E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
See Full StoryPick up virtually any major media publication
covering the dot-com shakeout
of the past year and you're likely to come across
a slight variation on the
following theme: "the New Economy was a bust."
But was the New Economy really a complete hoax? Many economists actually
consider e-commerce to be only a small portion of what the media
collectively calls the New Economy. And despite the media's Chicken Little
cries that the sky is falling, these experts say that the New Economy is alive and
well.
Posted by: Johnson Louis 2001-05-17 10:24:14 In reply to: ECT News
People who didn't think downturns were possible were living in dreamland -- and it will happen again the next time there is a big economic boom. Collective amnesia.
Posted by: Anshul Verma 2001-05-17 08:28:26 In reply to: ECT News
Posted by: Joe LaGuardia 2001-05-17 06:47:10 In reply to: ECT News
The New Economy concept was based on the assumption that the widespread adoption of technology in companies and business processes would mean such an increase in productivity that it would create an scenario in which it would be possible to have unlimited growth without inflation. Thus, in theory, the business cycle was put to sleep.
It's impossible to argue against the fact that the role of technology in the economy is playing a significant role; but tecnology is just a medium, a tool, and a tool (and an extremely important one, at that) does not a new system make. So, it's the same Old Economy, but with different 'weapons', if you will.
Therefore, the concept of 'New Economy' has, in itself, proved absolutely wrong; it has failed. We are unfortunately seeing that the business cycle is far from dead.
Does this mean that the impact of technology in the Old Economy has failed? Absolutely not. It brings, in fact, all the elements of the new economy as described by Levy and Atkinson (dynamic global markets characterized by flexible, digitized production -- where risk, innovation, being first-to-market, and forging strategic alliances rule the day). Significant traits for which technology should be credited (although I'm not sure if I totally agree with some of them, especially after seeing what happened to some companies who were first-to-market).
But these factors alone do not define a New Economy: we're still fundamentally based in the same rules as always, and profit matters (at least, both Levy and Atkinson concede that...).
Posted by: Sheila Washin 2001-05-16 21:59:34 In reply to: ECT News

Headline Feeds
