Welcome | Sign In
ECommerceTimes.com
Tech Buzz

OPINION
Will Google Learn Government 101?

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Will Google Learn Government 101?

For all the dangers that might lurk in the rigors of the competitive marketplace, government control is a worse fate. Microsoft experienced years of antitrust issues that still dog the company, and the telecom sector felt it with price controls from the 1996 telecommunications act. Now Google faces problems with building the citywide WiFi network it thought San Francisco would expedite. When will these companies ever learn?


eMarketer Whitepaper: Optimizing the E-Commerce Experience
From the Web to the Contact Center, are you prepared to proactively engage and keep your savvy customers? Read how e-commerce leaders are optimizing their sites with ratings, reviews, live help, Web analytics, mobile and more.

A decade ago, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) thought it could ignore bureaucratic rumblings with little or no fallout. That attitude led to the historic Microsoft antitrust trial and the realization that bureaucrats can indeed wield bigtime impact. Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) is now learning a similar lesson, albeit in a different way.

In the race to provide WiFi access to Internet users, one strategy that looked like a shortcut was to partner with government bodies that seemed inclined to offer a near monopoly to companies who agreed to provide citywide wireless Internet service for "free." In April of 2006, Google was awarded permission to build such a network in conjunction with EarthLink (Nasdaq: ELNK).

Bait and Switch

Local governments control the so-called "rights of way" for companies to set up their broadband wireless equipment throughout a city. When a company is awarded the main rights-of-way permissions, one might think that future service provision would be in the bag. In a world where everyone followed the Google motto, "don't be evil," that would be the case, but in San Francisco, reality has set in for the search giant.

Chris Sacca, Google's special projects leader, recently voiced frustration with the city of San Francisco's slow negotiating style. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Sacca complained that "talks to come up with a final contract have advanced little since they started, and officials have made unreasonable demands, including a request for free computers and a share in revenues."

It is interesting to see how the city's original goal of "solving the digital divide" has morphed into delays and demands for money and free goodies. What truly shocks is that Google actually seems surprised that the city is pulling a bait-and-switch job on it. Cable operators were subject to such outrageous demands for years, so it is quite amazing that Google didn't see this coming. And Google is making this mistake on the national level too when it comes to "net neutrality," an effort to expand government reach in the Internet marketplace.

Trusting Wisely

Google and other Internet companies, such as eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), are worried that network providers like AT&T (NYSE: T) and Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSK) will block consumer access to Web pages if Web companies refuse to pay for future premium services. This future threat, Google and the rest argue, necessitates the need for government intervention. At this juncture, what Google executives need to consider is how much they can trust government to manage their interests.

If San Francisco is any indication, they should be running from net neutrality-based red tape as fast as they can. And given that the threat Google and eBay imagine has not even come close to happening, it looks a little crazy to be proposing such government supervision. At least 100 companies from the networking and communications sector tried to get this message across to Congress this week.

Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO), Nortel Networks (NYSE: NT), Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) and others signed a letter to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Democratic Leader Harry Reid saying that it was "too soon to enact network neutrality legislation." That's the diplomatic way of putting it.

No Free Lunch

What these companies know is that for all the dangers that might lurk in the rigors of the competitive marketplace, government control is a worse fate. Microsoft experienced years of antitrust issues that still dog the company, and the telecommunications sector felt it with price controls from the 1996 telecommunications act. Now Google faces problems with building the citywide WiFi network it thought the city would expedite. When will these companies ever learn?

There really is no such thing as a free lunch. When a deal Increase Customer Sales with Email Marketing -- Free Trial from VerticalResponse looks too good to be true, it probably is. Politicians make their living by promising the world and delivering little, but technology executives should be smart enough to see through those tricks. It's time for Google and other tech firms to wake up and fix their mistakes before it's too late. Broadband access, WiFi or not, depends on it.


Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute.


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Sonia Arrison


Talkback: Join the Discussion.
Re: Will Google Learn Government 101?
mrinternet
Posted 2006-09-27
First off Internet users DO NOT WANT TV VIDEO streaming on their computers... see recent study ...

More by Sonia Arrison

How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue
October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules
September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley?
August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network