By Chris Maxcer E-Commerce Times
10/19/07 1:24 PM PT
Following a Massachusetts Superior Court ruling, the New England Patriots are now in possession of customer data from 13,000 users of ticket reseller site StubHub. The NFL team forbids ticket holders to resell their passes. The Patriots, however, asked for details surrounding not only sellers and buyers, but those who made bids as well.
The New England Patriots NFL football team now has customer information from ticket reselling service StubHub. The team reportedly gained access to 13,000 records of people who purchased, sold or bid on Patriots tickets on the site after taking StubHub to court.
Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Allan van Gestel ruled that StubHub had to turn the information over to the Patriots. The decision was the result of a court case lobbed by the Patriots in an effort to crack down on season ticket holders who resell their tickets to other people. The Patriots have a policy against reselling tickets, and the team alleged that StubHub was encouraging its fans to violate the team's policies.
Massachusetts' Laws, Patriots' Rules
Massachusetts has a law against scalping tickets -- ticket holders can only resell their tickets at a nominal US$2 over the face value of the ticket. Patriots season ticket holders would have been technically in violation of Massachusetts state law if they sold tickets via StubHub -- or even a street corner -- for anything more than $2 above face value. Massachusetts, however, isn't bringing legal action against StubHub or the company's customers. The court case was about StubHub letting its customers use its service to violate the Patriot's rules with its ticket-holding customers.
Current ticket prices on StubHub for the Patriots game against the Miami Dolphins on Sunday range from $94 to $1,278 each. Teams and sports fans often argue that reselling tickets allows individuals to hoard passes and jack up prices, and that any team attempting to curtail reselling is merely trying to keep prices affordable. The Patriots, however, asked for details surrounding not only sellers and buyers, but those who made bids as well. Their request seems a bit overzealous to the Center for Democracy and Technology.
"If they only asked for the names of sellers where the price was over the $2 ticket value, we would not have a concern," Ari Schwartz, the Center's deputy director, told the E-Commerce Times.
Plus, van Gestel granted the Patriots the ability to use the data with little oversight, other than not to make the details public.
Antiquated Laws?
StubHub would not comment directly on the case; however, it did address Massachusetts' law on reselling tickets.
"Massachusetts is actually very close to removing that regulation and changing their law like every other state has in the U.S., because there's only essentially six states that have a similar restriction as Massachusetts," Sean Pate, public relations director for StubHub, told the E-Commerce Times. "Those laws were created in the 1920s so they are dramatically outdated."
Even though the Massachusetts law isn't of concern in this case -- it's about the Patriots' rules for ticket holders -- anti-scalping laws have been biting the dust over the last few years. StubHub, which is owned by eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), has been reaping the benefits.
"There is only a handful of states that govern and restrict ticket resale. It's legal to resell in every state," Pate said, noting that only a few even have laws that restrict the amount a ticket could be resold for.
Either way, regardless of anti-scalping laws, the customer data collected by StubHub as part of its business is now in the hands of the Patriots, who are widely expected to revoke tickets from their StubHub-selling season ticket holders.
The big question, then, is whether this kind of court case presents a problem for online consumers.
"It is becoming a more common problem. There has been some discussion of this issue in music downloading, although it may be harder to draw a clear line on what is legal and what is illegal in those cases," Schwartz notes. "The Patriots' case seems pretty clear to me -- did the seller make more than $2 over face value? I can't recall a similar case that afforded this much latitude."
The Patriots were unavailable for comment at press time.
ATG Commerce Service Center Debuts July 02, 2007
The current iteration of ATG Commerce is influenced by several acquisitions the company has made in recent years, Kelly O'Neill, product marketing director, told CRM Buyer. These include Primus, whose functionality is incorporated into the platform, and eStara, which can be integrated into it as an add-on.
Sterling Commerce's Joel Reed: B2B2C Equals B2E January 26, 2007
With the acquisition of Comergent, Sterling Commerce will be able to provide customers with a unified, end-to-end order management solution across the extended supply chain, said Joel Reed, vice president of global marketing at Sterling Commerce. This will allow them to increase revenue, shorten sales and order fulfillment cycle times and reduce overall supply chain costs, he added.
Sterling Commerce to Acquire E-Commerce Firm Comergent November 27, 2006
Both Sterling Commerce and Comergent have built complementary SOA-based systems, which should ease their system and staff integration efforts. However, "the challenge will be which application foundation pieces -- like order-brokering engines, configurators and catalogs -- remain, and what that convergence strategy will look like," said Forrester Research Principal Analyst Ray Wang.
Related News Alerts
More by Chris Maxcer
The iPad's Cruel Teaser March 09, 2010
The iPad ad that debuted on Sunday was remarkable in how many functions it managed to cram into just 30 seconds. Document creation, email, e-books, media viewing -- all that and more was demoed using just two hands and a hip soundtrack. However, the ad left quite a few important questions about the iPad unanswered.
The iPad Catalyst Will Light a Lot of Fires March 02, 2010
I think we're going to get a lot of fantastic content options for mobile devices in 2010, even if you don't pony up for an iPad. While the iPad will likely be a raging success, it'll also help generate a market for alternatives. The question is, can we credit -- or blame -- the iPad for generating all this mobile action? Maybe not the iPad alone, but it's certainly the latest catalyst.
With Smut Ban, App Store Exposes a Jiggly Set of Rules February 23, 2010
Apple's stance on risque iPhone and iPod touch apps is understandable, but the whole incident does underscore the App Store's frustratingly fickle nature. Apple should either draw up a precise, crystal-clear set of guidelines for app developers or just admit it's completely subjective -- "If we like it, it's in; if we don't, it's rejected." Right now, its policy seems to be somewhere in between.