E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
See Full StoryThe overriding message is certainly true:
Leading members of Congress are telling President George W.
Bush that truly global e-commerce is necessary
for a strong U.S. economy.
No arguments there. But the next step is one that
should be taken with great care: Bush is being urged
to jump into the fray and help pave the way for
worldwide e-commerce growth.
First of all, taxes work as a system for the redistribution of wealth and the development of public services, as you see... imagine 7 of every 10 e-companies (such as amazon or the like) are in New York, or California or let's say Texas. The counties and state governments gather a fairly big amount of "normal" taxes because of the sale, but in the normal process there is a distributor, a retailer (or wholesaler) that also pays a tax in the non e-commerce state (one of the other 48 states with non well developed initiatives), so the e-commerce transaction leaves this non e-commerce state with no tax at all and only a one-direction flow of cash, out of the state.
That is one of the main problems and where the government will have to intervene, no matter how much the industry will regulate itself.
In conclusion, I am not supporting nor criticising the issue, however, I think that e-commerce needs to be looked at a deeper angle in order to make a decision on it. At the moment, I think that the Bush adminstration should take their hands off since the republicans have a notorious reputation for their ulterior motives to get rich quick and screw up the economy all at the same time.
Posted by: dotcommaven 2001-05-17 17:12:56 In reply to: Ravee

Headline Feeds
