By Keith Regan E-Commerce Times
05/07/07 10:44 AM PT
NBC Universal and Viacom have filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of a copyright infringement case against YouTube. Additionally, England's top soccer league, the Football Association Premier League, is suing YouTube, claiming that the video-sharing site enabled copyright violation of soccer match images by users.
Increase Customer Sales with VerticalResponse Email Marketing! Quickly and easily send email newsletters, coupons & sales announcements to your customers – no technical expertise needed. Sign up for your Free Trial today and send 100 emails on us!
Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) YouTube-related legal struggles have mounted in recent days, with NBC Universal and Viacom (NYSE: VIAb) lending support to a California journalist's copyright infringement suit against the video-sharing site, and a third lawsuit filed by England's top soccer league.
Both NBC Universal and Viacom -- which already has a US$1 billion copyright suit of its own pending against Google -- filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of a case brought last year by Bob Tur, who sued YouTube for allowing users to share video he shot of the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
Tur operates the Los Angeles News Service and owns the rights to a widely seen video clip showing truck driver Reginald Denny being dragged from his vehicle and beaten during the race-fueled riots that rocked the city's South Central neighborhood.
He filed suit last year in the U.S. District Court of the Central District, claiming copyright infringement. NBC Universal and Viacom filed briefs on Tur's behalf on Friday.
Separately, one of England's largest professional soccer leagues, the Football Association Premier League, sued YouTube, claiming in a suit filed in New York that Google's video-sharing site was enabling copyright infringement of soccer match images by users.
Teaming Up
NBC Universal has not directly taken action against YouTube. However, in its filing, NBCU -- which is 80 percent owned by General Electric (NYSE: GE) and 20 percent by France-based Vivendi -- said that "many" of its "most valuable copyrighted works have been copied, performed and disseminated without authorization by YouTube and other similarly operated Web sites.
"NBCU has a strong interest in preserving the strength and viability of all of its legal rights and remedies in response to such conduct," the brief adds.
The brief takes aim at Google's main argument to date, that it is acting as an Internet service provider, a position that could give it protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) against copyright claims.
"YouTube actively manipulates and modifies the content in ways that the uploading user clearly does not, including copying, reformatting and adapting the works," the companies argue." In operating its own commercial Web site, YouTube engages in activities that are reserved to the copyright holder."
The new suit, meanwhile, was brought by two U.S. law firms on behalf of the soccer league and Bourne, a music publishing house. The suit seeks an injunction against YouTube and unspecified damages.
Digital Defense
All three suits against YouTube similarly argue the site encourages massive copyright infringement on its Web site in order to generate revenue through ad sales for Google.
The search giant anticipated that legal woes would come as part of the YouTube package when it paid $1.65 billion for the site last year. It set aside a portion of that price tag to fight legal battles even as it has tried to strike partnerships and licensing deals.
Google's response to all the suits has been similar -- that it removes infringing videos when it receives requests from copyright holders to do so, as required by the DMCA, but that by its nature, YouTube cannot be consider a cause of infringement.
"Most content owners understand that we respect copyrights, we work every day to help them manage their content, and we are developing state-of-the-art tools to let them do that even better," said Kent Walker, Google's general counsel.
In the end, all of the suits against YouTube will boil down to the same DMCA-related arguments, with plaintiffs arguing that Google has done more than simply offer users a platform for sharing video.
"Google obviously felt confident that the safe harbor provisions of DMCA provided it legal backing before it bought YouTube," Michael Graham, an intellectual property attorney and partner with Marshall Gerstein & Borun, told the E-Commerce Times. The risks are significant, however, since a single case going against Google could create precedent that would likely prompt a deluge of similar actions.
For now, however, most suits may have more value in "gaining leverage for negotiations," Graham added.
$65M Missing Pants Vendetta May Provoke Consumer Rights Backlash May 05, 2007
Sooner or later, the spotlight will move away from Judge Roy Pearson Jr. and focus on how he was able to get this far with his complaint. Then, consumer advocates -- and, yes, litigators -- worry that a public backlash could develop against the protections in place for consumers.
Related Stories
Google: Viacom Suit Endangers Net Freedom May 01, 2007
Facing a $1 billion lawsuit from Viacom over copyrighted material distributed on YouTube, Google has claimed it is protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. By hosting content provided by others, the law's Safe Harbor provision protects it from liability so long as they act fast to remove copyrighted content once the owner notifies them, the search giant stated. Viacom refutes that defense.
YouTube Video Removal Fails to Placate Thai Government April 05, 2007
The Thai government is continuing its YouTube ban because a still frame of a video the government deems insulting remains on the site. Thai authorities said they had contacted YouTube to have the video and still image removed, though it appeared the clip itself had been removed by the person who posted it.
Related News Alerts
More by Keith Regan
Yahoo Slaps Fresh Coat of Gloss on Microsoft Deal Defense June 30, 2008
With its shareholders meeting set to take place in less than five weeks, Yahoo has put together a 32-page presentation, emphasizing why the investors should vote to keep the current board in place. The company also reiterated why it chose to partner with Google instead of letting Microsoft buy part of it.
French Court Stings eBay With $63M Judgment Over Knockoff Sales June 30, 2008
eBay is planning to appeal a ruling by a French court that ordered it to pay $63 million to the luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessey. The court also barred the online auctioneer from selling four brands of perfume on its Web sites accessible in France.
New Auto Loan Leads Marketplace Shifts Into Drive June 30, 2008
Reply.com's move into the auto finance market is a logical one the company, as automotive advertising spending is moving online in increasingly greater amounts. The company is partnering with the Detroit Trading Company to create a massive repository of auto finance leads online.