Welcome | Sign In
ECommerceTimes.com
Tech Buzz

OPINION
Cable Reform: From California to Congress

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Cable Reform: From California to Congress

The Federal Communications Commission notes that in the limited areas where "overbuild" cable competition existed, cable prices dropped 15 to 27 percent. When real competition comes into play, the drop in prices and accompanying increase in quality should be even better. But the effects of California's cable reform measure will carry far beyond the state.


Reading the Avaya-Nortel Roadmap requires a navigator
The release of the Avaya-Nortel roadmap has many people wondering what lies ahead for their customer contact initiatives. Join Ovum’s Ian Jacobs and Aspect CTO Gary Barnett to discuss how the integration of two product lines may affect you. Register for the webinar.

Hold on to your hats -- California lawmakers have finally done something even the most jaded critic will appreciate. It's called cable franchise reform, and it will have a positive impact on California and the entire nation.

"California has led the way in the evolution of new technology, and with this bill, our state's policy towards contemporary TV and entertainment technology is catching up to the times," said Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles.

Click here for LiveOps

Removing the Monopoly

Indeed, it was past time for lawmakers to remove the monopoly that local governments had created for cable services. Not only have cable television rates shot up almost 86 percent over the last 10 years, without significant improvement in service, but competitors to this dysfunctional system have been clamoring to get in. The situation was so dire that both parties overwhelmingly supported the new bill, with even leftist Democrats such as Sen. Marta Escutia coming on board.

The bill, AB 2987, will create a statewide video franchise system run by the Public Utilities Commission. Franchises, which are essentially permission from the government for companies to enter the market, will be awarded 44 days after receipt of a complete application and will remain valid for ten years.

These clear rules replace the old system of cable providers having to negotiate with each of the thousands of municipalities that would often drag their feet and demand unrelated favors such as building parking lots and planting trees.

The California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, the National Council on Aging, and the Rainbow/PUSH coalition joined 250 other groups along with AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon in rallying for change. One seldom sees that combination, so the governor's signature will be a no-brainer. The benefits are huge, of course, starting with the biggie of jobs.

New Competition

AT&T has already said that it will invest an additional US$1 billion in California, and Steven Pociask of TeleNomic Research has estimated that franchise reform will create 10,400 new California jobs. The jobs will be good ones, paying 77 percent above the national average wage. Consumers will also be huge winners.

The mere introduction of competition into a system where almost none existed will cause radical change. University of California, Berkeley professor Yale Braunstein estimates a windfall of $1 billion, with a savings of $162 million to $237 million in the San Francisco area and $320 million to $469 million in the Los Angeles area. Such price savings have happened before, albeit on a smaller scale.

The Federal Communications Commission notes that in the limited areas where "overbuild" cable competition existed, cable prices dropped 15 to 27 percent. When real competition comes into play, the drop in prices and accompanying increase in quality should be even better. But the effects of California's cable reform measure will carry far beyond the state.

Congress is currently considering cable franchise reform at the national level and, as one might imagine, there are a number of political "compromises" on the table. One of the current stumbling blocks is that legislators from rural areas have indicated that in order to get their votes, cable franchise reformers need to add universal service pork to the bill. That's tough to swallow, as universal service taxes have nearly doubled in the last eight years and the program is rife with corruption.

States Pass Reforms

Fortunately, the passage of California's bill greatly decreases the incentive for such bad compromises, as it increases the number of customers that can already be reached without national legislation. For instance, now that California has reformed, AT&T can enter the video market for more than half their customers. That's because Texas, Indiana, Kansas, and Connecticut also passed statewide franchising rules. Verizon's market is looking good too, with reforms in Virginia, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont.

There was talk a while ago about Governor Schwarzenegger wanting to enter national politics. That remains to be seen, but by signing this bill he will certainly have made a difference for the nation.


Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute.


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Sonia Arrison


Talkback: Join the Discussion.
Re: Cable Reform: From California to Congress
alise
Posted 2008-01-06
Razzlefratz. at&t has already shown its true colours by refusing to follow the new law. ...
Re: Cable Reform: From California to Congress
toddpthayer
Posted 2006-09-13
It's been interesting to watch almost complete lack of journalistic coverage on this legislation ...

More by Sonia Arrison

The Trouble With Augmented Reality and Other Cool Tech
February 24, 2010
New technologies that allow users to interact with one another in virtual settings are undoubtedly cool, but augmented reality is served best with a heavy dollop of privacy -- or at least, choice. Social networking fans like Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg may believe that the new social norm is making one's personal life fully public, but the recent uproar over Buzz suggests that he's dead wrong.
Is Personalized Medicine Anti-Establishment?
January 27, 2010
Affordable genome sequencing is coming soon, but few doctors appear ready to deal with the difficult issues this technology could raise. Suppose a doctor sequences a genome for cardiac data, but finds genes indicating a very high cancer risk in the process. Would the doctor have an obligation to tell the patient? "Doctors aren't prepared for these big conversations," said Stanford law professor Hank Greeley.
Net's Top Two Powerhouse Players Talk Policy
December 18, 2009
Intellectual property was at the heart of many discussions at this year's U.S.-China Internet Industry Forum. Though the software piracy rate currently stands at 80 percent in China, there are hopeful signs. Now that it is moving toward a knowledge-based economy, the realization is dawning that it's in China's own best interests to do a better job of protecting IP.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Free eBook: Secure Your Datacenter
Click here to download today.
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network