By Jay Lyman TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
12/22/05 1:19 PM PT
"There are incentives, but in the U.S. -- with 85 percent of people subscribing to paid TV services -- it's hard to see direct over-the-air TV service having much impact in the future," Yankee Group research director Adi Kishore told TechNewsWorld.
Run Your Entire Contact Center in the Cloud Many businesses are increasingly seeking ways to improve the quality, flexibility, and scalability of their traditional call centers. Download this free white paper and learn the top 8 reasons to consider going virtual.
The U.S. Congress is plotting out the transition from today's over-the-air analog broadcast television to digital television -- setting a 2009 date and the basic structure for assisting consumers who do not have satellite or cable TV service.
While these are necessary first steps, there are still a number of unresolved issues. One concerns who will pay for the upgrade to digital TV. Another question is whether over-the-air broadcasters would be allowed to multicast their advertising-supported programming, which would mean multiple program choices within broadcast channels and a heavier burden on competing cable providers.
No matter how such issues play out, tomorrow's free TV is likely to look a lot different than today's, and not just in terms of picture quality.
"There are incentives, but in the U.S. -- with 85 percent of people subscribing to paid TV services -- it's hard to see direct over-the-air TV service having much impact in the future," Yankee Group research director Adi Kishore told TechNewsWorld.
Time for a Change
Although it has not yet been signed into law, perhaps the most concrete component of the planned transition to digital television is a Senate-approved deadline of February 2009, by which all television broadcasts in the U.S. would have to be digital.
Another big issue in the transition is the upgrade of consumer television sets, which would require the addition of set-top boxes to receive the new digital signals. While Congress has signaled that it may aside around US$1.5 billion to help subsidize the transition, consumer groups have complained that the figure -- which pales in comparison to the revenue from auctioning the old analog spectrum -- would not be enough.
How the over-the-air television of tomorrow will be regulated is yet another issue. At present, cable providers remain unregulated, but they may be providing the same type of service as over-the-air broadcasters after the transition.
Lack of Strategy
While setting a date for the analog cutoff and allocating money for transition subsidies are necessary steps, Kishore noted, there are many remaining issues in the upgrade to digital TV.
"I think there's still some lack of strategy in how the transition is going to take place," he commented.
The 15 percent of Americans who do not subscribe to cable or satellite television services are not the only ones who will have to upgrade their television viewing equipment, Kishore pointed out, referring to cable customers with analog boxes.
Also at issue are whether broadcasters will be able to sell additional programming and how cable companies will carry extra digital channels for which they do not have the capacity, Kishore said.
Referring to the increasing opportunities to deliver television over broadband Internet connections, Kishore said there are a myriad of problems yet to be resolved in the transition.
Transition Will Happen
Regardless of the impediments, the legislated transition to digital TV will take place, Gartner (NYSE: IT) analyst Laura Behrens told TechNewsWorld.
"Whether it will happen smoothly -- and who will end up paying for it -- remains to be seen," she said, calling the deadline and subsidy structure "only the first of several things that have to happen."
The biggest question may be "digital multicasting must-carry," or whether cable operators will be required to carry multiple interactive channels from broadcast networks, Behrens said.
"These bills don't address that at all," she noted, referring to the legislation currently under debate. "That is a huge part of how smooth the transition will be for broadcasters and what people will see come 2009."
Texas Files Second Lawsuit Against Sony December 22, 2005
"We keep discovering additional methods Sony used to deceive Texas consumers who thought they were simply buying music," Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said. "Thousands of Texans are now potential victims of this deceptive game Sony played with consumers for its own purposes."
Related Stories
MPAA Applauds Digital Content Security Act December 20, 2005
The film industry applauded the Digital Transition Content Security Act, with MPAA Chairman Dan Glickman calling it a "very important piece of legislation that will promote more consumer choice as it protects copyright owners in the digital age." But not everyone is so enthusiastic.
Theater Companies Join To Speed Digital Cinema December 16, 2005
Theaters stand to gain from the move to digitization in two ways: by attracting more moviegoers with better quality projection and by incurring lower distribution expenses, said Yankee Group senior analyst Mike Goodman. However, the costs of upgrading may outweigh the benefits, he noted.
Intel, Microsoft To Debut 'Digital Joy' Campaign November 04, 2004
Microsoft corporate Vice President Tom Button said his company and Intel want consumers to realize how PCs can help them get the most out of their entertainment experiences, from digital movies and music to photos and TV programs. "Microsoft and Intel share a common vision on how to deliver these benefits to consumers," Button said.
Digital Television Liberation Project Launched July 06, 2004
"Broadcast television has always been free and unencrypted," EFF Staff Attorney Wendy Seltzer told TechNewsWorld. "Historically, we've been able to do whatever we want with that signal within the limits of copyright law."
CDIA's Bob Daniels on Digital Imaging Trends June 25, 2004
"Apple addresses the needs of creative professionals in a way that other companies just don't. Part of this is because they're so involved in creating the software as well as the hardware. That makes it hard for them to point a finger at a third party if anything goes wrong," CDIA executive director Bob Daniels told MacNewsWorld in an exclusive interview.
Related News Alerts
More by Jay Lyman
Open Source Developer Dumps Novell Over Microsoft Deal December 26, 2006
A key open source developer, Jeremy Allison, who cofounded the Samba project, has resigned from Novell in protest over the company's recent agreement to enter a collaborative arrangement with Microsoft. The deal has created an uproar in the open source community because it does not treat all recipients of the GPL equally and thus violates the spirit of the license, critics say.
Financial Firms Tap Microsoft for Linux December 22, 2006
Three major financial institutions are among the first companies to go to Microsoft for Linux services, provided through an agreement the software giant struck with Novell. Although a recent survey showed customer approval of the collaboration, many members of the open source community view Novell's move as sleeping with the devil.
Mozilla Beefs Up Security in Firefox 2.0 December 21, 2006
Mozilla's latest update to its open source Firefox browser includes security measures targeting phishers. Phishing scams that use social engineering techniques to dupe Web surfers into revealing personal financial information have become an effective way for cybercriminals to conduct their nefarious activities on the Internet.