By Keith Regan E-Commerce Times
08/05/03 7:30 AM PT
Red Hat's complaint contains seven individual allegations, two aimed at proving that its products do not infringe on SCO's patents and the other five seeking injunctions and remedial action for claims that Red Hat Linux borrows from Unix.
Success is just a matter of knowing the right "secrets." Download the free eBook, "The Edge of Success: 9 Building Blocks to Double Your Sales." You will discover the fastest, most effective ways to grow your business and still have time to live your life.
Leading Linux vendor Red Hat has filed suit against The SCO Group, aiming to prove that Red Hat software does not infringe on SCO patents and to stop SCO from making what it called "untrue" statements.
The Raleigh, North Carolina-based firm also announced plans to establish a US$1 million legal defense fund to help smaller firms battle SCO in court. Specifically, the "Open Source Now Fund" will cover the legal expenses of companies that choose to contest SCO's claims that enterprises running Linux also must buy UnixWare licenses to avoid legal action.
Red Hat said it will not extend its legal assistance offer to customers, even though open source users are themselves considered liable for copyright infringement.
The moves put SCO on the receiving end of significant legal action for the first time since it filed a $1 billion breach of contract suit against IBM (NYSE: IBM) in March. The amount sought in that suit has since been upped to $3 billion.
Red Hat general counsel Mark Webbink said the primary goal of his company's new lawsuit is to "stop SCO from making unsubstantiated and untrue public statements attacking Red Hat Linux and the integrity of the Open Source software development process."
Preemptive Action
"The collaborative process of Open Source software development which created the Linux operating system has been unjustly questioned and threatened," said Red Hat CEO Matthew Szulik. "Red Hat has a responsibility to ensure the legal rights of users are protected."
Analysts generally viewed the moves as preemptive strikes. Although SCO started at the top by suing IBM for $1 billion, it eventually could have taken aim at Red Hat and other firms that commercially market Linux.
Other industry observers said the move might force SCO to detail more quickly which portions of the Linux operating system actually contain proprietary Unix code. Such disclosure would enable a worldwide army of Linux developers to set about rewriting the Linux code.
Confusion Abounds
Regardless of its potential benefits, though, the Red Hat suit could further muddy the already murky waters surrounding Linux.
Gartner (NYSE: IT) analyst George Weiss told the E-Commerce Times that enterprises are still sifting through the meaning of SCO's demands that Unix licenses be purchased to avoid copyright claims.
"Even though Red Hat wasn't in the crosshairs, it is going to be impacted," Weiss said. Because corporations often choose Linux because of total-cost-of-ownership benefits, the added cost of purchasing a UnixWare license could make Red Hat a less viable alternative. "The IBM case could take a year or more to work out, and Red Hat is trying to make things clearer sooner."
Seven Up
Red Hat's complaint contains seven individual allegations, two aimed at proving that its products do not infringe on SCO's patents and the other five seeking injunctions and remedial action for claims that Red Hat Linux borrows from Unix.
Also on Monday, the results of a survey of Linux developers found the majority are not worried about SCO's claims. Evans Data Corp. said that of 400 developers surveyed, 70 percent said the suit will "probably not" or "absolutely not" affect plans to expand use of Linux in their enterprises.
SCO's Biggest Stalwart – Microsoft? August 01, 2003
Microsoft has already purchased a license from SCO to free the company of future claims against Linux. The deal is estimated at about US$10 million. SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell would not discuss the terms of the deal, but confirmed that Microsoft is an ally.
Split Decision on SCO Impact, Response July 29, 2003
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell argued that the proposed license –- a runtime-only binary license –- is separate from Linux and the GPL that covers it. He told TechNewsWorld that SCO believes use of Linux could lead to end-user liability.
IBM Pushes Linux in Face of SCO Suit July 25, 2003
Calling SCO's attempts to sell licenses to Linux users "nonsense," Aberdeen Group's Bill Claybrook questioned why companies should buy such a license before even knowing whether it is really required.
SCO Takes Linux Licensing Fight Further July 22, 2003
By stating that Linux creator Linus Torvalds inherited the copyright violation and was not responsible for it, SCO is "trying to ruffle as few feathers as possible."
Will SCO's Suit Chill the Penguin? June 11, 2003
Despite the intricacy of the SCO vs. IBM tangle, it has been suggested that the foundation of SCO's case could unravel if a judge were to take the General Public License (GPL) into account.
Related News Alerts
More by Keith Regan
Yahoo Slaps Fresh Coat of Gloss on Microsoft Deal Defense June 30, 2008
With its shareholders meeting set to take place in less than five weeks, Yahoo has put together a 32-page presentation, emphasizing why the investors should vote to keep the current board in place. The company also reiterated why it chose to partner with Google instead of letting Microsoft buy part of it.
French Court Stings eBay With $63M Judgment Over Knockoff Sales June 30, 2008
eBay is planning to appeal a ruling by a French court that ordered it to pay $63 million to the luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessey. The court also barred the online auctioneer from selling four brands of perfume on its Web sites accessible in France.
New Auto Loan Leads Marketplace Shifts Into Drive June 30, 2008
Reply.com's move into the auto finance market is a logical one the company, as automotive advertising spending is moving online in increasingly greater amounts. The company is partnering with the Detroit Trading Company to create a massive repository of auto finance leads online.