By Elizabeth Millard LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
07/28/04 11:56 AM PT
Other research companies, such as Denmark-based Acunia, have released surveys that report very different results found by those at Evans. Some of these reports note that Windows and Linux are equally secure. Petreley called these findings "erroneous." Petreley noted that the problem with many of these other surveys is the lack of questions about what made the Linux systems insecure, and how a vulnerability was exploited.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
Evans Data today released survey results showing that 90 percent of Linux systems have never been infected by a virus, and nearly 80 percent have never been hacked.
The survey of 500 Linux developers worldwide was conducted earlier this month. The respondents' answers were compared to another survey done by Evans in the spring, the North American Development Survey. In that comparison, 3 in 5 non-Linux developers reported a security breach and 32 percent experienced three or more breaches.
Evans' Linux analyst Nicholas Petreley told LinuxInsider that the results showed the most common mechanism by which a Linux machine can be compromised is by users inadequately configuring security settings. Other compromises came from vulnerability in Internet service and Web server flaws.
"Ironically, the other flaws that crackers use to compromise Linux servers are flaws in applications which run on competing operating systems, so those vulnerabilities are not specific to Linux," Petreley said.
Additional Findings
The recent survey produced a number of other findings related to Linux. It
noted that less than 7 percent of survey respondents said that their systems were hacked three or more times.
Of the 22 percent that had been hacked at least once, 23 percent of the intrusions
were by internal users with valid login IDs.
Besides that security issue, Evans also asked general Linux development
issues in the survey and found that developer migration to the 2.6 kernel has increased significantly in six months. It has grown by more than 80 percent, with only 12 percent of respondents expecting to take longer than a year to make the move.
In terms of the contentious legal battles being waged by The SCO Group,
most developers did not think the outcome would affect their decisions.
Seventy-six percent noted that the lawsuits will probably not, or absolutely not, affect their company's adoption of Linux. This number is 6 percent greater than when the survey was last done, six months ago.
Security Measures
Although Evans asked a variety of questions, it is the security angle
that the market-intelligence firm is highlighting most.
Petreley noted that the results are not surprising that Linux systems
are not hacked to the same degree as Windows-based machines.
"The reasons for the greater inherent security of the Linux OS are
simple," he stated. "[M]ore eyes on the code means that less slips by,
and the OS is naturally going to be better secured."
Yankee Group analyst Laura DiDio noted that security is one major reason
why many companies have been considering adoption of Linux. However, it
is not always the OS's reputation for not being hacked that inspires the
move.
"People are just tired of doing all those endless Windows security
patches," she told LinuxInsider. "If you've got a Windows-based
architecture, you pretty much have to have someone dedicated to doing
security fulltime, depending on the size of the company."
Another important finding, Petreley said, was the number of Linux developers that have never been infected by a virus. The 90 percent figure has been fairly consistent over the last three years. "That alone is amazing," Petreley said.
Fun with Statistics
Other research companies, such as Denmark-based Acunia, have released surveys that report very different results found by those at Evans. Some of these reports note that Windows and Linux are equally secure. Petreley called these findings "erroneous."
Petreley noted that the problem with many of these other surveys is the lack of questions about what made the Linux systems insecure, and how a vulnerability was exploited.
"Acunia has graphs which are incredibly misleading," he said. "They show
a certain number of security problems, but they don't cross-tabulate to
tell you what level of access was needed to gain control of a system."
By cross-tabulating, the reports might have shown that internal access
was necessary, as opposed to access from outside the building. Petreley
is hopeful that more in-depth research will help to clarify the security power of Linux.
He said, "There's just been inadequate research up to this point. People
haven't looked at all of the factors that go into security."
Mozilla Usage Flat in July Following June Surge July 27, 2004
"Traditionally, Mozilla/Netscape has had higher weekend numbers -- about a third of point increase," Geoff Johnston, an analyst with WebSideStory, a San Diego-based Web metrics company, said. "Now, though, it's about three-quarters of a point. It looks like its weekend usage -- which usually means users haven't got the OK to use it at work yet so they're using it at home -- is happening at a faster pace now," he reasoned.
Related Stories
Red Hat Moves On, Ends Support Today for Linux 9 April 30, 2004
"A strong network of partnerships with the world's leading applications vendors is vital to the adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux," said Mike Evans, vice president of partner development at Red Hat.
What If Microsoft Got Security Right? March 01, 2004
I'm not even going to suggest that Linux is less secure, but if the exposure is people and people are gullible, then security at a product level might only make you feel more secure. You might not actually be more secure. So, as far as I can tell, Microsoft is the only large firm really dealing with behavioral issues.
Linux Security Holes Opened and Closed February 20, 2004
While there is an ongoing debate as to the most secure operating system, open-source advocates tout this week's fast-fix response as an example of the security advantages of Linux and other open-source software, which is freely available to users and developers.
Ken Xie of Fortinet on Fighting Content Threats November 25, 2004
"Integrating independent security systems together and keeping them all up-to-date and able to coordinate their actions in the face of a fast-moving attack is a daunting if not intractable task," Fortinet CEO Ken Xie told ECT News. "To deal with today's and tomorrow's blended threats requires a more integrated, holistic approach to security."
Microsoft Files More Lawsuits over Spam September 24, 2004
Going after spammers rather than focusing merely on developing antispam technology is an important step, John Movina, spokesperson for the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email, said. He told The E-Commerce Times that the United States has weaker criminal laws against spam than other countries, so it's vital to find other means to stop spammers.
French Firms Aim To Beef Up Linux Security September 24, 2004
The consortium plans to make bringing Linux up to the Evaluation Assurance Level 5 (EAL5), which is part of an internationally recognized security certification called Common Criteria, its first effort. EAL5 satisfies major security requirements in commercial as well as defense and government applications.