By Staff Writer E-Commerce Times
10/17/03 4:03 AM PT
"Who would trust [SCO] after the IBM suit?" IDC vice president Dan Kusnetzky said. "And they have threatened end-user customers with litigation. In effect, they have destroyed themselves as either a Unix or Linux supplier."
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
To say the SCO Group has been making headlines frequently is an understatement. Since March, when the company filed suit against IBM (NYSE: IBM) for allegedly using SCO-owned Unix code in its Linux systems, SCO has gotten an unheard-of amount of press for a company that, according to its third-quarter results, posted only US$20.1 million in revenue.
In the last 52 weeks, SCO stock has gone from trading for as little as 78 cents per share to more than $20 per share. Regardless of industry observers' opinion of SCO's grievances, the company's decision to battle IBM and the open-source community certainly has boosted it, at least in the short term.
However, as IDC vice president Dan Kusnetzky told the E-Commerce Times, the legal costs SCO is incurring make its litigation business model (as IBM termed it in a recently filed countersuit) a risky one. Resolution could be years away, and there is no guarantee of an outcome that favors SCO.
Kusnetzky added that a legal victory will not necessarily assure SCO's long-term survival either, unless it is acquired or can reposition itself as a licensing company for intellectual property. In addition to selling IP licenses for Unix, the company provides global Web services and its own proprietary flavor of Unix, called OpenServer -- but it seems far less focused on these products than on winning its $3 billion lawsuit, and this attitude is unlikely to win it many new customers.
What are SCO's long-term plans? Have the company's recent legal maneuverings positioned it for a windfall followed by long-term licensing success , or have they opened a Pandora's box of problems that ultimately will lead to its demise?
The Problem with Litigation
Aberdeen Group research director Bill Claybrook told the E-Commerce Times that if SCO fails to win its lawsuit, the company's stock will drop to $0 because it does not have any products that anyone wants to buy now, let alone four or five years down the road.
According to Claybrook, OpenServer's install base has been eroding, and SCO has not made any significant enhancements to the product that might stanch the customer outflow. Nor has SCO ever established a Linux presence, which could have mitigated at least some of the hostility that has united the open-source community against the company.
Moreover, Kusnetzky said that to strengthen OpenServer's and UnixWare's market positions, SCO, which does not sell hardware, must maintain good relationships with hardware vendors.
"But who would trust [SCO] after the IBM suit?" he said. "And they have threatened end-user customers with litigation. In effect, they have destroyed themselves as either a Unix or Linux supplier."
Beyond Linux
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell told the E-Commerce Times that he is well aware of the objections IBM, Red Hat, the open-source community and its allies have to SCO's decision to aggressively pursue the companies it has charged with copyright infringement.
However, Stowell noted that SCO's long-term business strategy does not revolve around the lawsuits. In a recent E-Commerce Times article, he said that SCO's attorneys are working on a contingency basis, which means they will be paid only if SCO wins.
Instead, Stowell said, SCO's long-term plans revolve around future developments to its Unix platform and the expansion of SCOx, the company's .NET equivalent targeted at the small and medium business market, with emphasis on certain verticals.
SCO's TAK(Group)
SCO already has announced a partnership with Portland, Oregon-based TAKGroup, a privately held company that provides e-services and management applications for the downstream petroleum supply chain. TAKGroup's customers, including major petroleum vendors CITGO, ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil, use the company's technology to move their oil and petroleum from ground pumps all the way to individual service stations.
TAKGroup CEO Randy Edgerton told the E-Commerce Times that his company chose to partner with SCO because SCO has a couple of attributes that are critical to success in his industry: great technology and a large global reseller network that can provide services at a local level -- which, in TAKGroup's case, is often the local gas station.
TAKGroup's use of SCOx technology, Stowell said, allows TAKGroup to extend its services beyond its U.S. sites. Also, by taking advantage of SCO's reseller network, TAKGroup can accomplish tasks more efficiently than it can using its own resources alone.
As Edgerton put it, "From our vantage point, [SCO] offers real opportunity for small and medium businesses, and more so those customers who are served by these businesses."
The question now is how many customers will agree when the dust settles.
I hope the SCO does lose their lawsuits and go out of business. There are too many vampire ...
Related Stories
SGI Removes Code, Rebuffs SCO October 06, 2003
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell told TechNewsWorld that his company is "kind of mixed" on SGI's action and letter. "While it's good of [SGI] to make an effort to try and remove code which may have been misappropriated into Linux, they also minimize the code having gone into Linux," he said.
SCO Mulls Terminating SGI License October 02, 2003
Although SGI has said it believes its release of code as open source to Linux has been consistent with its Unix contract with SCO, the company warned in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing this week that it could lose the license. SGI told LinuxInsider that SCO is not talking to the company about litigation, calling the matter "a Unix license issue."
IBM Withholds Indemnity as It Expands SCO Countersuit September 29, 2003
"IBM's approach seems to be to stand up in front of the train and offer to take the direct hit," IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky told the E-Commerce Times. "Maybe they figure they don't need to prove to their partners and customers that they're willing to take on the fight, because they already have."
HP To Protect Linux Customers from SCO Suit September 24, 2003
SCO's actions, starting with its suit against Big Blue in March, have prompted numerous reactions, ranging from a countersuit filed by leading Linux distributor Red Hat to hacker attacks that brought down SCO's Web site for several days last month.
SCO Yanks Second IBM License August 14, 2003
Similar to its claim that IBM used its Unix V source code in AIX, SCO now is claiming improper transfer of Sequent Unix source code and development methods in Linux.
Related News Alerts
More by Staff Writer
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round Two: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 13, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round two of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match, in which Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle square off on one of today's key Mac issues. Today Enderle and Chaffin eachs kicks metaphorical mounds of sand on the arguments the other made in round one on the question of where Apple will be five years from now.
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round One: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 12, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round one of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match. Today, Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle each offer their predictions of what sort of company Apple will be in five years. Will Apple rule the "Digital Life" -- or be the Atari of 2009?
PeopleSoft Blames Oracle for Share Price Free Fall July 07, 2004
Forrester vice president and CRM analyst Erin Kinikin described PeopleSoft as being on a very narrow tightrope since Oracle first made its takeover offer. "To prove [it] can survive as an independent company, PeopleSoft has to make its numbers," Kinikin told CRM Buyer. "Any time PeopleSoft pre-announces lower earnings, people are going to wonder if [it is] falling off the tightrope."