Welcome | Sign In
ECommerceTimes.com
Wireless

T-Mobile's Sprint Ambitions Fraught With Peril

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
T-Mobile's Sprint Ambitions Fraught With Peril

T-Mobile reportedly will attempt to acquire Sprint, a deal that would unite the third- and fourth-largest wireless carriers in the U.S. to create a more competitive No. 3. The move would be a risky one, especially since Sprint has not yet fully integrated its acquisition of Nextel. However, Sprint investors cheered the news.


Success is just a matter of knowing the right "secrets." Download the free eBook, "The Edge of Success: 9 Building Blocks to Double Your Sales." You will discover the fastest, most effective ways to grow your business and still have time to live your life.

The parent company of T-Mobile, the fourth-largest U.S. wireless company, is considering a bid for Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S), the carrier just north of it on the size chart, according to a British newspaper. Citing anonymous sources, The Sunday Telegraph reported Sunday that Deutsche Telekom (NYSE: DT) could make the offer within the next few weeks.

T-Mobile USA referred questions to Deutsche Telekom's media relations office, which did not respond to a request for comment by deadline for this article.

Sprint spokesperson James Fisher said his company had no comment.

Pros and Cons

Such a deal, if it were to happen, would create a large and potentially strong player to nip at the heels of market leaders AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon.

However, it would also present a potentially problematic integration that could cost the combined companies customers and market share, said Chris Collins, a wireless telecom analyst with the Yankee Group.

"There's a lot of reasons to think this is a bad idea," Collins told the E-Commerce Times.

Investors didn't seem to share the sentiment. Sprint shares were up 12 percent by mid-day Monday. Deutsche Telekom was trading slightly down.

Different Cultures

Sprint and T-Mobile run on different technologies. They are geographically disparate, and they also appeal largely to different markets, Collins said. T-Mobile is generally considered a stronger player in the consumer market, with Sprint and its Nextel push-to-talk brand stronger in the enterprise market.

In addition, Sprint is still trying to unwind some of the damage done from its merger with Nextel in 2004.

The deal caused Sprint to write off US$31 billion in related charges and had ramifications for the company's internal structure and customer relations components that caused it to lose its way to a degree, said Jeff Kagan, an independent telecom industry analyst.

Sprint is two years into a rebuilding effort under CEO Dan Hesse, a former AT&T executive.

"The company has gone a long way," Kagan told the E-Commerce Times. "Most customers are actually happy. They are repairing the problems. However, the company keeps losing customers, and that has to be turned around."

Would It Help?

Whether combining the No. 3 and No. 4 wireless companies is the U.S. would accomplish that is another matter.

A merger would be a better strategy Download Free eBook - The Edge of Success: 9 Building Blocks to Double Your Sales than T-Mobile swallowing Sprint whole, but even a merger would be difficult, suggested Kagan.

"Sprint is already two companies -- Sprint and Nextel," he said. "A merger with T-Mobile would turn it into three companies. It may be difficult to integrate all three pieces. Not undoable, but difficult."

Making the Case

Risks aside, it does make some sense for the companies to combine, according to Collins.

"We're in a much more mature industry now," he said. "We're forecasting next to no growth in subscriber base."

A combined company could stand a better chance of grabbing market share from the leaders, said Collins.

The two are the most likely candidates for a combination; there aren't any other major wireless providers the size of T-Mobile or Sprint.

"The market is really shaping up so there are two very dominant players, AT&T and Verizon, competing with one another," Collins said. "There's enough room for a third player, but it's going to be hard for a third and fourth player to compete."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Mike Pearson


More by Mike Pearson

Google Shows Off a Chrome Tablet With 1,000 Faces
February 02, 2010
With the tech world caught in the grip of iPad-mania, Google wants to pull a little focus to its own tablet plans. It has released some concept art depicting what a tablet based on the Chrome operating system might look like and what it might possibly be capable of doing. It could be more attractive than an iPad in some ways. Of course, it could also be a no-show, as nothing official is out of the bag yet.
Could an 'iPad' Make E-Readers Irrelevant?
December 18, 2009
Rumor has it Apple's begun shopping a tablet computer -- or "iPad," as it's been unofficially dubbed -- to publishers. Would Apple's entry into the e-book market spell doom for the Kindle, Nook and Daily Edition? Or is it more likely that an iPad might be a nice device for everything but books?
SSL Certificates: Safety, Nuisance or Both?
December 15, 2009
Online shoppers have become familiar with little logos that indicate a site can be trusted. Obviously, phishers and other scammers can easily place such logos on their own sites without proper authorization. What level of certainty can a consumer have that a site that bears a trusted logo really earned it from a reputable authenticator? What good are these reassurances, really?
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network