E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
See Full StoryBigger. Flashier. More intrusive. The advertising industry is willing to try anything and
everything to get people to pay more attention to their Internet advertising.
But if you hit the right note, any size ad can be effective. In other words, it's not
about the size of the banner, it's about what's in it.
Posted by: Jim 2001-09-17 15:27:29 In reply to: Keith Regan
Would it not be better, smarter and more likely successful to advertise your hotel on a travel site than on a zoo webcam page?
The numbers don't mean a thing if the relevancy does not exist. As a company, ours will only accept and place advertising that is relevant to our site. Yes, we actually don't accept some advertisers! I strongly feel that if more companies would take this approach, we could raise the overall integrity of web advertising, not have to football prices and make our relevant customers easier to sell.
That's my .02
Posted by: Rodrigo E. 2001-08-31 11:54:38 In reply to: Keith Regan
The masses work differently than you. Do you think that everyone is wrong? Maybe they use big ads because they get better results. Maybe if Columbia House uses a bigger ad they get higher clicks.
Beside, this thing happens on every media, not just internet. TV and radio, press, print, etc. Everyone is trying to be bigger, to be over the noise.
I do agree that the big problem with internet ads today is the context and the content of the ad, but that is not all.
Posted by: venturi 2001-09-01 19:34:54 In reply to: Rodrigo E.
Back to text. When you talk to a surfer you get inside their head a little, once you're inside your pitch becomes more plausible because now the surfer has shown a little trust in your offer. Trust sells. Blinking banners and flashy lights don't.
My $0.02.

Headline Feeds
