E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
See Full StoryAt first, the idea of digital books sounded so futuristic. Even so, we wrote it off as
another passing innovation. Nevertheless, the major publishing houses have worked at
plans to enhance their presence in the e-book marketplace.
Posted by: M. Hildebrand 2001-12-02 01:49:35 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: Tim Thomas 2001-11-28 18:34:19 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
First, e-books are a terrible invasion of privacy. Second, they will help lead the charge of the growing number of illiterates. Third, there is no standard for the readers and they are likely to lead to eye problems and finally, they do not smell as good as a new book.
And if you have done any research you will see that studies by the Fouker Institute (1997 and 1999 SRDS) and the Turbocurran Compendium have shown that increased computer use has had a chilling effect upon children's inclination to read real books, thus potentially leading to more literacy issues.
And the eyestrain is another serious concern.
Tonight after reading your post I looked for these studies online, and evidently they are not widely available. Did they take into account the elements I listed above?
E-Books, if properly introduced to children through their own school systems, can become a part of the American lifestyle. I'll bet 20 years ago if someone told you there would be P.C.'s in every classroom you would have similarly resisted the suggestion.
There are numerous counties where the poverty line has slipped. Remember the digital divide? It does exist and there are many, many children who have no access to ebooks.
20 years ago I had an Apple and was one of the many happy people playing Space Eggs.
Also, I am not suggesting that all children have more disposable income. But many do.
No one is disputing the existence of a digital divide.
You seem to be straying from the subject at hand, which is whether or not e-books are a viable product.
Posted by: Cynthia Ellis 2001-11-21 16:46:50 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: DelfiniaTone 2001-11-19 18:04:40 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
They just don't want to pay hardback prices for them.
The only things holding the market back are too-high prices and availability of content: not enough titles in electronic form.
If the publishers don't get their act together, the consumers will create their own free market .... mp3s ring a bell?
Posted by: Ellen Anthony 2001-11-19 10:57:59 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
What I like best is I can store a bunch of titles in my reader and decide when I sit down what I want to read. Recently, I had a choice between "The Story of My Life" by Helen Keller, "Pig in a Park" by Pauline D. Jones, "The Little Wizard Stories of Oz" by Frank Baum, "The Manhunter" by Ellen Anthony, "Privacy" by Gini Wilson, "Winterhold" by Stephen Almekinder, "The Blue Fairy Book", several nonfiction articles I'd downloaded but hadn't had a chance to read, and a couple of the Harry Potter books. Sadly to say, only the Harry Potter books came from one of the publishers you mentioned in your article. The others retailed for $4 to $7 and came from small publishers who know the potential of ebooks.
Posted by: S. Joan Popek 2001-11-18 11:52:08 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Yes, you can read an ebook in bed. Dedicated ebook readers are wonderful. I won't go into the virtues of such as other people have already stated the case. The only reason they are not more popular is because of the price. If ebook readers could be manufactured and sold at lower prices, they would sell more. Just like computers were out of the price range of most families as few as 10 years ago, so are ebook readers a bit out of the average family's budget allowance right now. But just as PCs became more affordable, so will the ereaders.
Think back to when audio books were first introduced. People said, "Who would want to LISTEN to a book?" Well, obviously, many people do. The sales of audio books are booming.
It will be the same with ebooks. I love the idea of being able to buy a book, download it to my ebook reader and carry 10 to 12 books around with me. As you said, it is a "Brave New World," Mr Greenberg. Open your eyes and do your homework.
S. Joan Popek
Posted by: Marilyn Nesbit 2001-11-18 09:41:39 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
As one of the first independent electronic publishers, I've seen this market grow from just a few sales to thousands and we're just at the threshold of what will become one of the most economical and used products of the twenty-first century. Most ebooks are not only well priced, they are also easy to store, easy to take along, easy to read, and they are good for our environment and with an ebook reader you can curl up in bed with a good novel as well as read it in the dark.
From school children being able to substitute heavy backpacks full of books for a reader holding all their school textbooks to members of the blind community who have already praised the arrival of ebooks for opening a whole new world of reading material for them using a screen reader to read ebooks to them as well as the thousands who have already bought our books, they have spoken as if they want and need ebooks.
Posted by: Rita Hestand 2001-11-17 13:39:33 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
over. They are dabbling at it themselves because they know it is the direction the future is
taking us.
Also, the next generation is growing up on the computer, and they will take ebooks to bed and
read them without an annoying light hanging over their heads, because readers have lights built in
them. An advantage. Kids love computers and where they are going. And today's kids will
be tomorrow's adults that read.
Books take up space, waste our beautiful trees and tear up. They get water stains, food
stains, and smell after a while. Ebooks don't do any of that. Anyone not able to see the
future must be behind times, like the writer of this article.
Ebooks are the Star Trekkies, the aliens, the robots of the future. Print publishers refuse
to give ebooks a fair go of it, because they are afraid of it. True, there will always be
print publishers, but ebooks are the future. As long as there are computers, ebooks will
survive. And someday outsell the print.
Consider this, only a few decades ago, they called the paperback "trash". Well, it survived,
so will ebooks. Wait and see!
Rita Hestand
Posted by: Liz Wicker 2001-11-17 12:04:16 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: Leta Childers 2001-11-17 11:51:49 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Do I have to curl up in bed with a reading device in order to read these provocative, exciting new books published by a number of excellent independent e-publishers such as DiskUs Publishing (www.diskuspublishing.com) or Awe-Struck eBooks or HardShell? Absolutely not, even though I own several devices on which to read them. I can print them out economically and usually at a price still far below what traditional publishers are charging. Or if I choose to read one from my Rocket or Softbook or Palm, I can do so without even bothering my husband with a light...though usually, he, too, is reading either from a printed version or on a device at the same time.
