'The Internet gives everyone a degree of anonymity, to the point where any customer looks
and acts just like everyone else,' one analyst commented.
Better Email Security Just Got A Whole Lot Easier. And Cheaper. Introducing Security Software As A Service From Webroot. Free 14-Day Trial.
While the digital divide -- the rift between those with access to
computers and the Internet and without -- continues to
crumble in the United States, analysts generally agree that e-commerce
is not seeing a major share of the benefits.
On the other hand, researchers are finding evidence that
e-commerce services do play a significant role in alleviating
the disparities among races and genders that exist in
offline buying situations -- for example, when it
comes to buying a car.
A recent study by the Yale School of Management and the University of
California at Berkeley's Haas School of Business found that
the Internet serves as "an equalizer" for those whose
demographic characteristics -- primarily African-Americans, Hispanics
and women -- might end up costing them at a car dealership.
Researchers found that minority buyers pay about 2 percent more than white
customers -- about $500 on the average car -- at a dealership. Most of this
difference is due to factors such as differing income, education and search costs,
the study said. It did not reveal evidence of statistical race discrimination.
On the Internet, however, minorities pay the exact same prices as
non-minorities, regardless of income, education or other factors, according
to the study.
Negotiating Factors In
There was no indication that minorities or women dislike
bargaining or that they decide to shop at pricier dealerships.
The difference arises, said researchers, because car prices
are negotiated at a dealership, and socio-economic factors
often influence buyers' negotiating skills.
For example, the study found that people who
come from neighborhoods with a higher percentage of
college-educated residents pay lower prices at dealerships than
the average consumer. On average, women pay 0.2
percent more than men -- about $45 on the average car.
In contrast, said UC Berkeley marketing professor
Florian Zettelmeyer, online car-buying services demonstrate
the "knowledge is power" principle, putting all consumers
on the same footing.
"The Internet gives everyone a degree of anonymity,
to the point where any customer looks and acts just like
everyone else," Zettelmeyer told the E-Commerce Times.
The study, released December 11th, was conducted by Zettelmeyer and Yale
economics professor Fiona Scott Morton, using car purchase data
from J.D. Power and Associates
and Internet usage data from car-buying referral site
Autobytel.com
(Nasdaq:ABTL). In conducting the study, researchers
analyzed 700,000 new-car purchases made in 1999.
Leveling the Field
Zettelmeyer said the general findings can be applied to other
situations were consumers must negotiate prices with a salesperson
or choose from numerous pricing options, such as buying
life insurance.
"The research showed to us that not only are minorities
less likely to use the Internet, but that they would benefit more
than others by accessing it in these situations," he said. "I
think this makes a strong argument for doing what we can
to eliminate the digital divide."
Andrew Bartels, research leader for e-business at
Giga Information Group,
noted that online car buying brings other benefits for low-income
consumers -- for example, the chance to find
better prices outside their immediate neighborhoods.
Few Benefits for Industry
Experts agree that the digital divide in the U.S. has narrowed in
recent years, aided by government efforts and rapidly falling
PC prices. But since income is a bigger factor than Web access when
it comes to whether consumers will spend when
shopping online, analysts say the divide's erosion is having minimal
financial impact on e-commerce.
According to Bartels, the digital divide is being
approached primarily from the standpoint of increasing the
access that minorities and others have to information and basic services.
For example, lawmakers are moving to put free-access computer stations
and kiosks in schools, libraries and government buildings.
E-commerce companies have a different goal -- targeting people with
disposable income, who in most cases already have Internet access.
"The government can't cherry-pick," said Bartels. "They've
got to be able to offer these services to people of all incomes."
No Card, No Click
Even after getting access, lower-income consumers
face other barriers in using e-commerce sites.
Christopher Baum, a vice president and electronic government analyst
for Gartner,
believes that since credit cards remain the primary method
of payment on product sites, many buyers with credit problems
cannot take advantage of the Web.
Slow and Go
"Even if people do decide to go online, they tend to tiptoe toward
e-commerce, not buy things right away," said
Forrester
analyst Christopher Kelley.
Kelley said research indicates it is usually about a year before
those who go online begin to buy products on the Web. Privacy
and security remain the biggest concerns for those in
all demographic groups who remain skittish about buying online.
Numbers Count
According to year 2000 figures from the U.S. Department of Commerce,
there was at least one computer in 73.2 percent of homes with
incomes between $50,000 and $74,999. For
households making $75,000 or more, the figure was 86.3 percent.
By contrast, computers were in 30.1 percent of homes
with incomes between $15,000 and $25,000, and the figure
dropped to 19.2 percent for incomes under $15,000.
"The economic downturn is currently a greater factor
in e-commerce than the digital divide," Baum said.
Narrowing Straits
The Commerce Department reported that
55.7 percent of white households had a computer, 32.6
percent of African American households, 65.6 percent of
Asian-American homes, and 33.7 percent of Hispanic households owned a computer.
The 2000 figures showed 50.3 percent of whites
used the Internet (up from 37.6 percent), 29.3 percent of
African Americans (up from 19 percent), 49.4 percent of
Asian-Americans (up from 35.8 percent) and 23.7 percent
of Hispanics (up from 16.6 percent).