By Kimberly Hill TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
06/19/07 12:05 PM PT
Google is seeking to share its viewpoint with policy makers and others on a corporate-sponsored blog focused on controversial issues and public policy. Company officials want it to be a two-way conversation. In comparison, many of Google's existing blogs are limited to dispensing product news and do not invite outsider comments.
eMarketer Whitepaper: Optimizing the E-Commerce Experience
From the Web to the Contact Center, are you prepared to proactively engage and keep your savvy customers? Read how e-commerce leaders are optimizing their sites with ratings, reviews, live help, Web analytics, mobile and more.
Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) wants to go beyond discussing its latest tools and products with blog readers -- the search engine giant is eager to share its corporate viewpoint with public policy makers.
The company launched a new blog this week to provide information and thought processes from inside Google headquarters to policy makers around the world, said Andrew McLaughlin, Google's director of public policy and government affairs. The blog aims to discuss policies that "foster free expression, promote economic growth, expand access to information, enable innovation and protect consumers," he said.
A Two-Way Street
Google's many existing blogs have typically leaned on technical topics: the Checkout tool, the Mashup Editor and analytics. They also have served as avenues through which Google informs the public about corporate affairs.
The public policy blog differentiates itself by inviting outsider comments -- a feature many of the other Google blogs do not. This is to foster that oft-invoked communication companies say they want with their customers, according to McLaughlin. However, the customers this particular blog seeks to serve do not comprise all Google users. Rather, the blog is aimed at those who make public policy, including "legislators, ministers, governors, city councilmembers, regulators and the staffers who support them," McLaughlin noted.
Dialogue Begins
Already, a number of those involved in corporate public policy issues have come forward to welcome the blog. Among them are a Verizon staffer working on that company's policy blog, an Iowa healthcare advocacy worker and the policy coordinator for Canadian policy group CLUE.
A number of controversial issues also have been raised in the two dozen comments posted so far. They include Google's practice of storing historical information on users' searches, the company's cooperation with the Chinese government in filtering Internet information available to searches initiated by people in that country, and the implications of Google's acquisition of DoubleClick (Nasdaq: DCLK).
That's what the company is looking for, Google spokesperson Adam Kovacevich told TechNewsWorld. "We absolutely expect people to be blunt and honest and take issue with what we're doing," he said.
Will a deluge come with the opening of the floodgates? Perhaps so, he conceded. Google's long-term goal is to open more of the company's blogs to two-way interaction with users. The limitation, he noted, has been staffing and the "person power" necessary to monitor comments and follow conversations in so many different forums.
Microsoft's Fake Patent Scare, Engadget's Apple Fiasco, Google's Brand Rules, Product of the Week May 21, 2007
In the Microsoft vs. open source contest, the side that wins won't be the one with hundreds of patents, nor will it be the one generating the nastiest e-mail with the scariest personal threats. The side that wins will be the one that best addresses the customers' needs, and the side that doesn't get this will not only be a failure, but also historically famous for it.
Related Stories
What's Behind Google's Sneak Attack Against Microsoft? June 12, 2007
What's at the bottom of Google's reported accusations that Microsoft is in violation of antitrust laws? The critical question appears to be whether it is, in fact, difficult to replace Vista's search engine default with another company's product. The answer may depend on which company has the better expert to make its case -- and how the DoJ and state attorneys general line up on the controversy.
Privacy Advocates Cry Foul Over Google, DoubleClick Deal April 20, 2007
With Google poised to buy online ad service provider DoubleClick, proponents of Web privacy are concerned that such a merger will put too much user information in one company's hands. Three privacy advocate groups have filed a complaint with the FTC asking the commission to demand that Google make formal guarantees it will not retain certain user info.
Google Paves Way for Wikipedia Breakthrough February 22, 2007
In January, Wikipedia first appeared on comScore's top 10 hottest properties on the Web with 42.9 million unique visitors. That is thanks in large part to Google -- Wikipedia's page designs are optimized to be picked up by the search giant, which often lists a Wikipedia entry among the top five results for a term search.
Related News Alerts
More by Kimberly Hill
Apple's Remote: An App Near to My TV-Hungry Heart February 05, 2009
If you think free iPhone apps are worth the price, think again -- especially if Apple is the developer. Remote is one freebie that you're going to want to use every time you turn on your TV. And keep using for hours, even if you don't make a single phone call or surf to a single Web site. There's a method to Apple's generosity: It hopes you'll never put your iPhone down.
Boxee Gives New Meaning to Plug and Play February 04, 2009
If you're longing for media convergence but not yet sure you want to spend big bucks to make it happen in a still-shifting television landscape, Boxee might be just the app for you. MacNewsWorld reviewer Kimberly Hill, who's been testing the alpha release with her Mac, considers it a great way to wait until the dust settles.
The Plight of Advertisers in a Multichannel World January 09, 2009
Consumers increasingly expect device independence in accessing content, indicates a new survey from Deloitte. The trend is most pronounced among younger people, but Baby Boomers and older adults -- those likely to be bigger spenders -- are also mixing it up. What's an advertiser to do?