Explore Technology Certificate Programs That Fit Your Needs /// Click here to learn more.
Welcome Guest | Sign In

Android: The Good, the Bad and That Pesky Kill Switch

By JR Raphael LinuxInsider ECT News Network
Oct 16, 2008 10:59 AM PT

Google's first Android phone has finally made its way into long-waiting hands. The T-Mobile G1 device, expected to be in stores within the coming week, is drawing mixed reviews from early users. The closest thing to a sweeping overview might be that it is a powerful device with a few flaws but plenty of positives and potential, some of which isn't yet achieved.

Android: The Good, the Bad and That Pesky Kill Switch

One realization getting ample attention is the existence of a so-called "kill switch" -- an option Google retains to remotely disable any Android application on a phone at its own discretion. The discovery of a similar feature in Apple's iPhone drew fierce criticism in August. Whether Google can fend off a comparable backlash is yet to be seen.

Initial Impressions

The G1 is getting praise for its customization options, full QWERTY keypad, and overall ease of use. The lack of a standard headphone jack, video camera, and Exchange synchronization are among the key complaints thus far. The Exchange synchronization, Google has said, will likely become available via a third-party app before long.

When it comes to apps, the Android Market is not surprisingly thus far more limited than its chief competitor, the iPhone App Store -- which has been online for months. That's where the idea of "potential" comes into play. The coming months, one would assume, will see significant growth as developers begin to address the growing demand -- and that may prove to be a key factor in Android's ultimate positioning within the mobile market.

"If you look at the iPhone, obviously the user interface is what really captivated people, coupled with the very strong industrial design," Dan Hays, director of PRTM Management Consultants, told LinuxInsider. "In the case of Android, Google doesn't have control over the industrial design of the devices -- so it really needs to be focused on the quality of the user interface, the innovation that it can execute in that, and driving the ecosystem of applications that will ride on the operating system," he said.

The 'Kill Switch'

So what about this "kill switch," then? The Android Market's terms of service state that if Google discovers "a product that violates the developer distribution agreement," it "retains the right to remotely remove" it from your device "at its sole discretion." The policy alone may not present a problem, Hays believes, if it is executed properly.

"I think it's less an issue of the existence and more an issue of how it might be used," he pointed out. "To me, the question is, 'Is it going to be used to shut down a rogue application that may be doing something on the network that's inappropriate?' If so, that's probably a good thing."

A Google spokesperson was not immediately available to provide a more detailed explanation.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
Should social media sites be held accountable for terrorists' communications?
Yes -- They are providing a platform to facilitate murder and mayhem.
Yes -- Everything must be done to protect society from danger.
Maybe -- I'm not sure they have the technological capability to stop them.
Maybe -- I'm not convinced terrorists are using them for serious plotting.
No -- Authorities should monitor social networks to gather intelligence.
No -- Social networks are no different than phone carriers or mail services.