By Paul Murphy LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
11/11/04 5:00 AM PT
A lot of business processes now limited by technology costs and software complexity can be simplified right down to affordability. That's what Solaris 10 is really about, and the 10-year impact is likely to be like nothing we've seen before.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
The newly released Solaris 10 includes a radical new technology called DTrace which lets you look inside the usual black box of a running production application to see exactly where the bottlenecks are and what their impact is. As a result, I've been telling clients with big Solaris operations that they should dedicate a machine with at least two US3 or later CPUs to Solaris 10 and use it to train their people on Solaris 10 and DTrace by having them test all major systems.
It's easy to explain the value of stuff like that to management. For the IT people, you just talk about combining hardware and licensing dollar savings with increased deployment flexibility -- and for senior management you correlate software quality with reductions in error and failure risks. Either way, you're really talking about software which enables operational improvements within Sun's existing customer base, and that, I'm sure, is why Sun is energetically marketing these new capabilities.
Look a bit deeper, however, and there's so much more in Solaris 10 that the release should eventually become known as SunOS 3.0. (Note: SunOS 1.0 went to release 4.1.4 with its successor, Solaris, initially known as SunOS 5.0 and then relabeled as Solaris 2. Despite marketing's best efforts, therefore, releases up to 2.8 were publicly known as 2.X ,with 8 and 9 still known internally as 2.8 and 2.9, respectively.)
Deeper Innovations
Hot, new intrinsic capabilities like DTrace, ZFS and the ability to run Linux binaries are the realizations of deeper technological innovations like microstate accounting. Solaris 10 brings a lot of those out of the labs and into production environments where they'll receive the kind of intensive real world testing that will ultimately determine how important they are. Consider, for example, this list of Solaris 10 top 11-20 new features put together by Adam Leventhal (one of the key developers behind DTrace):
libumem -- the tool for debugging dynamic allocation problems; oh, and it scales as well or better than any other memory allocator.
pfiles(1) with file names -- you can get at the file name info through /proc, too; very cool.
Improved coreadm(1M) -- core files are now actually useful on other machines, administrators and users can specify the content of core files.
System V IPC -- no more clumsy system tunables and reboots, it's all dynamic, and -- guess what? -- faster too.
kmdb -- if you don't care, OK, but if you do care, you really, really care: mdb(1)'s cousin replaces kadb(1M).
Watchpoints -- now they work and they scale.
pstack(1) for java -- see java stack frames in a JVM or core file and through Dtrace.
pmap(1) features -- see thread stacks, and core file content.
per-thread p-tools -- apply pstack(1) and truss(1) to just the threads you care about.
Event Ports -- a generic API for dealing with heterogeneous event sources.
Things like these are invisible to IT management and of little importance to the press, but this is the stuff on which technology revolutions like DTrace and ZFS are built. Thus, their presence in this release signals the importance of Solaris 10, not as an end product but as a work in progress.
Systemwide Functionality
To me it seems that Sun is driving toward what I think of as Plan-9 compliance; not at the code level but in terms of systemwide functionality. Plan 9, you might recall, is a kind of second generation Unix liberated from the single machine focus of the original design to make full use of multiple machines on a network. Originally, Sun's marketing people said that "the network is the computer"; realistically, Plan 9 reverses that to make it: "the computer is the network" -- and that's exactly what's going on with Solaris.
Adam Leventhal's list, above, reflects the achievements of people working to put in place the foundations for future software, while the forthcoming Niagara and later SPARC designs do the same thing at the hardware level -- putting the equivalent of a traditional 32-way SMP box into a single processor.
Bring them together in production systems and what do you get? The ability to organize your business around a single physical computer redundantly implemented in processors spread across your network -- meaning that a lot of business processes now limited by technology costs and software complexity can be simplified right down to affordability. That's what Solaris 10 is really about, and the 10-year impact is likely to be like nothing we've seen before.
Paul Murphy, a LinuxInsider columnist, wrote and published The Unix Guide to Defenestration. Murphy is a 20-year veteran of the IT consulting industry, specializing in Unix and Unix-related management issues.
Salesforce.com Ups the Ante in IT November 10, 2004
Salesforce.com has added a new service that it calls CustomForce.com, which is designed to enable developers to add onto the basic functionality of the core CRM product or to develop completely new applications. The company that challenged the established order within the CRM market has now set its sights on challenging the established order everywhere else in IT.
Related Stories
Sun Stalls on Open-Source Solaris November 05, 2004
IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky told LinuxInsider that Sun has repeatedly said and done things that set the teeth of the open-source community on edge. "I'm not sure that Sun is going to reach its hand out and say let's create a brotherhood of Solaris and go forward," Kusnetzky said.
Sun Lures Developers with Open-Source Solaris November 02, 2004
Although Sun may not be able to dam the surge behind Linux, it can still be a survivor, said Dwight Davis of Summit Strategies. "I don't think Sun can counter the entire Linux trend and the momentum for that operating system, but I think they can make a good case for a battle-tested, commercial version of Unix as an alternative to Linux."
Can Sun Emulate Linux by Open-Sourcing Solaris? June 15, 2004
While we can only speculate about Sun's motivations, it is fair to point out that emulation is a sign of respect. We emulate mentors, teachers or role models. Imitation, on the other hand, is a sign of flattery. We imitate rivals or competitors. Perhaps, in the long run, this distinction will provide all the insight we need into Sun's decision.
Sun's Plans To Open Source Solaris Questionable June 04, 2004
"I think they're wasting their time," Harvard Research Group vice president of Linux strategy Bill Claybrook told LinuxInsider. "If they had released the source code for Solaris four to five years ago, like they first talked about, ... and directed it to Intel, they would have killed Linux, because right now Solaris is a better operating system than Linux."
More by Paul Murphy
Pricing a Dual CPU Server February 03, 2005
I'm a SPARC bigot, so the first machine I looked at was the Ultrasparc III based Sun 250. At US$8,045 list, this thing offers a tremendous track record for reliability, Solaris 9, dual 1.28 GHz US3 CPUs, 4 GB of RAM, dual 73 GB US320 disks, and a big machine architecture in a small tower.
Chickens, Eggs and Analyst Opinion January 27, 2005
The surprising thing about this isn't the effect it's having in setting HP up for dismemberment but the apparent total lack of reaction in the professional analyst community. This kind of self-serving behavior in the HP executive suite signals impending catastrophe, yet HP's stock barely wavered with the announcement.
Macintosh Justification January 20, 2005
You'll see that the underlying reason in almost every case where the Mac lost out to Wintel doesn't have anything to do with rational arguments based on cost, performance or functionality. Instead, Wintel proponents are shown as consistently fudging such arguments as rationales for decisions already made.