Please, if you must comment on an industry, take a look at the entire industry. Publishing no longer is strictly the domain of Manhattan.
Leta Nolan Childers, author of the 1999 and 2000 best selling ebook, "The Best Laid Plans."
Posted by: Bobby Triker 2001-11-21 11:14:16 In reply to: Leta Childers
e-Books will not ever smell as good as a library full of REAL books.
Posted by: Kathleen 2001-11-17 10:41:46 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: Robin Bayne 2001-11-17 10:17:22 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Suffice to say, if you think you understand the e-book industry sir, you are grossly misled. Readers are heading for ebooks, but they shop at indy pubs and ebook stores. Amazon, Barnes&Noble and the big pubs have been in bed so long they forgot how to market succesfully to the public. Hence they latched onto celebrity endorsement ideas like Oprah's Book Club to get people to buy their product.
I doubt you even tried reading electronically. So what. There are still folks who think nothing illuminates better than candle flame. And why bother with a microwave when oven-cooking is so good. To each his own. Just don't insult us by suggesting you know what all readers want. You don't.
Posted by: Laraine 2001-11-16 13:26:24 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: Diana Kirk 2001-11-16 13:17:46 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
One of the problems with ebook readers is that they are way too expensive. Once the price comes down to below $100, look out. We have an entire generation that reads from a screen coming up behind us.
For me personally, I only purchase books from the small independent epublishers because they have figured out that ebooks should be priced less than traditional hardbacks. We all get stung by bad books out there, but I'd rather waste $3.50 than $24.95.
Instead of denigrating something before it has had a chance to fly, why not look for the positive and celebrate our abilities to go forward.
Posted by: Maralee Lowder 2001-11-16 12:18:52 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
reading ebooks on it. The convenience of being able to enlarge the print, carry several
books in one small device, replenishing the contents with low cost, WONDERFUL books, to
be a very positive experience. I would hate to be deprived of this opportunity. The only
reason ebooks have not been the phenomenal success they should have been is that
the manufacturers of the reading devices have fallen far short of their capabilities. What
we need is more, cheaper ereaders - not fewer ebooks!
Posted by: Barbara Hodges 2001-11-16 09:39:55 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Barbara M. Hodges
Author in electronic and print formats.
Posted by: B.C.Henderson 2001-11-16 09:06:18 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
My reader has a dozen fresh titles at a time to read in a car, plane, or yes, curled up in bed. I love it!
Kids who play electronic games expect the same ease in reading books. Fortunately small houses such as Hard Shell Word Factory are on top of it, so for the stodgy characters who are stuck in the last century...watch our smoke!
Betty Craker Henderson, an ebook & print author
Posted by: Natalie 2001-11-16 08:56:27 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
There is not a practical, affordable e-book reader. We need something with a large enough screen to read comfortably, that is not too heavy, that costs far less than two or three hundred dollars.
We need publishing houses that will EDIT the books they publish. All it takes is one poorly edited book--and I'm talking everything from dropped quotation marks to bad grammar to jumping from Chapter Nine to Chapter Thirteen--to make serious readers eschew the entire industry. And if that book costs the same as a paperback, forget it. We need lower pricing for downloads.
We need more marketing in traditional places, like magazines, so the voracious readers who would be a large part of the market can find the books that are out there. Then we need marketing for the special interests, all the people who have disabilities or challenges for whom e-books are a Godsend.
This industry is still a baby. It'll get there, one tiny step at a time. Don't write it off yet.
Natalie
Posted by: Marilyn Lee 2001-11-16 07:54:42 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Will we ever want ebooks? Yes, yes, and yes.
Posted by: Steve Knight 2001-11-16 00:02:17 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
1) The big 400 publishers have merged into 40.
2) In the depression we went from hardcover to softcover to survive.
So therefore if we want any new authors we must allow ebooks to prosper. Microsoft or somebody will invent a reasonable reader which will allow low cost downloads and eventually save the publishing business.
Best wishes and cheers,
Steve Knight, M.A.
Posted by: Patricia White 2001-11-15 23:01:00 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
I've read over a hundred ebooks and am happy to say the smaller, independent publishers have priced their books to sell. If that seems an impossibility, check out a few like Hard Shell Word Factory, Atlantic Bridge, or Writers-Exchange.
Patricia White
ebook and print author
Posted by: Mary Wolf 2001-11-15 22:39:21 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
I say yes, yes, and yes! I could give you a list of positive reasons for each of your three questions, but here's just one for each:
1-Yes we NEED them - so we as a society don't condone the ridiculous practice of returns, which results in TONS of books every month filling our landfills and being dumped in our oceans, not to mention the cost of the ones we do buy has to cover that waste.
2-Yes we WANT them - or as an independent epublisher with over 300 titles we would not have sold thousands of copies a month for the past several years.
3-YES WE CAN CURL UP IN BED WITH ONE--more comfortably too, I might add. With my Rocket eBook or my Hiebook, I don't get a cramped hand from holding the book open, or have to hear my hubby complain about the light or the crackle of pages keeping him awake!
Mr. Greenburg, do your homework.
Posted by: Scott Schmidt 2001-11-15 12:23:43 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Posted by: Terje Hillesun 2001-11-15 08:19:05 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Of course we can. Awaiting the movie I am reading Lord of The Rings at the moment. In paper. I have visited all the major e-book retailer in quest of an e-book version. In vain. I would have loved to curl up at night with my PocketPC reading - I mean reading- LOTR.
Posted by: reactor18 2001-11-13 21:16:46 In reply to: Paul A. Greenberg
Publishers will make money when they get a clue as to the nature of e-books and price them appropriately so.

Headline Feeds
