NEWS

eBay Wins Sports Memorabilia Case

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints

According to the plaintiffs suing eBay, the decision on the fake sports memorabilia case 'was a huge loss to all persons who expect honest and fair dealings on the Internet.'


Better Email Security Just Got A Whole Lot Easier. And Cheaper. Introducing Security Software As A Service From Webroot. Free 14-Day Trial.

A California judge dismissed a US$100 million class action lawsuit against eBay on Thursday, ruling that the online auction house is not liable for the sale of phony sports memorabilia on its Web site.

Plaintiffs' attorney Jim Krause said he would argue at a hearing set for Tuesday before Judge Linda B. Quinn for a change in the ruling. However, Krause told the E-Commerce Times that "by tradition" it is extremely difficult to convince a judge to change a ruling once made.

At this level, "the case is lost," Krause said.

eBay chief executive officer Meg Whitman reportedly told investors during a conference call on Thursday that she was pleased with the decision.

Playing Fair?

According to Krause, the ruling "was a huge loss to all persons who expect honest and fair dealings on the Internet."

The lawsuit, which was filed last spring, alleged that eBay knew about the auctions of fake sports memorabilia, but did little to stop them. The suit also charged that eBay failed to provide, or require sellers to provide, certificates of authenticity (COA) as mandated by California state law.

The plaintiffs in the suit claimed that they purchased $10 million worth of phony memorabilia -- including trading cards, baseball bats, and jerseys with forged signatures of pro athletes -- through eBay. California state law would have allowed the plaintiffs to collect up to 10 times actual damages as a civil penalty.

For its part, eBay argued that it was not responsible for the sales because sellers were responsible for entering their own item description and choosing a category in which to list the merchandise.

Description Medicine

Krause agreed with eBay's contention that it did not create the item description, but said that under California state law, eBay should have been held liable because it provided the description to users via the Internet.

However, the court found that the allegation that eBay included the category "Sports: Autographs" as a choice was "insufficient to impose an obligation on defendant eBay to furnish a COA."

What's Next

After Tuesday's follow-up hearing, assuming that the ruling stands, Krause plans to file an appeal of the dismissal. Krause also said that he intends to request that the related case against eBay's co-defendants -- the sellers of the allegedly fake merchandise and the experts who allegedly authenticated the items -- be thrown out.

"eBay was the primary target," Krause said, noting that the other defendants did not have adequate financial resources to satisfy a judgment, leaving little reason for his clients to continue the suit against them.

The appeals process could take nine months to a year to complete, but Krause has not lost hope.

"I think I'm right," he said. "I just have to convince other people."

Social Networking Toolbox:
Talkback: Join the Discussion.
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
rocki hernande
Posted 2001-07-17
There are better bots, you know. Try http://www.price.com- you could have gotten the sopranos ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
Paul
Posted 2001-07-18
Did you mean www.pricegrabber.com? I went to price.com and couldn't find videos.
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
WayneSh21
Posted 2003-08-01
My company is currently developing a new shopping bot (shopping comparison site) completely ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
Peter Parrish
Posted 2001-07-16
No surprise to me. What the New Economy gurus never figured out is that consumer shopping is ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
Colin
Posted 2001-07-13
Interesting article. It left me wondering, though, what the E-tailers themselves think of the ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
Bob Jeffers
Posted 2001-07-16
As a former etailer I can tell you that Bots are the scourge of the etailing industry. Why would ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
Rich McMahon
Posted 2001-07-16
Bottom line: Bots offer a compelling value proposition to CONSUMERS. ...
Re: The Bottom Line on Online Shopping Bots
dotcommaven
Posted 2001-07-16
Even though e-tailers don't like the fact that the Net makes it easier to comparision shop, they ...
Thoughts/Beliefs on the Bots
Paul
Posted 2001-07-16
Some thoughts/beliefs: ...
Re: Thoughts/Beliefs on the Bots
Anna
Posted 2001-07-18
Dotcommaven said: "All of the bots provide the best 'buying' experience, but not a great ...
Re: Thoughts/Beliefs on the Bots
Paul
Posted 2001-07-18
What I meant about bringing the bot service to the point of purchase is this: I love shopping at ...
Re: Thoughts/Beliefs on the Bots
Moses
Posted 2001-07-17
You are right

Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Lori Enos   RSS

Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]