NEWS

OPINION
Who Needs Colorful Little Tech Firms Anyway?

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints

Every company that tried to be the next Microsoft or the next Amazon, only to turn out to be the next Webvan, proved that flashy, high-profile startups are not usually destined to grow into behemoths.


If you're ready to take your Java skills to the next level, we're ready for you! The Online Business Unit at Sears Holdings Corporation is hiring for Developers, Architects, Business Analysts, Project Managers, and Delivery Managers. Apply online.

In the technology aquarium, they were the brightly colored, fancy fish that darted around and drew attention to themselves. The bigger fish swam by slowly, patiently waiting for the tank to be all theirs once again.

Well, it just about is. The majority of the little fish did themselves in, swimming too fast or eating too much. Or they drew a bit too much attention to themselves and ended up as meals for the bigger fish. Whatever the reason, the aquarium is a lot less colorful and a lot more peaceful than it was just a couple of years ago.

That's too bad, right? Small companies, after all, provide innovation and energy, enabling the sparks of creativity to fly. They can turn on a dime and give the market what it needs. They can think outside the box and tackle problems other companies didn’t even know existed. Right?

Maybe. Then again, maybe all those bright little fish did was create a distraction, drawing our attention away from what really mattered most: the ability to survive the long periods when little or no food fell into the tank.

Peace and Quiet

It's funny, but after more than two years of down markets and shakeouts, it's hard to remember what some of the fancy little fish looked like, or even what their names were. They went from darters to floaters so quickly we never really got a chance to know most of them, or even to figure out whether the tricks they performed were really useful.

They reminded us that it's human nature to be drawn to the new and exciting at the expense of the familiar and steady.

Sure, the big companies enjoyed the fact that more people were paying attention to the aquarium in general. Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) Latest News about Microsoft, eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) Latest News about eBay and Dell (Nasdaq: DELL) Latest News about Dell didn't try too hard to distance themselves from the fancy fish as long as fancy fish were in vogue.

But they couldn't be more different. And every company that tried to be the next Microsoft or the next Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) Latest News about Amazon.com, only to turn out to be the next Webvan, proved that point. They weren't even cheap imitations of the original. They weren't chips off the old block either.

They were an example of bad chemistry, the result of ambition and free cash mixed together in dangerous amounts. They seemed important, but who can remember them now?

Add Money and Shake

It's impossible to read the dot-com and tech dead lists -- assuming the publication that maintained your favorite list isn't dead itself -- without blushing a bit; that is, when you're not busy scratching your head in an effort to remember.

One list starts with Art.com -- now resurrected under new management -- and ends with Xigo, a consulting firm by the looks of it, which someone cared enough about to cache its home page for posterity. In between were DeepCanyon.com -- domain name currently available -- and TimeDance.com.

All of this less happened in less than two years, remember, and less than three years ago. It's not quite like the dinosaurs outliving the meteor; after all, the Apples and HPs of the tech world are barely middle-aged.

Which Came First?

Maybe there is a bit of the chicken-and-egg syndrome going on here. Are companies that matter important because they've been around for a long time, or have they been around for a long time because they matter? Do companies that matter start off as bright little fish themselves?

The answer is no. This isn't to say there's no value in startups, that venture-backed firms haven't provided a lot to the technology economy. But not all tech startups are darting rainbow fish. Some are just happy to swim around, minding their own business, hiding behind the underwater castle to avoid being eaten. They do not do backflips or other tricks to draw attention to themselves.

And they are essential to the ecology of the aquarium. They balance things out, keeping the cycle of life from coming to an over-the-handlebars halt. They are tomorrow's big, meandering fish. They, too, will learn soon enough which bright little fish to eat and which ones to simply ignore.

If only it were so easy for the rest of us. No question about it -- the technology world is far, far better off without all the little fish messing things up. But someone save me a seat in the front row, just in case they ever come back.


Note: The opinions expressed by our columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the E-Commerce Times or its management.

Social Networking Toolbox:
Talkback: Join the Discussion.
Re: Who Needs Colorful Little Tech Firms Anyway?
michael_ortner
Posted 2003-04-23
I agree with the main point of the article, but I disagree with the writer when he groups ...
Re: Who Needs Colorful Little Tech Firms Anyway?
kathleen.mccahill
Posted 2003-04-23
The oldest of these Big Fish is Microsoft 1975 ...

Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Keith Regan   RSS

Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]