By Dana Gardner LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
05/20/07 4:00 AM PT
We're now seeing Microsoft's true stripes. The performance of the products is a charade, an unfortunate cost of doing business in a once competitive market. The real means to profits and market share are really about legal positioning, but in essence necessitates a military posture. For what are laws and lawyers but a means to avoid violence and warfare in lieu of a day in court?
Is Your Website Killing Customer Confidence? Your Website's privacy policy can be a key factor in a customer's decision to do business with you, and it is vital to ensuring you don't run afoul of your online legal and regulatory responsibilities. Need more reasons? Read on.
SCO failed, so now Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) has to do the heavy lifting itself to undermine open source software's legitimacy. Actually, Microsoft prefers to undermine Red Hat's (NYSE: RHT) legitimacy. Or Open-Xchange's. Or your company's.
The latest moves by Microsoft, however, give them away. Stripped of their proxies, their moves are now more clearly understood to be essentially military. You are the civilians caught between Microsoft's lawyers and their quarry.
The details are now trickling out that Microsoft has real numbers -- some 235 patents across dozens of open source products -- that define the purported assault on its intellectual property. Like SCO, they can't tell you how you offend. You just need to know that you offend. You should also now know that the remedy to such transgressions shall be levied by Microsoft's legal minions, and through the laws of your great republic, when and if Microsoft feels like it.
A Medieval Approach
Man, there is something medieval about this. Or perhaps imperial ... as in the true-but-damning line from the movie "Gladiator," "They should know when they are conquered," spoken by a Roman militarist before a successful rout of Germania's finest.
Through its deal with Novell (Nasdaq: NOVL), Microsoft can claim to support open source, err ... Linux, in theory. However, in reality Redmond's legal eagles want you to know that if you use any other -- though you can't know which -- open source code, you do so at Microsoft's pleasure.
"My dear enterprise, do please know that you are allowed to use computers and IT at the discretion of a convicted antitrust violator, and only at the discretion of Microsoft's whim of when and how to charge you for the pleasure of running your business," they seem to be saying.
Microsoft doesn't seem to have the stomach for a long legal tussle with the actual vendors and distributors it knows has tread upon it. Rather, it prefers to cut off the oxygen of those violators by quietly threatening the end users. Microsoft expects you, dear enterprises, to flee from those non-Microsoft sanctioned barbarians. However, to protect your Linux investment, almighty Microsoft has a tribute to you -- a safe haven in the capable hands of Novell.
Microsoft's True Stripes
If there was ever a case for open source software, dear readers, this is it.
This is clearly an act of desperation, yet an act from a perceived position of immutable power. Having worked with animals, I can tell you these can be truly dangerous circumstances.
We're now seeing Microsoft's true stripes. The performance of the products is a charade, an unfortunate cost of doing business in a once competitive market. The real means to profits and market share are really about legal positioning, but in essence necessitates a military posture. For what are laws and lawyers but a means to avoid violence and warfare in lieu of a day in court? Or even the threat of legal action may suffice.
So, Microsoft wants to make war on its competitors, using you (dear enterprise) as its proxies, but via not violence per se but rather the threat of legal action against you (dear enterprise) while charging you (dear enterprise) to switch to Microsoft's minions.
Hold the Line
If there was ever a case for open source software, dear readers, this is it.
Microsoft, of course, does not really want to take you, dear enterprise, to court. They would prefer to threaten, posture, evoke concern. Most sensible armies prefer to threaten war, and then make off with the loot sans losing their bullets or blood.
So the gauntlet has been loosed by the warlords of Redmond, those with the velvet glove over the patents cudgel.
I say, hold the line. Boycott the aggressors. Embargo their natural resources. Cut off the supply chains. Disrupt the lines of communication.
If Microsoft wants a shadow war with its customers, what they will more likely get is a re-energized civilian insurgency. We know all too well how effective and difficult to prosecute those can be.
Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, which tracks trends, delivers forecasts and interprets the competitive landscape of enterprise applications and software infrastructure markets for clients. He also produces
BriefingsDirect sponsored podcasts.
Gartner: Software Users Must Fight for Open Source May 18, 2007
"Vendors increasingly want to tweak the meaning of open source to include, for example, attribution licensing, which says the user can modify and redistribute the software, and make derivative versions based on it only if they give the author credit," said Gartner analyst Brian Prentice.
Related Stories
Microsoft Patent Claims: Rattling Sabers or Ready to Rumble? May 15, 2007
With Microsoft's recent assertions that various forms of open source software violate at least 235 of its patents, are Linux developers, distributors and users safe? Any legal action taken by Microsoft will likely be subdued. The company will probably stop short of going after the supposed infringements with a full-on legal assault, which would cause a meltdown in the software industry.
The Serious Synergy Between SOA and Open Source May 15, 2007
The proposed SOA Runtime Framework Project could show how user organizations such as DPWN can swiftly catapult mission-critical infrastructure for service-oriented architecture into an open source community, with the potential for significant disruption in the world SOA marketplace.
Related News Alerts
More by Dana Gardner
Nothing New Under the Business Commerce Cloud? November 22, 2009
Business commerce clouds are all about leveraging cloud architecture to go to the next level: a dynamic business-services environment that wells up around the needs of a business group or niche, and then subsides when lack of demand dictates. Is this the wave of the future, or are we really just pouring old "business webs" wine into new bottles?
Text Analysis and the Next Generation of BI November 15, 2009
External data has grown in both volume and importance across the Internet. Companies are figuring out ways to make the most of Web data services for business intelligence. Real-time text analytics fills out a framework of Web data services that can form a whole greater than the sum of the parts. However, any BI or any text analysis is no better than the data source behind it.
Pumping Up Performance in Densely Packed Data Centers November 08, 2009
Thanks to architectural advancements and better efficiencies, densely stuffed data centers can carry ever-greater loads, and that can certainly work to consolidate and ultimately reduce costs. However, having fewer data centers means all the information they handle will likely have to travel longer distances between server and user. Network services and Internet performance management may be the solution.