By Erika Morphy E-Commerce Times
10/26/07 3:30 PM PT
Vonage appears to be springing back to life with yet another settlement of patent litigation brought against it. The latest deal, in a case it lost to Verizon, caps its penalty at a possible $120 million. The VoIP pioneer has at least one more legal thicket ahead: a patent infringement case brought by AT&T.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
Vonage has settled the financial details of a lawsuit it lost to Verizon for patent infringement, capping its penalty at US$120 million -- a possible $32 million in addition to the $88 million already accrued and held in escrow.
The final amount will depend on how the Court of Appeals decides Vonage's pending petition for a rehearing on two of the Verizon patents. If Vonage wins a rehearing on either, or if the injunction on either is vacated, it will pay Verizon $80 million.
If Vonage does not win a rehearing, or if the court lifts the stay and reinstates the injunction, Vonage will have to pay the full $120 million, including $2.5 million to certain charities.
Moving Forward
Reaching this settlement, on top of an earlier $80 million settlement with Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S), means Vonage can now concentrate on moving forward with its business plan, company spokesperson Charlie Sahner told the E-Commerce Times.
The company can now give its full attention to what it hopes will be the last major legal obstacle to overcome: a patent infringement suit brought by AT&T (NYSE: T).
Filed last Wednesday in the U.S. District Court in Madison, Wis., the AT&T suit centers on a 1996 patent that describes the process of routing phone calls over the Internet.
"We continue to work towards an amicable solution with AT&T," Sahner said.
Threatening Product
The fact that Vonage has been bombarded with patent infringement lawsuits does not necessarily mean it deliberately violated other companies' patent rights. One must also consider the disruptive effect in the telecom industry accompanying the emergence of VoIP, or Voice over Internet Protocol.
"The fact that Vonage is plagued by lawsuits appears to be a testimony to its value," attorney Steven Rubin of WolfBlock's Intellectual Property/Information Technology Practice Group told the E-Commerce Times.
"You don't bother suing a company that doesn't have a market share or a threatening product," he said.
Both sides, though, have much to gain -- and lose -- if litigation is protracted.
"AT&T's patent ... will be subject to the more stringent patentability standard articulated by the Supreme Court, Rubin said. "This means it will be easier for Vonage to challenge its validity."
On the other hand, Vonage may be handicapped by its earlier settlements with AT&T competitors. One effect of all these lawsuits is that there are ample court records explaining Vonage's technology.
"This makes it easier for a company like AT&T to learn of potential infringement and to make a case," Rubin pointed out.
"Vonage is also backed into a corner by certain admissions," he continued. "By trying to avoid infringement in one case, it may have admitted infringement in another."
Congress Scrambles to Extend Net Tax Ban as Deadline Looms October 26, 2007
The United States Senate has agreed upon a bill that would extend the ban on taxes on Internet services. So has the House of Representatives. However, they have not agreed on the same bill -- one extends the ban for seven years, the other for four. The current ban expires Nov. 1, and President Bush appears eager to sign an extension into law. Congress has until Thursday to hammer out their differences.
Related Stories
AT&T Puts Vonage Back on Litigation Merry-Go-Round October 22, 2007
Vonage seems to be stuck in a vicious cycle of litigation. Earlier this year, the VoIP company settled patent disputes with Sprint Nextel and Klausner Technologies and was ordered to pay Verizon $58 million in damages for violating three of Verizon's patents. Now, AT&T is suing Vonage for patent infringement.
Down, Not Out: Vonage Rebounds on Settlement With Sprint October 08, 2007
Vonage shares soared about 75 percent in late morning trading Monday after the company and Sprint disclosed that they settled a patent infringement suit. Under the agreement, Vonage -- which will pay $80 million to Sprint -- has the right to use Sprint's technology, including its entire Voice over Packet portfolio.
Jury's Patent Verdict Leaves Vonage in Critical Condition September 26, 2007
A jury ruled that VoIP firm Vonage infringed on patents held by Sprint Nextel and awarded the telecom giant $69.5 million in damages. Vonage will seek to overturn the verdict, it announced, by asking the U.S. District Court to set aside the decision and then, if necessary, by appealing to a higher court.
Related News Alerts
More by Erika Morphy
Roku Channel Store Hangs Out Shingle November 23, 2009
Roku's new channel store is based on a "one screen in the cloud" business model, said Michael Gartenberg, vice president of strategy and analysis with Interpret. "Essentially, what they are doing is taking the TV set -- whether it is a standard appliance or a high-def monster -- and enhancing it with content the consumer wants to see."
Ballmer Gives Shareholders - and Dell - Cause for Optimism November 20, 2009
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer was all smiles at the company's shareholders meeting, as he touted the early success of Windows 7. Ballmer's cheer may have been contagious; after posting a massive earnings decline for the third quarter, Dell needed some good news to latch onto, and the prospect of broad enterprise adoption of Windows 7 could spur PC sales.
AA.com Sucks the Fun Out of Trip-Planning November 20, 2009
Using AA.com to book a flight was a painful experience. Densely packed, disorganized information was displayed in an unattractive format. On the plus side, it did seem as though the deals American Airlines advertised were real and not mere bait-and-switch lures. For anyone who wants a travel-planning Web site to inject a little pleasure into the experience, though, I say look elsewhere.