I shudder to think of a world without
Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO)
. But the
company's recent spate of new revenue tactics
reeks of desperation.
As I pen my last column for this publication, I find myself entertaining the previously unthinkable notion that the grandfather of the Internet is mortal and could pass away.
Hell-bent on patching huge bottom-line gaps created by
the advertising
downturn, Yahoo's newly installed boss,
Terry Semel -- chief rescue officer, if you will -- is
trying to squeeze users for cash at every turn.
Yahoo's ambush-style sales bids may sate its investors in the short term, but they could alienate so many users that the company may not live to see a life-saving advertising upswing.
Phone Bills
As a frequent Yahoo! Mail user, I can recall numerous instances in which inexplicable lapses in mailbox access have tested my patience.
Perhaps a knowledgeable customer service
representative might have calmed my nerves. But would
I pay US$1.99 per minute for information that probably
would not even restore my mailbox access? Not a chance.
The problem, Yahoo! recently announced, is that it is testing fee-based customer service for its e-mail customers. And this is just one of many backdoor money-generating schemes unveiled by the company.
Spare Some Change?
Granted, Yahoo! has lost money for five consecutive quarters -- forfeiting a total of $92.8 million in 2001, thanks to a dismal advertising climate.
In this respect, I do not blame Semel for hunting down new revenue wellsprings.
But does he have to be so abrupt and underhanded about it?
Boorish Blitz
Take, for instance, Yahoo's new "opt-out" marketing strategy.
Gunning for a 50 to 70 percent boost in use of its premium
services
-- which currently bring in an average of 27
cents per user -- Yahoo! is pushing the privacy
envelope with new guerrilla marketing efforts.
The company's 219 million users are now subject to
promotional phone calls, e-mail and direct mail
unless they take time to opt out of the sales
hit list.
By giving customers the choice to opt out, Yahoo! has managed to dodge reprimands from privacy policy makers like TrustE.
I suspect that it will not be so lucky with disgruntled customers.
Sales Matters
During Semel's tenure, Yahoo! has tacked on fees for such services as classified ad posting, forwarding e-mail to an outside account, online games, e-mail storage space, and some features of its GeoCities Web page builder.
In December, when the company introduced fees for its online payment service, PayDirect, I knew it would not be Yahoo's last free-to-fee transition.
PayDirect charges -- 2.5 percent of the transaction amount plus 30 cents -- drew fire from many loyal users, which will intensify with each new fee levied.
A December online forum posting read: "Bye-bye, Yahoo! I refuse to pay a dime for any of these free services that they've now decided to charge for! That is a greedy bait-and-switch."
Missed Opportunity?
If Yahoo! executives could have predicted this moment
two years ago, when they were holding merger talks with
eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY)
,
perhaps they would have worked harder to
channel non-advertising-based revenue.
But you know what they say about hindsight.
The company's feverish attempts to make up for lost time and money may be one more indication that the all-for-free and free-for-all days of the Internet are indeed coming to an end.
Will Yahoo! go the way of Boo.com, Webvan and
Pets.com? Probably not. But it may endure some grave
setbacks before it strikes the best balance between
altruistic community building and profitability
mandates.
![]()
Note: The opinions expressed by our columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the E-Commerce Times or its management.