By Lori Enos E-Commerce Times
01/19/01 12:00 AM PT
According to the plaintiffs suing eBay, the decision on the fake sports memorabilia
case 'was a huge loss to all persons who expect honest
and fair dealings on the Internet.'
Better Email Security Just Got A Whole Lot Easier. And Cheaper. Introducing Security Software As A Service From Webroot. Free 14-Day Trial.
A California judge dismissed a US$100 million
class action lawsuit against eBay on Thursday, ruling that the
online auction house is not liable for the sale of phony sports
memorabilia on its Web site.
Plaintiffs' attorney Jim Krause said he would
argue at a hearing set for Tuesday before Judge Linda B. Quinn
for a change in the ruling.
However, Krause told the E-Commerce Times that "by
tradition" it is extremely difficult to convince a judge
to change a ruling once made.
At this level, "the case is lost," Krause said.
eBay chief executive officer
Meg Whitman reportedly told investors
during a conference call on Thursday that she was pleased with
the decision.
Playing Fair?
According to Krause, the ruling "was a huge loss
to all persons who expect
honest and fair dealings on the Internet."
The lawsuit, which was filed last spring, alleged
that eBay knew about the auctions of fake sports
memorabilia, but did little to stop them.
The suit also charged that eBay failed to provide,
or require sellers to provide, certificates of authenticity
(COA) as mandated by California state law.
The plaintiffs in the suit claimed that they purchased $10
million worth of phony memorabilia -- including trading cards,
baseball bats, and jerseys with forged signatures of pro
athletes -- through eBay. California state law would have
allowed the plaintiffs to collect up to 10 times actual damages
as a civil penalty.
For its part, eBay argued that it was not responsible for the
sales because sellers were responsible for entering their own
item description and choosing a category in which to list the
merchandise.
Description Medicine
Krause agreed with eBay's contention that it did not create the
item description, but said that under California state law, eBay
should have been held liable because it provided the
description to users via the Internet.
However, the court found that the allegation that eBay included the category
"Sports: Autographs" as a choice was "insufficient to impose an
obligation on defendant eBay to furnish a COA."
What's Next
After Tuesday's follow-up hearing, assuming
that the ruling stands, Krause plans to file an
appeal of the dismissal. Krause also said that he
intends to request that the related case against
eBay's co-defendants -- the sellers of the
allegedly fake merchandise and the experts who
allegedly authenticated the items -- be thrown out.
"eBay was the primary target," Krause said,
noting that the other defendants did not have
adequate financial resources to satisfy a
judgment, leaving little reason for his clients to
continue the suit against them.
The appeals process could take nine months to a year to
complete, but Krause has not lost hope.
"I think I'm right," he said. "I just have to convince other people."