to be somewhere in between.