By Clare Saliba E-Commerce Times
12/06/00 4:40 PM PT
New York City-based Kozmo delivers
food and videos in 11 U.S. cities.
The civil rights group that filed a discrimination lawsuit against online
delivery service Kozmo.com earlier
this year announced Tuesday that it will not pursue the suit as part of a
agreement brokered by the parties to increase Internet access in
underserved communities in Washington, D.C.
The Equal Rights Center said the initiative and the
company's expansion of its service areas
were key factors in the decision to drop the case they
initially filed in April.
"Based on our discussions with Kozmo executives and our review of the
evidence, we concluded that the definition of Kozmo's initial service area
was not motivated by racial discrimination," said Equal Rights Center
executive director David Berenbaum.
Bias Claims
The lawsuit alleged that the New York City-based Kozmo, which delivers
food and videos in 11 U.S. cities, was intentionally
refusing to serve predominantly minority neighborhoods
in the D.C. area. The suit came two days after an MSNBC
report stating that although the Washington, D.C.
population is 66 percent African-American, the neighborhoods
served by Kozmo are 65 percent white and 25 percent
African-American, while the areas denied service are
86 percent African-American.
Kozmo, which had steadfastly denied the accusations, agreed with Berenbaum's
assessment. Kozmo communications director Stephanie Cohen Glass told the
E-Commerce Times that its service areas "are based on a number of factors,
not discrimination."
In Tuesday's announcement, Glass said that the
Equal Rights Center "came to
the same conclusion that we've maintained all along."
Divide Closers
In a joint statement, the parties said that their goal is to "work toward assuring
full and equal access to the digital marketplace," with Kozmo contributing
US$125,000 to the initiative. The Equal Rights Center will handle
details of the effort, which is now in the preliminary planning stages.
"Kozmo is committed to helping underserved communities access the Internet
and we're looking forward to working with the Equal Rights Center to bridge
the digital divide in Washington, D.C.," said Kozmo chief executive officer Gerry Burdo.
Berenbaum also noted that widespread Net access would help ensure that
entire communities do not fall behind the technological curve.
"As in many cities in the country, the Internet is not living up to its
promise as the great equalizer because many of the residents of historically
underserved communities are unable to get access to the Internet," he said.
Case Dismissed
Tuesday's announcement was a marked turnaround for
both Kozmo and the Equal Rights Center.
Shortly after filing suit, the group hailed the case as a
watershed legal action, saying it was
the first civil rights case brought against an Internet company. The
group also said the case
highlighted the untapped purchasing power of minority communities.
However, in September, the court dismissed the case
with the plaintiffs' consent,
after denying their request to
extend scheduling deadlines. At the time, the activists announced
plans to re-file the case in Washington D.C. Superior Court.
For its part, Kozmo maintained that its delivery areas were not drawn to
exclude minorities, but rather that it decided to serve neighborhoods in which
there was a high Internet penetration and usage rate. The company also
said that the court's dismissal of the civil rights case
indicated that there was no evidence of racial bias. According to Kozmo,
the activists were not able to prove their claims within the time allowed.
Even so, Glass said the company
continued to speak with the Equal Rights Center after the
case's dismissal about "erasing the digital divide not only in Washington,
D.C. but elsewhere."
The new agreement between the two parties brings an end to the legal
challenges.
Jupiter, NetRatings Renew Patent Lawsuit January 21, 2002
Though still pursuing their merger, Internet measurement firms Jupiter Media Metrix
and NetRatings now intend to re-open their patent litigation.