E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
See Full StoryAt Amazon.com, the link to the privacy policy is at the bottom of the home
page, in small print. At Buy.com, the policy measures 10 printed pages and
5,200 words in length. To read the full policy at Outpost.com, visitors
have to click out and back into the policy page at least twice.
Though the public's desire for privacy protection within e-commerce is
well-documented, the vast majority of online shoppers appear unwilling
to take the time to read an e-tailer's privacy policy. "Some people read privacy
policies, but it's a tiny minority," Susannah Fox, director of
research at the Pew
Internet and American Life Project in Washington, D.C., told the
E-Commerce Times. "People aren't that aggressive when it comes to
protecting their own privacy."
Posted by: Michael 2001-07-18 11:26:27 In reply to: ECT News
If there is only one site, (or perhaps a few) offering me the product I want and the privacy statement is excessively long or complicated, I return to the stone age method of a phone call or visit to my local retailer. If this is not an option, perhaps I need to review my need for the product!
The lazy or anxious consumer may forgive everything, if he can get what he seeks quickly and with minimal pain.
And this is the real issue. What level of pain is the consumer willing to tolerate for his 'needs'? Why should he have to monitor his privacy when the site owners should have the same feeling about his privacy that he does? He doesn't want to be a policy policeman. He has better things to do with his time than to keep track of online retailers who would take advantage of him. The next fancy widget is calling him. Or is it the cry of his hungry child?
Posted by: Madhurima 2001-06-18 06:43:30 In reply to: ECT News
Posted by: Fred Frinkle 2001-06-28 09:50:01 In reply to: Madhurima
Some of these third-party ad servers admit to collecting personally identifiable information on some of their other sites, but they then claim that they do not merge names with the info collected on all the sites they serve ads onto.
One can either believe them or wonder why, if no merging is ever involved, they crowd their data servers with personally identifiable information at all.
It must be said that even sites with the best intentions cannot guarantee their users protection from the third-party ad servers they work "with".
Posted by: Craig Tindall 2001-06-18 18:13:28 In reply to: Madhurima

Headline Feeds
