By Staff Writer E-Commerce Times
08/19/03 2:08 PM PT
Like its predecessors, SoBig.F is unique because it has a short life cycle. Its expiration date is September 10, 2003.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
As predicted last week in TechNewsWorld's "Profile of a SuperWorm," the latest variant in the SoBig worm family has been unleashed, with Internet security firms reporting that several copies have been found in the wild.
Like the previous five versions of the worm, SoBig.F can be spread via either e-mail or network shares. It takes control of an infected PC and creates e-mail messages spoofing the PC's address, which then are sent to accounts listed in the PC's address book.
The worm also grants back-door access to the infected computer, enabling an attacker to hijack the machine to steal confidential data, implement spam relay servers or perhaps even distribute updates to the worm itself. Virus writers often use such methods to forward their code to as many inboxes as possible, making it a "successful" virus.
Latest Spamming Techniques
Strong evidence exists that SoBig's creator has used spamming techniques to create the variants of this worm, Sophos senior security analyst Chris Belthoff told the E-Commerce Times.
For his part, Vincent Weafer, senior director of Symantec's (Nasdaq: SYMC) Security Response team, agreed that spamming techniques have provided SoBig.F with the ability to propagate e-mail messages around the world. This interconnectivity between worms like SoBig.F and spammers creates a double-barreled impact for end users, who already are coping with spam's exponential growth, he told the E-Commerce Times.
However, Belthoff said that unlike most spammers, who are trying to make money, SoBig.F's creator and the creators of other viruses have different motivations.
"They are trying to slow down networks, clog system pipelines and put IT departments in hell," he said.
Social Engineering a Factor
With subject lines like "Re: That Movie" or "Re: Wicked Screensaver," SoBig.F entices recipients of spoofed e-mails to click on attached, zipped .pif files. The fact that users must click on these files to activate the worm theoretically should be a deterrent to its spread. Unfortunately, SoBig.F is spreading, indicating that users are not as security-aware as they need to be, Belthoff said.
"There's an element of psychology involved to entice you to keep clicking. I may know not to click on the 'wicked screensaver,' but my kids might, especially when it seems to come from someone" they know, he noted.
He added that on the corporate side, IT departments need to improve security education for all users, including many who telecommute and inadvertently cause worms to spread.
"IT departments like to say end users are part of the problem, but they're also part of the solution," Belthoff said.
SoBig a Containment
Weafer recommended that home and small business users download the latest security patch from Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) Web site, update their antivirus programs and obtain a personal firewall. In addition, users should do a security audit of their PCs to check for vulnerabilities.
On the enterprise side, Weafer said, IT administrators should determine the source of infection and contain it before attempting to eradicate it. Then they should consider erecting firewalls between branches and organizations to help isolate future outbreaks, and should watch for security patches and vulnerabilities germane to their systems.
However, Aberdeen Group vice president Jim Hurley told the E-Commerce Times that the expense and time required to patch systems is directly related to an organization's size and the size of its IT infrastructure. Therefore, IT administrators typically avoid patches unless they see a good reason to apply them.
Not So Super
Like its predecessors, SoBig.F is unique because it has a short life cycle -- generally two to three weeks. Weafer said there may be several reasons why SoBig.F's author has implemented an expiration date. For example, he or she may be testing different variants to see which one works best, may be concerned that an earlier variant could interfere with a newer one, or may want to avoid getting caught.
SoBig.F's expiration date is September 10, 2003. When asked if he thinks the worm's author may be preparing a "super" SoBig for September 11th, Belthoff said that while an extremely destructive version could be in the works, all SoBig variants are completely preventable. The key is keeping virus protection up to date and not clicking on attached files, even if they appear to have come from a trusted source, unless such files are expected.
Why is it that Microsoft ships Outlook Express opening attachments of certain file types ...
Next Article in Security
RIAA Details Subpoena Strategy August 19, 2003
U.S. Senator Norm Coleman (R-Minnesota), who chairs the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, revealed the recording industry association promised to provide supplementary documents that confirm it is not targeting "nominal users."
Related Stories
Think Like a Hacker: The Best Scanning Tools August 16, 2003
They may be the best way to make sure your network is safe, but today's scanning appliances are far more complex than the simple tools of yesteryear.
Profile of the Superworm: SoBig.E Exposed August 13, 2003
The latest variant of the SoBig lineage has mulitple infection vectors and hidden exploit channels. For example, spam normally represents 30 to 60 percent of daily e-mail volume on the Internet. The new capabilities embedded in the SoBig.E worm will increase that volume by a factor of 10.
Windows Threat Realized - Blaster Worm Spreads August 12, 2003
Although the Blaster worm was designed to propagate without wreaking havoc on systems or data, there is a chance that a variant or copycat might deliver a more damaging payload.
Published Code Exposes Windows Flaw July 28, 2003
Security experts said the discovery and distribution of code to exploit the Windows flaw is consistent with the pattern of vulnerability followed by exploit followed by attack.
Related News Alerts
More by Staff Writer
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round Two: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 13, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round two of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match, in which Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle square off on one of today's key Mac issues. Today Enderle and Chaffin eachs kicks metaphorical mounds of sand on the arguments the other made in round one on the question of where Apple will be five years from now.
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round One: Enderle vs. Chaffin July 12, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round one of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match. Today, Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle each offer their predictions of what sort of company Apple will be in five years. Will Apple rule the "Digital Life" -- or be the Atari of 2009?
PeopleSoft Blames Oracle for Share Price Free Fall July 07, 2004
Forrester vice president and CRM analyst Erin Kinikin described PeopleSoft as being on a very narrow tightrope since Oracle first made its takeover offer. "To prove [it] can survive as an independent company, PeopleSoft has to make its numbers," Kinikin told CRM Buyer. "Any time PeopleSoft pre-announces lower earnings, people are going to wonder if [it is] falling off the tightrope."