By Sonia Arrison TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
12/16/05 5:00 AM PT
It's truly shocking that anyone, especially a police officer, could think that something posted on a Web site will remain private. But his mistake goes to show that it's taking a while for some to realize that the Internet is in full public view and that digital information travels quickly.
Is Your Website Killing Customer Confidence? Your Website's privacy policy can be a key factor in a customer's decision to do business with you, and it is vital to ensuring you don't run afoul of your online legal and regulatory responsibilities. Need more reasons? Read on.
Those who claim that racism, sexism, and homophobia run rampant in the San Francisco Police Department got some high-powered ammunition last week. Videos posted on the Web showed police officers participating in outrageous acts -- an embarrassment for the city and a strong demonstration of how technology is reshaping society.
Although the videos have been taken down from their original site, they still exist elsewhere on the Web. In a lame attempt to be funny, the footage shows officers ogling a woman stopped for a traffic violation, an African American officer eating out of a dog bowl, and an officer dressed as a transgendered person wiggling his tongue towards a police captain.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom held a press conference to denounce the digital dirt. "It is shameful. It is offensive. It is sexist. It is homophobic, it is racist, and we're going to make sure it ends," he said.
Digital Info Travels Fast
It's nice to see the mayor taking a break from his wasteful quest to foist a government-run Internet on every man, woman and child in San Francisco. Real concerns, such as a disrespectful and unprofessional culture among city police, call for fixing and fortunately have been exposed by the largely unregulated Internet. In fact, the creator himself posted the damning data.
Officer Andrew Cohen, producer of the videos, posted some scenes on the Web in order to "boost morale of law enforcement." If that doesn't make one wonder if he's confused, consider that he told the San Francisco Chronicle that the videos were "never intended to be shown outside the ranks."
It's truly shocking that anyone, especially a police officer, could think that something posted on a Web site will remain private. But his mistake goes to show that it's taking a while for some to realize that the Internet is in full public view and that digital information travels quickly. The disturbing images of torture at Abu Ghraib prison taken by U.S. military prison guards with digital cameras comes to mind. But not everyone likes this free flow of information.
Increasing Tolerance
Writing for Wired.com, Jennifer Granick of Stanford University's law school complains about loss of privacy and the growing pervasiveness of face recognition software. She says, "A new face may be the only way to preserve some semblance of privacy." Her comment is true if society continues to look at privacy the same way it always has, but that is unreasonable and unlikely. Instead, over time individuals will learn that even if they live in a big city, their actions might be judged as though they live in a small town.
Increased public scrutiny of individual actions could have the effect of making people more tolerant of mistakes because it could be them under the microscope next. And it will certainly make people more careful about how they behave. In the case of the San Francisco police department, this type of oversight is badly needed. When it comes to face recognition software, its growing pervasiveness is a positive development.
Companies such as Riya are providing it for average individuals to use to search photo databases. What that means is that the government no longer has a monopoly on the tech. For now at least, America appears to be moving towards a "transparent society" rather than one in which only Big Brother owns the tools to control. It wasn't always clear that would happen.
Freedom for All
Back in 2002, when law-enforcement officials used face recognition technology to scan the faces of fans attending Super Bowl XXXV in Tampa, it was worrisome not only because government was watching, but also because citizens didn't have a good method to watch back. Things have changed, and accelerating technological advances continue to enhance freedom overall.
The San Francisco police video scandal shows that technology can catch wrongdoing even by those who think they are above scrutiny. It may be that the more old-fashioned privacy is lost, the better off everyone will be. Welcome to the digital village.
Mobile Phone Viruses: What Have We Learned? December 14, 2005
You are still much more likely to get hit with a PC virus or worm than with a smartphone virus -- today. But let's take a look at history. It took 20 years to get to today's situation, with more than 140,000 PC viruses. But it has only taken 18 months to go from zero to 100 mobile phone viruses. At that rate, smartphone viruses could catch up to PC viruses within five years.
Related Stories
Tech's New Advocate in the California Capitol December 09, 2005
Economists have a name for what Commissioner Susan Kennedy so adeptly described: government failure. And it's clear that government failure is something that really irks her. Her policy positions at the Public Utilities Commission are as free-market as one could hope for in California, and there's no sign she's giving up on reform.
Rooting Out Spyware: Sony's Lesson December 02, 2005
When it comes to poor actors in the marketplace, the Sony story shows that a free and open society will respond quickly and effectively. Sony has already issued a recall for all the offending CDs, and a private company has come up with a self-regulation plan for industry.
Beware the Legacy Cable Guy November 18, 2005
California legislators should see cable franchise reform as a fairness issue. The telcos had no one protecting them from the sudden onslaught of competition in voice from the cable industry, so it's really not fair that the cable guys get a better deal.
World Summit Drama Threatens Internet's Future November 11, 2005
It's clear why authoritarian governments don't like the Internet and why they seek to control it -- open dialogue poses a threat to their power. But that doesn't explain European reasons for wanting to place the information highway into the precarious hands of the UN.
Forward Future Requires Past Principles November 04, 2005
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are core human rights that should be the foundation of all policy. Every individual should have the ability to avoid death and pursue survival. Regulations that ban life-saving procedures or tests, such as a ban against at-home AIDS tests, violate this right.
More by Sonia Arrison
How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley? August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.
Headline Feeds
Talkback: 
