By Erika Morphy E-Commerce Times
10/07/08 1:44 PM PT
Use of Google's Chrome browser has declined since its launch a month ago, but that hardly seems surprising, given that a certain number of those who downloaded it were undoubtedly checking it out with no real intention of making a long-term commitment. With just a month of usage statistics available, it's too soon to draw any conclusions about Chrome's real market potential.
Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) new Web browser,
Chrome, is key to the company's push to connect its myriad Web offerings and become an integrated online service provider. That said, writing it off a month after its release -- based partly on figures that show a decline in downloads -- seems more Schadenfreude than sober analysis.
Chrome's share of the overall market
peaked on Sept. 4 at 1.16 percent, according to
NetApplications. By Oct. 5, that number had dropped to 0.81 percent. Taking into account day-to-day fluctuations, the usage appears to have stabilized at .7 percent after the initial surge of downloads from both Google fans who were ready to switch and the merely curious.
Snapshots of Usage
Other metrics hint at Chrome's place in the browser universe: Three weeks after its debut, nearly 2 percent of traffic to
Telegraph.co.uk, the
Web site of the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph, came via Google Chrome, according to WebTrends, an analytics firm that has incorporated Google Chrome into its on-demand reports.
Chrome's appeal is based mainly on its performance; the browser able to speedily process a request no matter how many tabs are open.
"I love its speed, its URL space as search space, its ability to render pages quickly, and it keeping my top nine most visited pages right up front and more," David Murrow, director of
Allison & Partners, told LinuxInsider.
It's not perfect, though, he added. "I also notice that different Web forms -- event listings submission forms and such -- are not yet Chrome-compatible and tend to freeze up or do not work sometimes."
Chrome's Drawbacks
Chrome faces criticism on a number of scores. Even leaving aside the performance glitches -- something that can be expected in any new app -- Chrome's
approach to privacy and content ownership strikes many as downright creepy.
OmniBox -- Chrome's address and search bar combo -- is said to track user keystrokes. The browser's end-user licensing agreement, or EULA, gives Google "a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and nonexclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post, or display on or through the Services."
None of this -- from the speedy performance to the Big Brother tracking -- has escaped Chrome's early adopters, said Kristin Coffin, client service officer for
Grail Research, which has conducted its own survey on Chrome use during its first month of existence.
"Most users have had a good initial experience with Chrome," Coffin told LinuxInsider. "There are some things that could be improved, and many are uncomfortable with the privacy issues."
Other missing features that users would like to see in a Chrome 2.0 release, according to Grail, include more security protection, a faster autofill feature, a fix for the memory leak problems identified in the first version and the lack of a bundled product. Right now, Chrome is a standalone browser.
Also notable in the Grail report is that the number of negatives about Chrome far exceed the limited number of negatives listed about competing browsers.
Still, it is too early for most people who experimented with Chrome to decide whether they will permanently shift away from their current browser -- a state of affairs reflected in the slight drop in usage from 1.16 percent to .7 percent, Coffin said.
Schadenfreude is defined as "enjoyment obtained from the troubles of ...
Next Article in Software
Will Chrome Find a Home With SaaS? October 07, 2008
The launch of a new open source browser, Chrome, seemed like an audacious move even for Google. Although Firefox has managed to break IE's stranglehold, the browser market isn't exactly wide open. Still, Chrome has some features that make it a particularly interesting choice for on-demand applications -- and it might even sway some corporate decision makers who are still on the fence about SaaS.
Related Stories
Google's Chrome Could Use a Good Spit-Shine September 11, 2008
Google now has its own Web browser, and why not? It's got one of everything else, right? Chrome got off to a bad start with reviewer Walaika Haskins, as its EULA appeared to insist that Google had rights to anything and everything posted using the browser. That gripe aside, Chrome did alright performance-wise, but it lacks some of the finer points that competitors have mastered.
Related News Alerts
More by Erika Morphy
Palm Beats Itself to a Pulp March 19, 2010
Palm's inability to excite consumers over the Pre is a colossal marketing failure, suggested Patrick Gilbert, CEO of 4Smartphone. "This is not a tech or design issue -- the problem is they haven't been able to reach out to users or the developer community," he said.
Survey Totes Up Value of Excellent Online Customer Service March 19, 2010
There's gold in the e-commerce hills for companies willing to take their customer service to a higher level. Consumers are willing to pay almost 11 percent more to get excellent customer service along with their purchases, according to an Ovum survey, yet few e-tailers meet that standard. Heading a list put together by StellaService, which commissioned the study, are Zappos.com, Diapers.com and BlueNile.com.
Twitter Flies the Coop March 16, 2010
Twitter has found a way to flit around to other Web locales through a feature called "@anywhere." Amazon, eBay, The Huffington Post, YouTube and others will be able to open a Twitter window to users, allowing them to send and receive messages without leaving the site. Social media marketers are salivating at the possibilities.