By Ben White TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
07/13/04 1:40 PM PT
Google spokesperson Cindy McCaffrey declined to say why the firm chose Nasdaq over the NYSE. Nasdaq conducts trading via a network of linked computers, while the NYSE connects buyers and sellers through a live auction on its LowerManhattan trading floor.
Internet search firm Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) said Monday it would list its hotly anticipated $2.7 billion initial public offering on the Nasdaq Stock Market, dealing a blow to the New York Stock Exchange, which had campaigned hard to win the coveted listing.
Both organizations had a lot at stake in the Google listing, which the Mountain View, Calif.-based company disclosed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The NYSE and Nasdaq fiercely compete for stock listings, which generate significant revenue as well as prestige. The NYSE earned 27 percent of its $1 billion in revenue last year from listing fees; Nasdaq earned close to 28 percent of its $590 million in revenue from such fees.
Google spokesperson Cindy McCaffrey declined to say why the firm chose Nasdaq over the NYSE. Nasdaq conducts trading via a network of linked computers, while the NYSE connects buyers and sellers through a live auction on its LowerManhattan trading floor.
Nasdaq Fighting Erosion
Nasdaq spokesperson Bethany Sherman also declined to comment. In a prepared statement, the NYSE said, "Google is an outstanding company with a great management team, and we wish the company well with its initial public offering."
Nasdaq is fighting erosion in market share to electronic communications networks. The NYSE is trying to emerge from the shadow of its former chairman, Dick Grasso, who was forced from office last summer after revelations of his $139.5 million pay package outraged investors.
In addition, five of the largest "specialist" firms that conduct trading on the NYSE floor agreed earlier this year to pay a total of $240 million to settle charges that they shortchanged investors by trading for their own accounts.
But while both firms courted Google, Wall Street observers said Nasdaq, traditional home to technology giants such as Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) and eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), had far more to lose than the NYSE had to gain.
Enormous IPO
"It's an enormous IPO and so whoever gets the listing is regarded as a big winner," said William Gorin, a partner at law firm Cleary, Gottlieb in New York and an expert in the IPO process. "But the NYSE already gets a very large percentage of major new listings, and Nasdaq relies more on technology and Internet deals."
Joseph Bartlett, a securities attorney with Fish and Richardson in New York, said Nasdaq was the natural home for Google, which plans to sell its IPO shares through an auction format rarely used in the United States. "The guys at Nasdaq are venture capital-type guys, entrepreneurs," he said. "Nasdaq has been the place where the [venture capital] community has been going for years."
Nonetheless, John A. Thain, who replaced Grasso as head of the NYSE, made no secret of his desire to win Google. Asked in May whether he was personally lobbying Google executives, Thain replied, "As you can imagine, this is important at the highest levels of the exchange." Thain's former firm, Goldman Sachs, failed to win a lead position managing Google's IPO.
Earning Wide Acclaim
Thain has a difficult act to follow when it comes to wooing new listings. Grasso earned wide acclaim for shifting the exchange's image from that of a stodgy home for established blue-chip companies to one of a vibrant haven for younger firms. Listings at the NYSE soared under Grasso's tenure, as the chairman made endless visits to corporate executives to win new business while making sure no existing NYSE companies jumped ship to Nasdaq.
But, while Thain may have failed in his efforts to win Google, a spokesperson said the NYSE has won listings from 28 of the 30 IPOs this year that met criteria for both the exchange and Nasdaq. Nasdaq, meanwhile, has won 77 of all 110 IPOs this year, a spokesperson said.
Executives close to the exchange and on Wall Street said that while the NYSE sent delegations to Mountain View and made a strong pitch, there was never much question that Google would eventually list on Nasdaq.
"I don't think that it was a real fight," said an executive close to the exchange, who declined to be named for fear of angering the NYSE or Google. "I don't know how easy it is to have a dialogue with [Google]. They don't talk to anyone. They don't even really talk to their bankers."
An executive at one of 30 securities firms helping bring Google public said the NYSE made a strong case but that the outcome was never in doubt. "I don't think it was ever close," said the executive, who asked not to be named for fear of raising Google's ire.
Analysts Speculate About Google's Choice of Nasdaq July 13, 2004
Google declined to comment on the Nasdaq listing choice. The Nasdaq selection might be a rare moment of pragmatism in what has been a highly unorthodox IPO process for Google, which began with the company's founders penning a lengthy "open letter" as part of its initial public offering filing. The open letter expounded on the firm's unconventional philosophy.
Related Stories
Stocks End Mixed, Google Chooses Nasdaq July 12, 2004
Google said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it would seek to become a member of the Nasdaq exchange when it pulls of its expected US$2.7 billion IPO. Google chose the tech-laden board over the New York Stock Exchange, which was openly courting the search engine company.
Adobe Charged with Patent Infringement July 09, 2004
Jupiter Research vice president Michael Gartenberg believes that to some degree, people need to consider the source of the lawsuit. He pointed out that Adobe is an industry heavyweight reporting profitable earnings, while the plaintiff, in contrast, is an unknown. "You don't sue poor people and poor companies. However, it is hard to imagine Adobe not prevailing in this case," Gartenberg told MacNewsWorld.
MSN Unveils Long-Awaited Search Upgrade July 01, 2004
The upgrade includes a policy decision from MSN, with so-called paid inclusion results eliminated. Results delivered from high scores for relevancy from algorithmic search engines will be separated from sponsored result listings as well, with sponsored listings shaded on all results pages.
Catherine Seda on Search Engine Marketing June 30, 2004
"Google is a hit with both consumers and search engine marketers," Catherine Seda told the E-Commerce Times. "The company has done an outstanding job blending natural listings with paid listings in its search results. Because the results in both areas are highly relevant, a growing number of consumers continue to use Google and buy from the sites listed there."