By Jeffrey Hill and Tom Karol TechNewsWorld Part of the ECT News Network
07/17/08 5:00 AM PT
End-users of AMD and Intel virtualization solutions have reported substantial improvements in system and application availability, according to Aberdeen research. The end-users also indicated reductions in the number of severs required to complete the same or more work and a resulting increase in infrastructure efficiency.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
Virtualization has evolved from a development tool running on the desktop to an essential component of IT infrastructure strategy . Companies use virtualization as a means to increase desktop, server and storage utilization, to consolidate data center operations and utility costs, and to reduce the data center's floor space.
Virtualization can address many ills. Optimally, successful virtualization results in a more productive and more flexible data center, which can easily scale to meet new demands. It also results in reduced costs, both in power and data center footprint and increasing data availability -- an aggressive set of goals.
End-users of both AMD and Intel virtualization solutions were asked to report their experience in addressing the following virtualization targets:
System availability
Data availability
System complexity
Impact on space and power requirements
A General Improvement
End-users of both AMD and Intel reported marked improvements in systems availability. As displayed in Figure 1, Intel users' improvements were about 1.5 times greater for both server and desktop availability. Improvement in storage availability was about equal.
Figure 1: Year-Over-Year Change in System Availability (click on image to enlarge)
A similar case exists in data/applications availability. General improvements were reported by both sets of users. Intel users reported improvements in data/application availability about 1.8 times greater than that of AMD users. However, as depicted in Figure 2, they also indicated substantially less success in meeting data service level agreements (SLAs). AMD end-users reported meeting these agreements at a rate 12 percent higher than Intel end-users.
Figure 2: Year-Over-Year Change in Data/Applications Availability (click on image to enlarge)
System Complexity - Less Is Actually More
Figure 3: Virtualization's Impact on System Complexity (click on image to enlarge)
Virtualization has had a significant impact on the size and composition of end-user configurations. Intel end-users turned (by replacement or retirement) almost 25 percent of their server farm and reduced the total number by over 13 percent. AMD end-users turned about 30 percent of their servers, reducing the total number by almost 11 percent.
These numbers depict a virtual tie in this most critical performance metric. However, when asked about change in infrastructure efficiency, a question akin to, "Are you better off today then you were last year?" AMD end-users reported an infrastructure efficiency increase 1.2 times that of Intel.
Less Space + Less Power = More Green
By optimizing existing systems, virtualization can reduce the total number of servers, desktops and storage hardware required to do the same amount of work. The 11 percent to 14 percent efficiency improvements reported above translate into real savings in the footprint size of the system infrastructure requiring support.
In tandem with a reduction in footprint is often a reduction in power requirements. Using less power and less hardware to support similar or greater workloads is a scenario that all "green" advocates would applaud. Figure 4 presents how well end-users of AMD and Intel achieved this status.
Figure 4: Impact on Space and Power - Year-Over-Year Change (click on image to enlarge)
AMD end-users reported greater success in both reducing footprint and power consumption. AMD end-users reported footprint reduction in the two areas most specific to x86 virtualization, server rack space and data center floor space, substantially greater than Intel users.
From the "green" perspective, AMD end-users reported a reduction in power consumption while Intel end-users reported a slight gain. In every measure of space utilization and power usage, the performance reported by AMD end-users is slightly and in some cases substantially, better.
Solution Snapshot
Solution providers in virtualizing the x86 platforms are primarily AMD and Intel. Other technologies are utilized to enhance and enable server, desktop and storage virtualization. A partial list of vendors follows:
Cisco
Citrix (Xensource)
HP
Microsoft
Red Hat
Key Takeaways
Virtualization can be enabled and enhanced with several technologies. x86 virtualization is effective in addressing multiple issues that plague current system configurations:
All end-users of AMD and Intel reported substantial improvement in system and application availability.
The growing problem of system complexity was also addressed with reported reductions in the number of severs required to complete the same or more work and the resulting increase in infrastructure efficiency.
The reductions in footprint and reductions or containment in power consumption establishes the "green" credentials of this technology and provides users with the opportunity to actually do more with less.
Virtualizing the x86 server farm has major positive ramifications. End-users of both AMD and Intel reported significant progress on several important metrics, so either solution is a better option than non-implementation.
Jeffrey Hill is a senior research analyst in the data management and storage practice group at the Aberdeen Group. He can be reached at jeffrey.hill@aberdeen.com.
Tom Karol is a research associate in the Aberdeen Group's technology markets area. He can be reached at tom.karol@aberdeen.com.
A No-Brainer for SMBs July 11, 2008
There are many advantages to outsourcing application delivery services, notes Kevin Mahon, founder and president of Kemp Technologies. For one, it decreases management requirements. Also, customers don't have to deal with multiple vendors with individual contracts.
Related Stories
Microsoft's Hyper-V Finally Shows Up to Virtualization Party June 27, 2008
The final version of Microsoft's Hyper-V has been made available for download. The software is Redmond's attempt to secure a place in the burgeoning market for server virtualization, technology that allows users to run multiple virtual machines on the same physical server, saving energy and space.
Marathon CTO Jerry Melnick: A Fault-Tolerant Approach to Virtualization June 22, 2008
Marathon Technologies CTO Jerry Melnick has helped bring attention to his company's efforts to strengthen virtualized systems. With its new everRun VM product, Marathon aims to enable "automation of all functions that completely protects the virtualization environment," he said. "With everRun VM, there is not a lot to do. Transparency is the key."
Related News Alerts
More by Jeffrey Hill and Tom Karol
Simplifying Data Storage With iSCSI April 03, 2008
iSCSI, or small computer systems interface protocol over the Internet, has been a slow starter in the marketplace. However, a combination of two major factors -- faster networks and strategic use of network routers -- have made iSCI more attractive.