By Richard Adhikari MacNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
11/03/09 4:00 AM PT
Apple does not currently sell netbook computers, but that doesn't mean netbooks can't run Snow Leopard. Many tinkerers have created so-called hackintosh computers using OS X and low-cost netbooks with Intel Atom processors. However, an upcoming OS X update from Apple may nuke Snow Leopard's ability to run on Atom-based computers.
Reading the Avaya-Nortel Roadmap requires a navigator The release of the Avaya-Nortel roadmap has many people wondering what lies ahead for their customer contact initiatives. Join Ovum’s Ian Jacobs and Aspect CTO Gary Barnett to discuss how the integration of two product lines may affect you. Register for the webinar.
An update from Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) for its OS X 10.6 operating system could cause a lot of grief for tinkerers who have installed Snow Leopard on low-cost netbook computers.
The update may cause Snow Leopard to no longer run on Intel's (Nasdaq: INTC) Atom processors. Withdrawing Atom support would prevent device hackers from creating so-called hackintosh netbooks.
Smashing the Atom
Apple has changed around a significant amount of CPU-related information in the latest build for Snow Leopard, according to a blog post by the hacker Stellarolla. One of the effects of this is that Snow Leopard will no run on Intel's Atom chip.
The Atom family of processors consists of low-power chips designed for mobile Internet devices and Internet-centric computers such as netbooks. Over the past year or so, adventurous netbook owners have found that, with a little hacking, the Leopard and Snow Leopard operating systems can be installed on these computers. Many hackintosh charts and how-to guides can be found online.
However, the suspected build is only a developer build, which means the situation might change again.
One reason some users install Mac OS X onto netbooks is price -- netbooks can generally be purchased for less than half the price of a new MacBook. Another reason is size -- Apple does not have a laptop that's as small as a netbook.
The question of whether hackintoshes are technically legal has been often discussed. Specifically, Apple's end user license agreement allows the user to install its OS only on Apple-branded products. Also, Apple is currently involved in a legal battle with Psystar, a company that sells non-Apple computers with OS X pre-installed.
Malice or a Mistake?
The news that the latest build of Snow Leopard won't support the Intel Atom angered some people.
"I like Apple and own an iPhone, but it seems that Apple is trying to win the 'World's Hugest Douche' award," wrote ed21201 in response to a story on the Gizmodo blog about the issue.
"Yet another reason why I won't own an Apple computer," wrote brianesser76, another respondent. "Well this blows, but I have confidence there will be a workaround," Tamako wrote.
However, mechdrew, a moderator on the MyDellMini forum, believes the lack of Intel Atom support is just a mistake. Chances are that the latest build is just faulty, he said. Also, the Intel Atom CPU was not explicitly supported by Snow Leopard; rather, the processor is simply compliant with the minimum requirements of the operating system, he pointed out.
"It's not a released build, so it could be an accident," pointed out Carl Howe, director of anywhere consumer research at the Yankee Group. "Apple could add the capability back in before release."
Alternatively, Apple could further restrict which platforms OS X 10.6.2 will run on, just as it abandoned PowerPC support with the original release of Snow Leopard in August, Howe told MacNewsWorld. "We just don't know yet what features the release will have when it's out," he added.
On the other hand, it could be a subtle signal of Cupertino's future direction. "Apple could be signaling it has no intention of releasing any Atom-based products in the future and that it doesn't particularly want to support unauthorized porting activities like those Psystar was conducting," Howe said.
If Apple doesn't support the Intel Atom for its forthcoming low-power products, it could switch to ARM (Nasdaq: ARMHY), which the iPhone uses. "The iPhone 3.1 OS is a Snow Leopard build," Howe pointed out. "We could see a lot more ARMs in low-power Apple products and a lot less Intel."
Uh, if you owned an *Apple* computer in the first place, you wouldn't have this problem. It's ...
Next Article in OS X
Sidekick Snafu: The Data Saved and the Damage Done October 16, 2009
T-Mobile Sidekick users got taken for a wild and presumably miserable ride this week thanks to a data foul-up that wiped their phones clean. Microsoft, which runs the servers that fumbled the info, later said it had managed to recover most of it, though not before infuriating a whole lot of customers. Meanwhile, AT&T targeted Google, Google targeted Twitter and Twitter targeted spammers.
Related Stories
Data-Chomping Snow Leopard Bug Draws Blizzard of Complaints October 13, 2009
Apple has reportedly acknowledged a flaw in its new Snow Leopard operating system that deletes data when a user first logs in as a guest and then as a regular user. A large volume of complaints have been posted on Apple's online support forums. Attractive pricing, marketing and ease of installation compelled many users to snap up Snow Leopard upon its initial release.
Snow Leopard: It's the Little Things That Thrill September 10, 2009
Mac users familiar with OS X Leopard won't get a heavy dose of new eye candy or new forward-facing features with Snow Leopard. However, the little UI bumps and upgrades here and there are welcome additions, and the behind-the-scenes enhancements really do tweak performance. The $29 cost of an upgrade is a no-brainer.
Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopard: Inside the War Rooms August 31, 2009
Microsoft is an engineering company, and Apple is a marketing company, and that makes all the difference. Microsoft may have a far better product in Windows 7 than Apple has in Snow Leopard, but Apple is making the most of its OS launch because its CEO is also its marketing guru. Microsoft has put together its best marketing team ever, but it's not led by the CEO.
Related News Alerts
More by Richard Adhikari
Apple Tosses In a New iPad With $99 Battery Replacement March 15, 2010
As the rechargeable batteries inside mobile gadgets age, they often lose the ability to hold a charge. Replacing them can be difficult when they're sealed into the device, which is a common design in many Apple products. Apple's latest bid is to offer to replace iPads -- the whole device, not just the power cell -- for $99 when the battery goes bad. The gambit could actually save the company money on shipping and labor.
FCC Testing Tool May Out ISPs' Bogus Speed Claims March 12, 2010
The Federal Communications Commission has introduced new ways consumers can test whether the speed of their broadband connections are anywhere near as fast as their ISPs advertise. The FCC has also introduced new ways people can tell it that broadband isn't available in their homes at all. Meanwhile, ISPs are wary about what they think may be a prelude to uncomfortable new regulations.
Verizon Tips Its 4G Handset Hand March 11, 2010
Verizon's first slate of 4G handsets may come out a little earlier than expected, according to a recent report. Other carriers are working on 4G devices as well, though at different paces. Even when the first devices arrive, however, 4G networks themselves will remain limited; most will likely need to have 3G abilities built in as well. Cost will also be high.