By Richard Adhikari TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
01/29/10 12:03 PM PT
A study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety looked at collision statics in jurisdictions that ban handheld cellphone use, comparing data from before the bands were passed and after. Conclusion: Those bans didn't help reduce the number of accidents. The results surprised even those conducting the study, and they say more research may be needed.
Laws banning drivers from using handheld cellphones while behind the wheel don't help to reduce crashes, a study by the Highway Loss Data Institute has found.
The institute, which is affiliated with the Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety (IIHS), calculated monthly collision claims in New
York, the District of Columbia, Connecticut and California before
and after these states passed such laws.
They compared this data to data from nearby jurisdictions that do not have specific laws banning the use of the devices.
The results indicated that there were no reductions in crashes after
laws requiring drivers to switch to hands-free cellphone usage were
passed.
That was little short of stunning for the IIHS. "We are very surprised
at our findings," institute spokesperson Anne Fleming told
TechNewsWorld. "We were among the people who conducted the first study
that indicated using a cellphone increased the risk of a crash
four-fold."
Details of the Study
The IIHS report based on the study states that the risk of crashing goes up four times
when a driver is talking on a cellphone whether or not a hands-free
device is used. However, while cellphone usage has tripled since
2000, the risk of crashes has declined.
While state bans on handheld phone usage by drivers has cut such
usage by between one-third and one half, the number of collision
claims has not declined, the study found.
The IIHS began looking at
crashes long before and after certain jurisdictions passed laws against
handheld cellphone use.
In New York, for example, the study looked at a period from 22 months before
the state enacted a handheld cellphone ban on drivers to 25 months
after the law was passed, Fleming said. In California, the study began
18 months before the state enacted its handheld cellphone ban on
drivers and continued for 12 months after the law was passed.
Surprise at the study's findings led to more research. "We looked at
federal data files of police reports on crashes," Fleming said. "We
found they're showing the same pattern."
Stranger Than Fiction
The IIHS should be surprised at the results of its survey; a study by
the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, the results of which were released in July of 2009, found that cellphone use
while driving does increase the risk of a crash.
In light vehicle cars, a driver dialing a number on cellphone was 2.8
times more likely to have an accident or near-accident as an
undistracted driver, the study found. Talking or listening to the cellphone increased the risk of an accident by 1.3 times.
For heavy vehicles and trucks, text messaging increased the risk of an
accident by 23.2 times, the study found. Using or reaching for an
electronic device came next, increasing the risk of an accident by 6.7
times. Dialing a number on a cellphone increased the risk by 5.9
times.
What Happened?
Study or no study, banning handheld cellphone usage makes roads safer, according to Lieutenant Lyn Tomioka of the San Francisco Police Department. "Any enforcement for violations of the cellphone use law will show that accidents are reduced," Tomioka told TechNewsWorld. "Obviously, people are distracted when texting, and distractions cause
accidents. Even holding your cellphone in front of you and talking at
a distance instead of holding it to your ear is dangerous and unsafe."
The IIHS is groping for answers to the questions raised by its study.
"We don't really know whether talking on the cellphone is all that
different from other driver distractions, and we know that a huge
proportion of crashes is caused by driver distraction," the
institute's Fleming said. "We don't know if cellphone use is more
distracting than other things."
If cellphones are more of a distraction than other events, that might
explain why, even if drivers use hands-free devices with cellphones
in their cars, the number of accidents has remained unchanged.
Another possibility is that drivers find something else to distract
them when they're using hands-free cellphone devices, Fleming pointed
out. Or perhaps it's simply because few drivers actually follow laws against cellphones and use them just as often as they did before the bans were passed.
The bottom line: Nobody knows for sure what's going on. "Researchers
here and elsewhere are trying to figure out how to scientifically
study the issue," Fleming said.
It's important to find a solution soon -- 37,261 people were killed in
motor vehicle crashes in 2008, the latest year for which the IIHS has
data.
Possible Solutions
Stricter laws may not help because enforcement is very difficult. "We're
skeptical about whether it's feasible to go so far as to ban
hands-free cellphone usage because such laws are difficult to
enforce," the IIHS' Fleming said. It's rather like getting a speeding
ticket -- only an unlucky few will get caught because the police just
don't have enough manpower to stop every speeder.
If laws aren't enough, what can we do? Perhaps we could turn to
technology, Fleming said. "There are technologies being developed here
in the United States that will keep a driver from being able to use a
cellphone while driving," she pointed out.
One technology that might help is DriveSafe.ly, a text-to-speech
conversion software that works on emails and text messages. The application is available from its
developer, ispeech.org, in a free and a paid versions. The paid
version costs US$13.95.
DriveSafe.ly runs on BlackBerry devices and on Android phones. A version
for the iPhone has been submitted for approval
to the iTunes App Store, ispeech.org CEO Heath Ahrens said.
The company developed DriveSafe.ly after one of its staff members was hurt
when his car was rammed at a traffic light by someone who was text
messaging while driving, Ahrens told TechNewsWorld. "The accident
messed up his back, and he had to go for rehab, and even today he's
not the same, so we decided to create an app that would prevent people
from texting while driving," Ahrens said.
Apple Lets VoIP iPhone Apps Use 3G Connections January 29, 2010
The iPhone has long supported applications for making Internet-based phone calls, otherwise known as "VoIP." Until now, though, they were only usable when the phone had a WiFi connection -- in a home or coffee shop, for example. Now, however, Apple has allowed those VoIP apps to make Internet-based calls on AT&T's farther-reaching cellular data network, which could allow users to save calling minutes.
Related Stories
Automobiles, Digital Technology and Safety: It's Complicated December 22, 2009
Driving while distracted -- especially sending or receiving text messages behind the wheel, aka "driving while intexticated" -- is really, really dangerous, research shows. Yet technological advances are providing increasing opportunities for distraction, even if they're not intended for the driver's use while a vehicle is under way and may even contribute to a safer ride.
Road Warning: Swarms of Texting Teens Ahead November 17, 2009
Efforts to persuade teens not to text while driving appear to be largely ineffective, judging from a new report from the Pew Research Center. The practice is as dangerous as driving drunk, studies have shown, but many teens apparently are unwilling to resist the pull of immediate contact.
GPS Safety, Part 1: Texting, Part 2? September 29, 2009
Cellphone texting has taken a lot of heat lately as a dangerous distraction for drivers. What about other in-car technologies like GPS devices? Less research has been devoted to the danger of GPS use while driving. New features in some devices are making them less of a distraction factor, though certain safe practices should always be observed.
Related News Alerts
More by Richard Adhikari
Dev Hacks Emulator to Pick WinPho7's Brain March 19, 2010
Dan Ardelean, a Windows Mobile developer, has unlocked the restricted emulator Microsoft showed to devs at its MIX10 conference recently, allowing him to view bits of the mobile OS Microsoft may not want the public to see yet. Ardelean says his motive was curiosity -- he wanted to see why Windows Mobile phones won't be upgradeable to Windows Phone 7 Series.
Google Hatches Plot to Break Into TV March 18, 2010
Google, Intel, Sony and Logitech have reportedly come together to create a new device platform built for bringing the Web closer to the TV. Google TV would apparently use the Android OS to streamline the act of surfing Web content, including Web-based videos as well as social networking sites, through the television.
Anxieties Besiege FCC's Broadband Game Plan March 17, 2010
The FCC has laid out some big goals for America's online future with its recently introduced national broadband plan, and those big goals may come complete with big price tags. Also causing anxiety among private enterprise is the degree of control the government will have to assume in order to put its plan into motion.